'Political assassination' is not 'gun deaths' retard. They are so unconnected as to the extent that you can even have political assassination, by firearm, in a country with zero firearms.
You just support murdering your political opponents and the good news is you won, I think they accept your standard now too.
Not so fast, sweaty, I have the Left-perspective rebuttals to all these arguments:
I think it is worth it to have some automobile accidents every single year so we can drive cars
Fuck you, cars ruin the planet, I'm going to run you over in one and we'll see how much you like cars
I think it is worth it to have some drownings every year so we can have swimming pools
Fuck you, bourgeois pool owner, I'm going to drown you in your pool then what you said will look real funny on reddit
I think it is worth trannies hanging themselves with ropes each year so that the rest of us can use rope to tie objects to trailers, boats, etc
Fuck you that's trans genocide, just for that I'm going to troon out and try not to hang myself, then we'll see who's laughing.
Why can't you just be a better person?
Edit: thanks for the gold kind stranger
You should be assassinated with a gun if you believe in gun ownership
"Many weren't just criticising..."
Don't argue any more. The headline as written doesn't need to be contradicted anyway, just celebrate it. Criticising somebody who's just been assassinated, because he's just been assassinated, is apologism for assassination. Apologism for assassination and political violence from the left - and the left exclusively, all unchallenged - is how we got here. Everyone knows this.
Firing them is a half measure. The fact that they were employed in these positions of trust in the first place, and can carry on trooning kids or lobbying for gay porn in libraries as long as they didn't tweet about Charlie Kirk, is the real symptom of disease in your society. Firing only means something if it reflects a change in a wider set of US social values and I don't see evidence of that (online, at least).
In the few disavowals and firings that have happened so far, it very much stinks of 'hey when you shoot back, please don't do it at our building, we already sacked that troon (our new troon replacement kept all his rantings to a private discord so he's clean)'.
It's one thing to attempt to kill presidential candidates, since they're big targets, but Kirk was just a moderate conservative killed for being visible and conservative. With this standard set, I don't know how you can distinguish it from civil war. The response from some of the left is to cheer and say 'that's what you get', while the rest say 'let's turn down the temperature', the same thing they said for a week after the Trump kill attempt before trying to get him killed again. It's the political equivalent of when the least violent nog bystanders in Worldstar videos gasp and shout daaayum hell naw, as if they're so surprised by violence and can't possibly approve, and fake turn away then turn back while failing to stifle a laugh.
It's open season on conservatives, yet mainstream conservatives are going to say a lot of cucked shit like 'let's not give in to hate' and 'we shouldn't be afraid to express ourselves' but this is denial of reality. You should be afraid to express yourselves, because it can demonstrably get you killed. Any right leaning person speaking to a group had better be sure it contains nobody who dislikes them. But you should have the courage to speak out anyway. And since talking can already get you killed, you should consider what else you might be prepared to do to improve your situation that might get you killed, besides speaking.
It's worth mentioning that that Harrison H Smith tweet was made a month ago so it's not just some hysterical reflexive speculation. Idk really who he is but he's an infowars guy from what I understand.
EDIT: found him elaborating on his tweet here
EDIT2: he's also broadcasting on rumble infowars as of this edit
https://rumble.com/v6xkx0a-infowars-network-feed-live-247.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_m
https://rumble.com/c/Infowars?e9s=src_v1_cbl
seems like a fairly earnest guy, not OTT
The story should be the anticheat. I couldn't give less of a fuck about early adopter whales seething about later buyers getting a better deal. I consider this a form of mental illness. The fact they copy paste their reviews doesn't detract from the impression that they're terminally seething.
Sad on both sides. I can tell that arresting officer is likely a non-white 'Bri'ish' muslim from his voice and he's barely literate while reading from his sheet of paper, or else it took him all his mental faculties to memorise that opening line.
Glinner's pathetic. 'I wrote Father Ted!', 'I'm gonna sue you into the GROUND!'(x10), 'you work for trans activists who go into women's bathrooms!' No, Graham, they work for the two tier anti-white police state, whom you were happy to cheer on for the same level of authoritarianism when you suspected it was ebil sexists on the receiving end.
He's not standing up for women and certainly not for the UK, he's advertising to the US wine moms and terf-types who attend his occasional public appearances as his only plausible sniff of pussy any more. The reason he's so angry is he thinks he's the last true Progressive, sold out by the left.
