With facts. Which is precisely why these ideologies targeted academia. They control the accepted facts, and they can discredit and defund those who dare question their newly defined orthodoxy.

I think you're being sarcastic and deceitful, but it's still a valid question.

While I'm sarcastic to strawman and emotive arguments, I'm rarely deceitful. I may question in favor positions I don't fully believe myself, but that's not deceitful. That's just philosophical examination. Kind of surprised that you would think I'm not operating from a place of honesty, really.

It's the way in which the racialists, both left and right, behave to get their point across, mostly by 'hiding their power-level' from normies instead of being honest about their actual positions.

Anti-whiteness has become so institutionally acceptable on the Left at this point that it's probably the thing I'm going to get fired for fighting against it IRL.

First of all, hide your power level. Getting fired serves no purpose, unless you're simply ready for a change of employment. You aren't going to change things on an individual level. Focus on the zeitgeist. Second, you acknowledge institutionally acceptable anti-whiteness. But it's further than that. It's anti-white indoctrination. You don't unwind indoctrination by constantly triggering cognitive dissonance. You ease people into ideas that are uncomfortable, but not painful. Anyone that can't say kike or nigger or chink without discomfort isn't really free in their thoughts. That's why you notice and point, and don't simply start dumping a fact overload that will be summarily rejected. The rejection has nothing to do with the content of the message, but by the conditioning of the subject.

So despite what you say, noticing or 13/50 is precisely what you believe to be grooming. I prefer the term deprogramming, but that's semantics. The goal is the same. Creating receptiveness to ideas that would normally trigger cognitive dissonance.

racist cops, racist cops, racist cops. White people hate you. White people want to kill you. Cops will shoot you. Cops don't shoot white people. Racist cops. That's the only reason they'd pull you over. Racist cops. That's why you're in trouble. They'd let a white person go. Racist cops

While you're correct that this triggers a lot of the discord we're seeing, there are easily obtained facts that show exactly why blacks are disproportionately killed in police encounters. Namely, they're responsible for 44% of attacks on cops, which is what, in turn, leads to death of offenders.

Early Life. Early Life. Early Life. Check his name. Check her name. Look again. Find it. Find it. Find it. Find the Jew. Find the Jew. Every time. Every time. Every time. Look again. Every time. Early Life. Every time. Check Nose. Check Name.

Here it gets a little tricky. We're not dealing with recorded criminality, but instead promotion of degeneracy and undue influence over way too many people. Because there's no clear database of:

1. Journalism overall
2. Distribution by ethnicity
3. Articles promoting degeneracy It gets tough to make a clear argument. You can show massive disproportions in ownership and leadership within mainstream news or financial or legal organizations, but laying that out doesn't deprogram anyone. They'll still flinch cognitively when they become suspicious of the Jew. At least initially. That's why you get people to question, rather than say stupid shit like "it's all the Jews fault" (which isn't true, btw).

Now, we can look at other areas of influence that do have recorded information on influence.

https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors

Top 10 individual contributions:

1. (J)Sheldon Adelson $172,718,200
2. Richard Uihlein $59,129,742
3. (J)Tom Steyer $55,369,694
4. Timothy Mellon $50,080,755
5. (J)Stephen Schwarzman $28,937,100
6. (J)Jeffery Yass $24,279,700
7. (J)Donald Sussman $23,345,600
8. (J)Michael Bloomberg $21,609,205
9. Karla Jurvetson $20,965,441
10. (J)Jim Simons $20,965,201

The influence is there and disproportionate for anyone willing to see it.

That's why you see so much Early Life. Your community is fighting against degeneracy in our culture, and it has a disproportionate source. I just wish we had a journalism database that couldn't be dismissed as easily as the FBI uniform crime stats.

It's not about conditioning people, DoM. It's about deconditioning people so they can stand on their own with free thought. If you can say nigger without feeling anything, and not feel a need to say nigger, you're in a good place.

