2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I bowed out of reading the exchange. Everyone here gets into it with TheImpossible1 at some point. I agree with both of you on most points. The problem with arguing against him is you'll often find you're in agreement in general but disagreement in degree.

I'd argue that once you hit 5 employees you're reached critical mass for a lawsuit. Remember, it's not about truth, it's about perception. If the suit makes it to a jury, your organization will become a stand-in for all the "shitty" bosses the female jury members ever had.

1
asdfman2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evidence is a tool of the patriarchy!

3
asdfman2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

I, too, have an ultrawide monitor. But I use this concept called "windows" where I put one window on the side and read that while having other windows on the other side.

Just imagine trying to read this abomination of a screenshot on mobile.

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is Mattis on the board of this one, too?

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

The tragedy of TheImpossible1 is that he is rarely completely wrong. For example, if your org is 100% men and a woman sues you saying you discriminated against her in hiring, you're guaranteed to lose your suit unless she's beyond unqualified.

However, he takes it to the extreme and imputes motives onto all women, as if they're a hivemind. KiA2-minded women exist, and if anything, they are more hated by these HR types.

10
asdfman2000 10 points ago +10 / -0

Jesus dude, calm down. I can tell you without a doubt people will be turned off by the horrible fucking screenshot job. No sane person reads ultrawidescreen text like that.

If you type some of the words into google you might get a chan archive link. You could try that and link it if you want to increase exposure.

Or you could just attack people who seem interested but don't want to read an autist-widescreen screenshot.

5
asdfman2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

Once the left embraced the fact they only care about bodily autonomy when it aligns with their politics, the right realized they were never arguing in good faith.

You either believe in bodily autonomy or you don't. If the left is against bodily autonomy, then fuck it, pass whatever laws violating that.

12
asdfman2000 12 points ago +12 / -0

Also, remind me who attacked Fort Sumter?

You should look up what happened to precipitate the attack of Fort Sumter. Occupying a previously unoccupied fort and sending a massive military convoy to reinforce it isn't exactly a peaceful overture.

He may have ended slavery (and he didn't even really want to do that),

Neo-Confederate BS.

Dude, the war was 150 years ago. You don't need to keep fighting it. We're allowed to state uncomfortable truths about our side. Or maybe you're unaware:

In August 1862, Lincoln stated: "If I could save the union without freeing any slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that." In fact, by that time, immense pressure was building to end slavery and Lincoln had privately concluded that he could save the Union only by issuing an emancipation proclamation, which he had already drafted.

5
asdfman2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's a difference between blaming jews for all problems, and for pointing out based on socjus rhretoric, Jews are super-whites in terms of sitting at the top of every "oppression" hierarchy that exists today.

Richest, Most billionaires, least represented in prison sentences and arrests, highest college admittance, vast overrepresentation in government offices, etc.

I'm not saying Jews are the problem, but the fact they're omitted from socjus's "oppressor / oppressed" model is highly suspicious.

6
asdfman2000 6 points ago +6 / -0

Saw a cop forum discussion about it. They all agreed with the dude, but also agreed he will likely face punishment for "conduct unbecoming of a police officer".

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why were you having to do their work for them?

4
asdfman2000 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're not wrong in most of this post, but your use of "nigger" really hurts your argument.

Women follow social trends, but they also follow men they view as powerful and strong. You don't have to abuse her, but make it known that her friend is wrong, she is wrong, and her refusal to adhere to any kind of moral consistency demonstrates a complete lack of morality of which you thoroughly disapprove.

My wife fucking hates when I disagree with her, but she also respects that I don't back down when I'm right.

21
asdfman2000 21 points ago +21 / -0

fedposting: fed = federal (officer), posting = posting on online forum.

There are confirmed cases of federal officials / officers pretending to be random anonymous users, attempting to shift the conversation a desired direction.

There was a criminal case where the prosecution submitted screenshots of 4chan posts showing "(You)" on certain posts by a specific user, indicating the user was a federal officer who was "undercover". Users then used this officer's unique identifier to find them advocating for race war and promoting violence and shit.

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I'm trying to wrap my head around. Why stop counting ballots unless your goal is to:

a) Cheat more ballots and slip them in

b) Make people think you're cheating

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where's Zoolander when you need him?

9
asdfman2000 9 points ago +9 / -0

poorly written garbage

One of the LOTR TV Show's writers: https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1603861634041.png

1
asdfman2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trust me, I let go of the GOP in the 90’s. Doesn’t mean I can’t hope they get their heads out of their asses.

8
asdfman2000 8 points ago +8 / -0

Political campaigns these days are more about rallying the base and demoralizing the opposition than convincing the undecided.

That's why you see these massive demoralization campaigns being waged against conservatives. It's also why the Dems are so fervent in convincing certain groups to vote.

If young people mostly voted GOP, the twitch campaigns to convince people to vote would disappear overnight.

1
asdfman2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump is trying. We're trying. You're seeing some awakenings in the sleepy GOP. At least the GOPe isn't lockstep-hostile to Trump anymore like they were in 2016.

1
asdfman2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is exactly it. Hispanics are considered "White" pretty much only when it comes to crime stats. Otherwise, they're their own category.

1
asdfman2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump got 32% of the vote in CA in 2016.

Considering the demographics of CA gun ownership (PDF warning) combined with the demographics of GOP voting and military membership, I'd say Conservatives are perfectly safe from any kind attempts at secession in CA.

2
asdfman2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Appreciate you compiling all this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›