There was one dude that was riding another guy (cowgirl style) and yelling "Balles Tief!" "Balles Tief!"…I ask the dude next to me…"What's he screamin?!"…He informs "Balles Tief" is German for "Balls Deep"…
- Speaking no German, that's hilariously obvious from context and rhyme.
- If he's riding on top, then he is the one controlling the depth in the first place. Who's he yelling directions at? Or is he just proud of himself?
tl;dr: It watches RSS feeds, passes the torrents on to your downloader of choice. Will handle upgrading to higher resolutions if a better upgrade come along along with renaming, etc.. You have it dump into the same directory that Plex/Jellyfin is watching and you've got your own personal streaming service. There's an equivalent for movies: https://radarr.video and also ones for music/books/porn.
https://www-images.christianitytoday.com/images/117499.jpg
There's a lot not right about it. The healing brush all over the background. The missing fingers. The guy on the right has a left sleeve that's a mirrored copy of the right sleeve. The mystery shadow under Floyd's left arm.
The most charitable version is that this is the original framing: https://storage.googleapis.com/faithpot/2020/06/George-Floyd-Christian-life.jpg and an absolute newbie tried to widen it by fabricating and wanted to get rid of the car in the bg and the partial guy on the right.
>Rogue One
>Disney
Sort of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_television_series#Underworld
Rogue One was supposed to be an episode of a series that was in production and then on hold prior to the Disney acquisition. Then it got re-pitched afterwards and ended up as a standalone movie. It kind of straddles both eras. I wouldn't give Disney credit for it. At least not full credit.
I don't know that 10-11 would either. Nothing Meta does is aimed at ensuring confidentiality. For 12, they're probably good little compliance drones with all the paperwork in order. After all, that's how you ensure regulatory capture.
Trudeau still sucks, but you do bring up an interesting question.
In a representative democracy, does the ideal representative do what's right for the people or what the people want them to? On paper, someone elected by a bunch of retards in San Francisco is doing their job perfectly if they push for the policies those retards want. BUT, the policies they request and the outcomes that they actually want are usually in complete opposition. "REEEEE, want open borders but also please do something about crime! No police though, police bad." At what point does ignoring your constituents to save them from themselves become the job? And how is that not a double-sided argument when some RINO cucks to leftist policies against the will of their constituents?
Edit: The obvious answer is describing why you're voting on legislation the way you are, but 3 people are going to read your press releases. Anyone else is getting it repackaged by the MSM.
That's all and good, but let's go back to the original claim that was being discussed.
This. Communication beyond 2 SD less intelligent is near impossible outside of basic interaction.
If you define "basic interaction" as anything short of discussing economic concepts. Sure, it's impossible. But, to me at least, "basic interaction" means something you can manage with someone who barely even speaks your language.
Not being able to communicate with some 2 SD less intelligent would mean that someone with 129 IQ could manage better than basic interaction with someone with 100 IQ, but someone with 131 IQ would not be able to. Obviously a flawed premise. The decisive factor in the complexity of communication is the minimum of the two IQs, not the delta.
That was by design. EDH was fun community homebrew rules. The moment it got made "official," the writing was on the wall. It was going to eventually be the same shit show as everything else WotC/Hasbro touches. Not to say that covid and inflation didn't play a part.
That's not worth the legal controversy if it came to light. I can tell you right now what they'd do if the wrong person won:
Approximate retail value of the Prize: $3,000.
No substitutions or exchanges (including for cash) of the Prize or any portion thereof will be permitted, except that Sponsor reserves the right to substitute a prize of equal or greater value for the Prize.
"There was a scheduling conflict. Here's $3k. Don't call us." A tiny amount for a campaign to eat.
NO PURCHASE, PAYMENT, OR FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THIS PROMOTION.
As funny as it would be to enter without donating a cent, win, and then show up to the photo op with a MAGA hat on, they'd never make good.
I still wonder about that. I've always thought that there's a good chance that some people just say their internal thoughts are "heard" because that's the closest physical phenomenon to describe it to someone else.
We lack consistent language for describing things that we can't be certain are being experienced by another person in the same way. Make a noise, we can describe what both people experience as "hearing." But when both have a thought, there's no common reference stimulus to tie to the sensation.
We know it's aggravating, but you described it as "impossible." Most the replies are reading that literally like there is a bidirectional language barrier rather than it just being so frustrating it's difficult not to walk away.
It's awful close...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ301QEoo9Y&t=35
These reviews have dropped our rating from what would have been 96% to 94%, below the 95% threshold for "overwhelmingly positive" when we hit 500 reviews.
They're literally just bitter that they have "very" and not "overwhelming" next to their review score.
Can't be too careful about health. You wouldn't want someone to catch a cold during your drug-fueled gay orgy.