Good post, DoM. Thanks for responding and laying it out. Could you clarify what you believe to be grooming to be? If I were to guess, it would be things like noticing and pointing out disproportions along racial and ethnic lines without being overt and hateful about it. Is that far off base?

I see two scenarios:

1. Biden wins
2. Senate stays 51R
3. 4 years of ineffectual gridlock with an increasingly bold left wing
4. ???
5. Profit.

Or:

1. Trump wins
2. Senate still stays red
3. Fired up left loses faith in gov't
4. CA secedes
5. ???
6. Profit

There are other scenarios, but I think ??? is the most likely outcome.

It started to really blossom around that time, but there have been massive leaps in the circular logic of degeneracy since then. The seeds were really planted towards the end of the 19th century and into the early 20th, though.

Man made climate change isn't fake. We overload the Earth's carbon cycle by 2-4%. Interestingly enough, the Earth's carbon cycle seems to flex when carbon levels raise, increasing its capacity to cycle. I'm sure there's a limit on this, and we could probably reach runaway levels unchecked, but the models vastly overestimate the danger we're in right now, because the planet is more dynamic than the models account for.

To me, the colloquialism is "I'm going to eat your child out of your womb and leave you for dead." I grew up watching the critters kill laboring cows, though. Still seems pretty apt.

They trusted a woke business partner. I think that part is perfectly legal. The "in kind benefit" part could be interesting, though.

So people are betting Biden isn't a candidate by election day?

You're generally pretty reasonable. That probably would have went better if I'd remembered that initially, and I can sympathize with your schizophrenic mod duties. No need to apologize, but I appreciate it.

On a side note, why don't you just make a rule against antisemitism here? I know you and AoV both despise it more than other forms of identitarianism. It would piss off a lot of the current community, since you wouldn't have the benefit of a doubt that having the reddit admins hovering over you has given you, but you guys both seem to want to grow the community without those viewpoints driving off lukewarm moderates.

Nope. Didn't say nigger, either. Or niggerfaggot. I didn't even call anyone a kike. And I damned sure didn't direct it at a user. Arbitrary enforcement of "rules" that didn't actually exist was part of the problem with reddit. You've really internalized that shit.

Intel was king when they came out with core-i architecture (nehalem) and eliminated the front side bus, plus massive OC potential. AMD had nothing to compete. Intel made some improvements on speed over the years, but they mostly focused on reduced power consumption. They got complacent, and AMD finally snuck up and stuck a dick in em.

Wait, we can't say nigger or faggot here anymore? What changed?

e: Wait, no, nothing changed. The rule is the same. I checked. You're just intentionally misinterpreting the rule because you don't like the comment. It wasn't a slur directed at a user, or really, anyone in particular. It was a verb. Doubly stupid, because you made the fucking rule. Sad, DoM! Sad!

We'll always have the memes.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5f90b1bde87c1.jpg

I would have went with degeneracy, but heresy works too.

https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/luther-jews.asp

It's not hypocritical. It's what any nation with an interest in self preservation would do. Europeans just got it backward, and started praising everyone else and criticizing ourselves. Make no mistake, we let that shit happen. Granted, that's largely by influence that was never earned, but altruism and empathy are highly exploitable. If we don't learn and adapt, that's on us.

Last I checked, Marvel was still producing raw sewage. Makes a "boycott" easy. You might even call it "thrift".

The history of China is vast, and based as fuck. Just focus on the last 70 years or so.

Also, Taiwan seats the rightful government of the rest of China.

Probably the Israel relations. If he was born in the Mandate of Palestine, Zionism is steeped into his bones. People like to give Trump shit for all the kikesucking, but it's good when there are separate spaces.

tits or GTFO is still sound policy.

He was also nearly 50 years too late.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld#Institut_f%C3%BCr_Sexualwissenschaft

Also created Trannies.

Yeah, but not yet. If Trump can win despite this shit, the boot that crushes them will be welcome. We may be coming to an era where many pests can be quashed to applause.

Well, Trump is the unusual circumstance in my mind. In the current climate, Carlos Danger's transgressions would have been swept under the rug.