Panning sometimes looks fucking ass at 24 FPS, and I can't stand it. I think I'll prefer higher FPS, once they manage to make it not also look ass.
I'm also not an expert though, so if someone can convince me why 24 FPS is superior, I'm all ears. If they can make 60 look as good as 24, but providing better camera movement, that's a win.
See my post above or below about attempting to apply framegen to a movie, with the caveat that it's an opinion I formed literally last night.
Panning is actually what tipped me over into trying to apply framegen to the movie, because I agree with you that the low fps is most noticeable there. However with the fps increased, during the same pan I felt like I was able to sense every tremor and inconsistency in the cameraman's hands, which was way more distracting. Anything less than a gimbal or a dolly track might make this inferior in high fps.
Obviously some of this could be a result of the imperfections of AI framegen, but I think it also boils down to the philosophy of cinematic fiction. It's supposed to influence you to believe in certain things while also influencing you to forget certain other things. A low fps jerky pan is an awkward reminder of the craft behind the output, but perhaps low fps also serves to mask other telltales.
Replying because I had a quandary like this just last night, otherwise I might not have much to add. I was watching the movie Kwaidan/Kaidan (1964) and it turned out to be one of the most visually striking movies I've ever seen. It's also very theatrical, with obviously painted skies and artificial sets. So early on I got the bright idea to watch it with frame generation to see if it made it even more theatrical, enhancing the visual experience. I used the utility Lossless Scaling (handy little thing, available on Steam) and its frame gen to predictively double the frame rate.
The frame gen worked decently but it was just too uncanny. I felt like I wasn't watching a sculpted, crafted work any more and I was just watching people in costume run around goofily in front of me. Small inconsistencies in manual camera panning speed also seemed to get much more noticeable. So I settled for an 'unenhanced' offering. The imperfections and sense of random humanity you get from a theatre performance are not necessarily what you want to experience from cinema.
I've known people who act like something being 30fps, 60fps or 144fps makes no difference. Several years ago I might claim to be baffled by their obliviousness, but by now I know that humans operate on some very different levels of consciousness. Many different things can serve as a filter, this is just one.
Cenk of all people calling this out
IDK about the Yemen thing but Young Turks have gone full on Nigga Heil Hitler in response to attempts to silence Ana Kasparian.
https://boards.4chan.org/gif/thread/29376234 Clips in this thread have sound.
To summarise it's basically TYT trying to draw as much attention as possible to the dancing Israelis on 9/11, in response to Kasparian catching flak from anti-anti-semitic watchdog accounts. This timeline is getting fun.
Curious what you think of The Animated Series with all of the above said, although it's perfectly fine to dislike it just for being a cartoon.
My favourite Batman in any media is the first 2 Arkham games, since to me (not necessarily a Batman aficionado) they are the perfect blend of Burton Batman, The Animated Series and the comics mythos, voiced by Kevin Conroy. However they are essentially darker than the Burton Batman and they are susceptible to the whole Batying/Jokeryang, over-emphasis on the Bat and Joker relationship that you mention.
This became egregious by the point of Arkham Knight (4th game) where Batman's now fighting the Joker in his head and the Jokerspawns created by left-behind Joker blood. I understand this is somewhat of a reference to newer comics which I haven't read ('The Batman Who Laughs'), but for some of the reasons you said, this is just 2edgy4me.
Careful, this meme may be literally illegal in the EU, at least according to X:
https://x.com/isfjcutebear/status/1960994829594132494 (see replies) [edit: now this retweet, which was not subject to the censorship below, has been deleted. maybe X forced this user to take it down]
Original: https://x.com/isfjcutebear/status/1960483270061384069
For those who can't see Twitter or those outside the EU who only receive the lie about 'graphic content': it says 'This Post from @isfjcutebear has been withheld in European Union based on local law(s)' instead of showing a nearly identical meme to OP.
40%, same as the increase in working age deaths reported by the life insurance CEO in 2021. Ed Dowd probably has a lot on this too. Even for cult-covidian worshippers of rigged stats, the idea that covid itself was slaughtering people under 60 in 2021 is an unsupportable joke by now.
Personally I like the life insurance guy vid, because it's from a guy who doesn't suspect the vaxx at all, says the increase will cost his own business $100m and that he will be looking to recoup that loss in the form of higher premiums in less vaxxed areas - despite the fact we now know the vaxxed to have been diagnosed with covid at higher rates. This is a lesson that money doesn't matter in this and some nebulous 'market' will provide no pressure for a reckoning.
