Expelling dual citizens who attack police, but no mention of deportations for Muslims who go around stabbing white civilians because they're white. So they might be deported for rioting and looting, if a gendarme happens to get a boo boo in the process, but there's no additional consequences for murdering Frenchmen who aren't police.
And what about the thousands of French churches that have burned down over the past decade? Are they going to start deporting Muslim arsonists, too?
You'll get no argument from me. But is this an improvement? Absolutely. Thus far, only terrorism has been ground for revocation of citizenship. This is a great way to start expanding this list, starting with something that has universal support.
This is the way the left operates, after all. "We need these repressive measures to go after pedos". Oh, pedos? Great, go ahead. "Well, now that these repressive measures are there, let's use them against MAGA."
This was pushed by Macron's 'center-left' party along with the 'center-right' Les Republicans (center-right in Europe means extreme-left). The Front National was excluded from deliberations, but from the final vote count, it seems their votes were indispensable.
Predictably, there was a far-left uproar over this, but as with the letter of the generals, the vast majority of French are on the side of reason. This has never mattered in the past, but the European establishment is panicking due to the rise of Le Pen, AfD, Wilders and others. Front National and Zemmour's Reconquest Party have close to 40% in recent polls, which is a lot in a parliamentary system. AfD is now the second party in Germany, beating all parties in the incumbent government. And recent polls show Wilders as having more than twice as many seats than the second largest party.
I think it’s fine. A country should determine who can and cannot be a citizen or who can come into their country. I’m sick of far leftist who want mass immigration but you don’t see them taking people into their houses. Also in the states you have “progressive” Christian’s who push the “Jesus was a refugee” nonsense
Yep. Around this time of year they will have nativity scenes with Jesus,Mary, and Joseph in cages. Or they did when the whole kids in cages hysteria was going on in the media
Macron supports the law, or at least says that he does. The final version that was passed has some provisions where the government has doubts about its constitutionality, so they will be reviewed by the constitutional court.
Even if some provisions are overturned, the rest will stand.
I LOVE the first one about dual citizens. We need that here in the states, especially in government
This was the law in Canada untill the Liberals took power.
There isn't a non-White violent criminals the Liberals don't want to inflict on White people.
Why are you separating Canadian Liberals from White people.
Those are the same group. The vast and sweeping majority of Canadian Liberals are white.
The vast and sweeping majority of Canadians are white. That's why they're differentiating it.
Australia bans dual citizens from serving in parliament…
Otherwise Australia would literally be run by foreign nations.
Dual citizenship should not be a thing. You either want to become X or stay Y. You don't get to have both.
Expelling dual citizens who attack police, but no mention of deportations for Muslims who go around stabbing white civilians because they're white. So they might be deported for rioting and looting, if a gendarme happens to get a boo boo in the process, but there's no additional consequences for murdering Frenchmen who aren't police.
And what about the thousands of French churches that have burned down over the past decade? Are they going to start deporting Muslim arsonists, too?
And then there's the proposal on the bottom.
You'll get no argument from me. But is this an improvement? Absolutely. Thus far, only terrorism has been ground for revocation of citizenship. This is a great way to start expanding this list, starting with something that has universal support.
This is the way the left operates, after all. "We need these repressive measures to go after pedos". Oh, pedos? Great, go ahead. "Well, now that these repressive measures are there, let's use them against MAGA."
This was pushed by Macron's 'center-left' party along with the 'center-right' Les Republicans (center-right in Europe means extreme-left). The Front National was excluded from deliberations, but from the final vote count, it seems their votes were indispensable.
Predictably, there was a far-left uproar over this, but as with the letter of the generals, the vast majority of French are on the side of reason. This has never mattered in the past, but the European establishment is panicking due to the rise of Le Pen, AfD, Wilders and others. Front National and Zemmour's Reconquest Party have close to 40% in recent polls, which is a lot in a parliamentary system. AfD is now the second party in Germany, beating all parties in the incumbent government. And recent polls show Wilders as having more than twice as many seats than the second largest party.
I think it’s fine. A country should determine who can and cannot be a citizen or who can come into their country. I’m sick of far leftist who want mass immigration but you don’t see them taking people into their houses. Also in the states you have “progressive” Christian’s who push the “Jesus was a refugee” nonsense
Dude went from one Roman territory to another Roman territory when he was a baby.
It's the equivalent of moving from California to Nevada.
No matter how many times that is explained, they still say it
OK, let's say Jesus was a refugee.
He left.
Yep. Around this time of year they will have nativity scenes with Jesus,Mary, and Joseph in cages. Or they did when the whole kids in cages hysteria was going on in the media
damage is done, though
same in every former White country
50 years too late. You need mass deportations or you'll be made extinct.
Don't hold your breath. AFAIK president Macaroni has already announced he'll try to get it revoked ... I mean ... "checked for constitutionality".
Macron supports the law, or at least says that he does. The final version that was passed has some provisions where the government has doubts about its constitutionality, so they will be reviewed by the constitutional court.
Even if some provisions are overturned, the rest will stand.
as opposed to Mr. Strongman commenting on the internet, lol... what flavor are you? roach, pajeet, spic? israeli?
ahh, monkey flavor.
Fat?!