truly the foundation of every nation: pornography, gambling, sexy movies, and videogaming...
we agree that this ability to demand ID will be misused soon, that much is obvious. but, with all due and sincere respect, get a fucking grip, this rhetoric is pathetic and just makes us all look like uppity, porn-addicted children.
one mistake you keep making is that you think it's about skin color, when in fact these differently colored people are hated by people like me not because they are a different crayon out of the packet, but because they act evilly with such consistency that they can be equated to it. if tomorrow Europe turned into Africa it would be a tragedy not because of the loss of materialistic White beauty (it would have been God's plan for us to all become ugly, i suppose...) but because of the plethora of sins such a transformation would entail. we may have planks in our eyes but many Africans carry lumberyards around with them.
it is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't. but it is up to me, and you as well, to protect our people's goodness and salvation. allowing the defilement of all Christ stands for just for a crumb of a chance to maybe inspire one Ungbwebwe from Nigeria to become Christian would do nothing except feed personal pride - damn all these actual current-day Christians, and these people who are right at the edge of accepting Christ, i must be anti-racist and sacrifice them all to dedicate Christianity to the non-Whites, who in large part make a point of not being Christian.
with all that in mind, protection of our race from the others is, again, not worshipping race, or idolizing Darwin. it's simply protecting its goodness, and its inherent Christianity. we stand no chance of spreading any of it if we bring in rot from outside to destroy it first. Christianity is not a suicidal death cult. Jesus Christ did not die so that we, too, could die, and pointlessly to boot.
on the topic of Darwin, i don't find the idea of evolution incompatible with Christianity at all. whether God poofed us into existence, or set up this elaborate material system to create us over many years, it is equally glorious and impressive. with the Bible's penchant for not speaking literally it's likely enough in my opinion that Eve eating the apple was in fact the first human evolving just the right neurons for sapience... knowledge of good and evil, i.e. the ability to ponder good and evil. one could speculate about this forever, though.
that's a severely long way to disprove the beginning point of your own post.
European Christianity is a White thing (possibly what the European part means...). non-White Christians, unfortunately, tragically, and regrettably prove themselves unable of the same Christian values. for example, Zimbabwe is supposedly 84% Christian - would you say the commonplace state-encouraged rape and murder of White farmers is in accordance with Christianity?
if the answer is "they are obviously false Christians" then i propose that non-Whites are immensely more likely to falsely claim to be Christian than Whites, who most often have Christian values ingrained into them even if they claim to be atheist or agnostic. you would then argue as you already have that it is Christian-developed culture that results in this, and I would then ask what culture the original Christians had to go off when primordially deciding what the next two thousand years of development would look like. then it could be claimed it was not them but our Lord Jesus Christ who decided that, but that can be easily disproven by the very many who did not follow Him, such as the pharisees who later became modern judaists, and violent political revolutionaries in our dear Europe...
eventually we have to arrive to the fact that there is something not sociopolitical about Whites that resulted in our current sociopolitics. everything has its cause, and the cause of our current everything is our DNA, just as african poverty has its cause solidified well before colonialism occurred and just as mexican cartels mimic their aztec past with their evil torturous methods despite having access to modern, civilized culture.
nonetheless, race cannot and should not be worshipped. the way forward deeply involves Christianity, we agree on this. but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility - casting your pearls before swine, if you will.
my dear friend, your best argument when faced with the fact that little schoolgirls are the ones that will be hurt most by this (as that is who immigrants choose to rape, if not just adult women) is LOOK, LOOK IT'S BACKFIRING!!
you have nothing on anyone and should give up, especially when, if looking only at gender, their team makeup is entirely representative of the general population (3 males to 4 women - the last one could have gone either way). then you ALSO have to consider the proven fact that women most often choose to work in social positions whereas men work in practical positions, which means that, if anything, this team statistically underrepresents women.
if you look at race instead, this team is at least 40% non-White in a country that was at the time of the organization's founding 98% White.
either way, it doesn't matter. they could all be Welsh men and i'd still want to hang all of them, unless then it'd be "epic based mgtow comeback" that they want to import africans to rape evil feminist schoolgirls.
