Man made climate change isn't fake. We overload the Earth's carbon cycle by 2-4%. Interestingly enough, the Earth's carbon cycle seems to flex when carbon levels raise, increasing its capacity to cycle. I'm sure there's a limit on this, and we could probably reach runaway levels unchecked, but the models vastly overestimate the danger we're in right now, because the planet is more dynamic than the models account for.
The reason they use "climate change" as a buzzword now is because the climate is literally always changing. It might have some periods where it's fairly stagnant, but it will always change eventually.
If huge companies took rising sea levels seriously they'd remove all their investments in countries and islands with low sea levels.
Carbon Dioxide is not a strong greenhouse gas, the spectrum of absorption/re-radiation for it is not all that broad, and therefore the graph of its increase in the atmosphere relative to warming is logarithmic.... Most of the warming is already "baked in" and as more is added there is exponentially diminishing returns. Even if CO2 were 4-5x its current levels warming would not increase much more than it must given current trajectories.
Man made climate change isn't fake. We overload the Earth's carbon cycle by 2-4%. Interestingly enough, the Earth's carbon cycle seems to flex when carbon levels raise, increasing its capacity to cycle. I'm sure there's a limit on this, and we could probably reach runaway levels unchecked, but the models vastly overestimate the danger we're in right now, because the planet is more dynamic than the models account for.
The reason they use "climate change" as a buzzword now is because the climate is literally always changing. It might have some periods where it's fairly stagnant, but it will always change eventually.
If huge companies took rising sea levels seriously they'd remove all their investments in countries and islands with low sea levels.
Carbon Dioxide is not a strong greenhouse gas, the spectrum of absorption/re-radiation for it is not all that broad, and therefore the graph of its increase in the atmosphere relative to warming is logarithmic.... Most of the warming is already "baked in" and as more is added there is exponentially diminishing returns. Even if CO2 were 4-5x its current levels warming would not increase much more than it must given current trajectories.