I've been thinking about race, politics, family and all the crap that's been going on.
And one of the things I've realized about the elites, is that they hate poor whites and middle class whites more than anyone else, and I think the reason for hating whites makes sense when you think about it.
White people everywhere, wherever they are, generally think about freedom and push for freedom everywhere. That is a problem for them. They are only going to replace and remove whites from power in their countries because they can't control them, the goal is to put trojan horses in power that are also white or look white, and only replace them completely afterwards (this is where we are right now, notice how the whites in power is always a Marxist, it is never just about their own country and people).
We are actually seeing how all these Marxist supporters of Palestine are being pushed aside by the authorities (we know the don't give a shit about "minorities" at all), they immediately lost political influence and out of nowhere the "right wing" media now has the narrative power because they decided it is necessary, but when we are no longer useful to protect them, they are going to go back to whatever they want and kick us again, all of us, right and left alike.
They used leftists all this time to destroy our countries and gradually put control laws over our lives, when people went after them in 2011 with the whole Wall Street situation, they used leftist ideology to divide us, now that they are being attacked again, they are using the right to move the rage towards Muslims. (Who deserve it no doubt, but let's talk about who is really in control here).
So all this time, we have been being used by the elites and because the internet exists, they can no longer hide (that's why they want to control all social media as they did with the mass media), I think the "change" of narrative we are seeing that benefits the "right" is nothing more than another operation to protect themselves.
And here is the craziest thing I think is happening ... we are allowed to talk about protecting white countries and white people, because they are actually thinking of using white people as their strike force if shit goes down in flames ... white supremacist armed forces funded by Marxist globalists are on the table, because if necessary, they will not only have stronger white men killed in battle, but they will also imprison the survivors who win said race war through a new type of Nuremberg trials (the strongest will be dead, and the rest will be politically assassinated).
They thought they could control the browns and blacks because they really think they are racially superior (the white elite who are under Zionist influence, and the Zionist Jews themselves), but seeing how no one is publicly defending them, they have panicked and are thinking of using whites to defend them. And furthermore, the other reason why they were bringing Africans and Asians, among other Muslims to America and the West, is because black Americans and Hispanics are coming into ideological contact with whites and they can't let that happen.
But as I said before... now that the machine is running and the bureaucracy is too big to handle it, they can't stop the whole operation (mass indoctrination has that problem, that the machine doesn't stop running even if you try to stop it, because the useful idiots will continue to operate against your orders, they now believe the lies and that's why they are Marxists), so they are planning ahead. ... and as I said, the white supremacist groups are going to be controlled by the CIA and the feds, and they are going to be used as pawns, shock troops, or exterminators if necessary.
Crazy fucking long post but, i'm i seeing too much into this whole situation?.
one mistake you keep making is that you think it's about skin color, when in fact these differently colored people are hated by people like me not because they are a different crayon out of the packet, but because they act evilly with such consistency that they can be equated to it. if tomorrow Europe turned into Africa it would be a tragedy not because of the loss of materialistic White beauty (it would have been God's plan for us to all become ugly, i suppose...) but because of the plethora of sins such a transformation would entail. we may have planks in our eyes but many Africans carry lumberyards around with them.
it is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't. but it is up to me, and you as well, to protect our people's goodness and salvation. allowing the defilement of all Christ stands for just for a crumb of a chance to maybe inspire one Ungbwebwe from Nigeria to become Christian would do nothing except feed personal pride - damn all these actual current-day Christians, and these people who are right at the edge of accepting Christ, i must be anti-racist and sacrifice them all to dedicate Christianity to the non-Whites, who in large part make a point of not being Christian.
with all that in mind, protection of our race from the others is, again, not worshipping race, or idolizing Darwin. it's simply protecting its goodness, and its inherent Christianity. we stand no chance of spreading any of it if we bring in rot from outside to destroy it first. Christianity is not a suicidal death cult. Jesus Christ did not die so that we, too, could die, and pointlessly to boot.
on the topic of Darwin, i don't find the idea of evolution incompatible with Christianity at all. whether God poofed us into existence, or set up this elaborate material system to create us over many years, it is equally glorious and impressive. with the Bible's penchant for not speaking literally it's likely enough in my opinion that Eve eating the apple was in fact the first human evolving just the right neurons for sapience... knowledge of good and evil, i.e. the ability to ponder good and evil. one could speculate about this forever, though.