it was my first reaction when i saw they were there and intact, yeah. lucky their logo is plastered all over some of the vids, too. i suggest everyone does this, and that maybe people smarter than me scrape the site/wayback versions. i'd like for the origin of the twitter video to be found, everything suggests that it's a result of another school event.
i have been working on an open source custom-engined game nearly half my waking hours for the last 3 months.
every feature you add adds 10 bugs to fix. every bug you fix introduces 2 more elsewhere.
sometimes you are wondering if that other guy messing with LuaJIT somehow made pairs() leaky because for some reason it's grabbing values you are sure are not IN the table, just adjacent to it, and then 4 hours later with your console absolutely spammed with info updating prints you realize you wrote squad.taskName = taskName in a random spot hidden in a bunch of code where squad isn't the actual squad, but for some damned reason you wrote it so that it's actually squad.Actors in that context...
make your unity asset first person shooters all you want dude, but real games are hell to make.
again nothing you say makes a lick of sense, except to the sort of morons that get convinced of an idea just by having it repeated happily often enough...
No my point is your connection to porn with harmful drugs. not the same.
yes the same. easy dopamine, harmful, addictive.
someone who is anti game. could make the same connection with video games.
nuance is a powerful thing. feeling good because you beat a hard dark souls boss is OK. feeling good because you finally got the specific anime girl you wanted after paying 500 bucks and grinding for 70 hours straight is not OK.
Yeah the problem with that is...
"you see, our society is broken, men are fucked as a result, and keep doing fucked up things. that's why porn is okay."
get a grip.
nothing you just said makes sense. can you try again?
"uhh but like... opium?? addictive games??"
yes, normal people also think toxic repetitive Dota 2 and gacha/casino games are bad and should be shunned or, push comes to shove, outlawed... very few think that games generally considered good (like, i don't know, Hades) are ebul because you feel cool playing em.
as for your first line... yes, it's easy to access... that's the bad part? hard to access dopamine tends to be the healthy kind, like working out, being content with your situation in life, achieving something difficult but fulfilling?
"what's wrong with rape gangbangs of jap children, huh? what if all these depressed, suicidal young men who can't shut up about it online and who all have to go to therapy simply CHOOSE to jack it to that instead of meeting girls?"
...
the jews would take with them the loudest, screechiest, most shameless voices at the top of most opinion-shaping organizations. we'd find it much easier to bring sanity back unto the world with them gone, and with that sanity, solutions to all of our jew-indirect issues.
if extremely easy access to dopamine wasn't a bad thing we'd all be shooting up heroin. having it that easy to acquire, in a psychological-addiction-forming way, is dangerous to the psyche and brain chemistry, and that's ignoring the likely negative/dulling effect it has on any reproductive urges that could otherwise lead youth to getting a girlfriend/wife.
anyone who genuinely tries to argue in favor of porn must wrestle with the current societal image of millions of lonely young guys jerking it to japanese children and rape gangbangs instead of going out and talking to girls. and that's a match that can't be won.
there are two choices:
-
you are genuine, and should logically be depressed enough to immediately commit suicide
-
you are not genuine, and are thus saying this only to demoralize us - these efforts are generally not unpaid
you can make the average libertarian today flip flop between loving and hating corporations based on who speaks against em
if a communist says amazon is evil for its monopoly and genuinely horrendous treatment of workers, then amazon is actually great and creates so many jobs and gets my wife's boyfriend's sex toys to my door the same day i order em...
if another libertarian says it then amazon is a corrupt commie shithole that abuses workers just like the soviets (or national socialists if the particular libertarian has never opened a book in his life, which is likely)
the way you put words in my mouth and the way you would seemingly commit familial murder-suicide just to see Bungbwa open a Bible he can't understand makes me think you're not being genuine.
if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbiter, but that i simply call for common practical sense to be used when deciding how best to spread, and protect, Christianity. people following your way of thinking has resulted in situations like the fire at the Nantes Cathedral. what did that spread except flames all over Christianity?