Some of them are pretty old.
Shiloh is also supposedly facing a Disorderly Conduct charge in Minnesota now:
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1960395664405262673
Although responses suggest that it's a misdemeanour and she's already moved out of the state, which would make it purely anti-white performativeness.
Sure it has, just look at infamous ECW nigger New Jack and his long history of legitimately trying to injure the guy he's working with and straight up attempting murder in the ring twice.
I hadn't heard of him. Reading about him sort of proves what I'm getting at though. The first was a hardcore match where nobody knew to step in and should be a higher trust setting by definition. The second one had to be stopped by an actual cop who happened to be there, but only after he stabbed the guy in the head 9 times. This guy really does fit the mould though:
"the more they called me a nigger, the angrier I got and the more I beat the guy up." - after first incident
Someone said the N-word so it was okay.
Performing in a live stunt show is going to do nothing but condition you into thinking that all the apparent violence around you is planned and coordinated. It might be planned poorly or feature clumsily executed moves which become dangerous, but there is no reason whatsoever to think one wrestler is going to ground and pound another unmoving wrestler to death. It's literally never happened before in any pro wrestling bout ever. Should that happen to be suddenly what transpires in front of a ref, all his conditioning is going to predispose him to thinking that's not what he's actually seeing.
That's what makes this so cowardly. In any other context, Raja could not have had a free ticket to pick up this guy, slam him down and wail on him as with as little outside intervention as there was, probably not even in a crowded street of strangers, plus the white guy would have defended himself in that context and possibly known not to relax in the first place. It's not about the ref. The more people cry 'refs?!' the more loudly I will shout 'NIGGERS'.
I remember seeing this clip and the curtain changes nothing about it for me. Crowder also missed probably the main reason she devalued herself: red flags for promiscuity.
She wants an 'adventure buddy' and loves 'parties', implication being she's doing all these exciting things already and just wants someone new to tag along. But is every guy supposed to assume she was doing these things alone or with girlfriends until now? It's less about selfishness or expense and more just the fact that she doesn't advertise herself as a keeper, since nobody appears to have kept her so far.
His whole Kick stream has been reuploaded. he's seething constantly even after having shaken the guy's hand, carries on talking about how much he's going to beat him. For an hour he sits and copes, doesn't watch any of the matches in front of him, just seethes at the chat comments hurting his brown pride and stoking his ire. Premeditated.
Wrestling refs are not real refs in the same way the wrestlers are not real combatants. You can't expect much more intervention from a wrestling ref than you would a lady walking her dog. This, once again, is simply a problem of a feral animal allowed into a high trust setting.
I've also seen claims like 'Maxwell says there is no Epstein client list'.
So compile one for us then, niggers, from the evidence of his dealings. They know exactly what we want, but they think playing these games is clever, as if anyone really believes there would be a single piece of paper found in Epstein's pocket titled 'MY LIST OF PEDO BUDDIES'. If there is no list, fucking make one. They were happy enough to give us a summary instead of the real thing when it came to the Trannifesto, but suddenly this is an alien concept when they're trying to redefine awkward issues out of existence.
Watched a little retrospective the other day, including Billy Budd and The Collector. Good retro movies, moreso The Collector. Apparently he's got a long spoken part in one of the side quests in Oblivion too. I never watched the tranny movie.
Good actor, but something bothered me about his voice when he became elderly - much like Michael Gambon, lingering and droning on certain syllables inappropriately, like his theatrical training was misfiring due to a blocked nose. Anyway, RIP.
Celebrating an accidental death would be crass but more excusable. Celebrating a guy being killed for the crime of being your political opponent, by someone on your political side, is an open declaration of hostile intent. It's acceptance of the moral standard of simply killing anybody you don't like.
On some level the brightest ones, though still not very bright, know this and try to hide behind the figleaf of 'well it was one of yours, so that doesn't apply'. They know it makes no sense and the narrative will quickly crumble as it did for the Butler shooter and the tranny ones. Even though it makes no sense and there's glaring evidence to the contrary, people like that FBI guy at the Butler hearing will get in front of congress and obfuscate the fact of the shooter's obvious political allegiances, by eg. trying their damnedest to memoryhole their social media history.