No, I am not making such a mistake. You are attributing evil to all people who appear "African" based on the behavior of some such people. Because some African people are sinners and perform horrific acts, by default, you have decided that all (or most) African are "biologically incapable of reason". In other words, as long as your judgement of such people is not based on the individual, but the demographic group they belong to, of which they have no choice is it was simply the accident of their birth, then you in fact making the judgement based on "skin color" (or similar arbitrary measure).
You are not protecting your race from others by denying salvation to others who would be Christian if they receive His message by deciding that these for these people "reason is a biological impossibility". The early missionaries knew that their one of the main roles as Christians was to spread His message to all who would embrace it, and were happy to martyr themselves for this noble aim. The message of Christ is not yours to keep to yourself or your 'race', it is open for all people. You are certainly are not protecting 'goodness' by spreading a false gospel that only white people are capable of being true Christians, you are doing the work of Satan.
Yes it is. It could not be more obvious that your blasphemous comments. You espouse both a corrupt version of evolution and a corrupt version Christianity. For the latter, I've already elaborated why your ideas are a corruption of Christianity - you are following a false god if you make Darwinism part of your value system. Life and societies evolve, yes, but evolution is so complex it is beyond the capability of any human to predict its outcome. To a large extent, all we can do is observe the wonders of the product of evolution - this amazingly complex mechanism that God created to bring about His plan. It cannot be part of a value system. Only His word can be.
As for the former, your understanding of evolution is equally flawed, for you are insisting that based on some arbitrary measure of 'goodness' means that your 'race' is superior than another 'race'. Yet I could come up with many more arbitrary measures that show your 'race' is inferior to others - tell me, what is the birth rate of people of your 'race'? How does it compare to the birth rate of those you deem to be 'biologically incapable of reason'? Oh, I'm sure you can come up with some excuse as to why this is an unfair measure on my part, which is entirely the point - it's not up to me or you to decide what the 'correct' measure is - that is for God to decide. He will decide what 'race' lives or goes extinct. Not you. It doesn't mean there is nothing you can do if you care about your 'race', what it does mean is focusing on your own morality and salvation, not choosing to follow false gods such as Darwinism, which lead you astray.
the way you put words in my mouth and the way you would seemingly commit familial murder-suicide just to see Bungbwa open a Bible he can't understand makes me think you're not being genuine.
if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbiter, but that i simply call for common practical sense to be used when deciding how best to spread, and protect, Christianity. people following your way of thinking has resulted in situations like the fire at the Nantes Cathedral. what did that spread except flames all over Christianity?
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.
For example, your words:
So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.
So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.
The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by token of their ancestry is a Jewish idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few.
if i were a jew in my thinking i would want to exterminate all africans to grab all the diamonds in the territory and start carving out statues of Jesus Christ out of them to idolize and worship.
i am not a jew, but a man with survival instincts and a rational mind: if the effort to proselytize to africa will kill us all off, there will be no more Christianity. i do not say your ideas aren't noble, but that they are potentially suicidal.
if my brother drinks and so do i, i have no right to judge him on it. if i drink while a pack of africans rape, torture and murder several children, i have the right to judge. if the same africans want to come over to me and rape, torture, and murder children much closer to me, i have the right to do much more than judge, and equally i have the right to call you insane for telling me to hold off, in case they start feeling regret for their actions.
colonialism was, among other things, an effort to make africa Christian. in response they remain in large part superstitious tribals (no matter their superficial claims) and hate and massacre us whenever they get the chance.
you will note most of the demonic possessions and miracles happen in black churches...
there are many signs that reprioritizing our limited resources to our own people will lead to much more holiness in the world than trying to convert a near-hopeless people from far away first. acknowledging this is not ultimate judgement or pride. it is due diligence. if it was not, Jesus Christ would have told us plainly - "find the worst sinner you can, tell him of me and my Father, then allow him to murder you for sport".