The tragedy of TheImpossible1 is that he is rarely completely wrong. For example, if your org is 100% men and a woman sues you saying you discriminated against her in hiring, you're guaranteed to lose your suit unless she's beyond unqualified.
However, he takes it to the extreme and imputes motives onto all women, as if they're a hivemind. KiA2-minded women exist, and if anything, they are more hated by these HR types.
See further down the thread. I’m aware that optically that does t look good for your case but scale of organization matters 15 person company all men vs 300 person company chances are at some point a more qualified women has shown up for some interview at the 300 person company but once you get that large the ceo/president isn’t directly involved with all new hires
Yeah, I bowed out of reading the exchange. Everyone here gets into it with TheImpossible1 at some point. I agree with both of you on most points. The problem with arguing against him is you'll often find you're in agreement in general but disagreement in degree.
I'd argue that once you hit 5 employees you're reached critical mass for a lawsuit. Remember, it's not about truth, it's about perception. If the suit makes it to a jury, your organization will become a stand-in for all the "shitty" bosses the female jury members ever had.
The tragedy of TheImpossible1 is that he is rarely completely wrong. For example, if your org is 100% men and a woman sues you saying you discriminated against her in hiring, you're guaranteed to lose your suit unless she's beyond unqualified.
However, he takes it to the extreme and imputes motives onto all women, as if they're a hivemind. KiA2-minded women exist, and if anything, they are more hated by these HR types.
See further down the thread. I’m aware that optically that does t look good for your case but scale of organization matters 15 person company all men vs 300 person company chances are at some point a more qualified women has shown up for some interview at the 300 person company but once you get that large the ceo/president isn’t directly involved with all new hires
Yeah, I bowed out of reading the exchange. Everyone here gets into it with TheImpossible1 at some point. I agree with both of you on most points. The problem with arguing against him is you'll often find you're in agreement in general but disagreement in degree.
I'd argue that once you hit 5 employees you're reached critical mass for a lawsuit. Remember, it's not about truth, it's about perception. If the suit makes it to a jury, your organization will become a stand-in for all the "shitty" bosses the female jury members ever had.