I'm glad that it makes sense in-game and isn't random. Very nice list lol.
Lol okay I won't say that's good but there is a certain charm to it. When I was a little high school cretin post-hardcore was a thing and I fondly remember bands with songs named like, "I Didn't Say I Was Powerful, I Said I Was a Wizard"
Wikipedia is not a source, it's an aggregate and I'd been trying to direct the conversation toward the source the entire time. You are so verbose it's hard to believe you are actually that stupid, which is why I call it pilpul, which puts you at being like every two out of a hundred people.
In crypto part of what an investor looks at is how its minted. This is why mining was popular. Anyone who could mine got in on a share of the new mint entering the economy. I bring it up because with US dollars, we pay jews to print the dollars, then we borrow and reborrow the same money with interest twice over if we want that money to make a pit stop before it circles back to jews. This creates a net negative economy of debt (read: goyim slavery) as the interest is not minted: more debt exists than currency and there is zero chance for everyone to be out of debt ever.
Horizon zero dawn dead
Naming conventions for games have suffered along with every other convention for like 15 years now
When I was into crypto I learned it costs like $1500 to get a mid range youtuber to simply say whatever you want. It is a prostitution/marketing website.
I frontloaded my point so that others would see it at a decent place in the comment chain. It was a charitable post that provided you with an opportunity to turn leaf and enter an honest discussion. The universe is always offering that to people like you. You choose to ignore that and stick to your initial pilpul, but that is expected and not my problem.
did you just heckin post heckin wikipedia
Did you just heckin neglect to include a heckin argument?
is that your defense
Not on trial.
dude weed
Waste some other goy's time.
I don't agree with this. There are plenty of jewish who have nothing to do with anything, and they have something in common with us in that their future and prosperity have been put on the table as a bet in a game played by psychopaths.
I tend to browse /tv/ and read threads about the sci fi shows I've seen, and the gay black doctor has made it basically impossible for Who-ites to have a decent thread for like a month straight now lol.
It happens to be a landing pad for escaping censorship (the arete.network domain) as well as being a tool that allows users to hold moderators to some level of accountability, so it makes perfect sense that the je- I mean, that the jannies, wouldnt like it
Thank you for this post and recommendation. Idk if I wanna buy a book on it (or pirate from a decent publisher) but maybe I'll come around to it... since it sounds like something full of information that would improve my kung fu.
Hey didn't we already skip these middle-posts at the beginning of my last post? That was supposed to save us both time, cat.
wikiepaedoia!?
Tough titty, cat. It's a list of claims and sources. If you're not questioning the claim or source itself you might as well not wax No True Scott about a website they appeared in.
I think your non-reply on whether the PDF would be significant to you answers both of our questions about natural motive, if you think about it. I lack the motive to talk about it much more than I already have.
Let's skip a few posts. If you had a PDF of the book in question and of the code for libel in the USA, would that be meaningful to you or affect your natural biases or your opinion on any of the subject matter in any way?
I was not born with the opinions I have. It's easy to be a curious person from my position. Far from being some kind of violation, Rule 16ing my race and accusing us of a worldwide "intertemporal" conspiracy based on ethnicity was a core aspect of my entire education about myself from childhood to degree.
That's the starting point and the motive to learn more and move on from that position is natural, just as someone who happened to be on the other side of the pond would have a perfectly natural motive to deny, discredit, or simply ignore the very same information. I see it as a ying and yang deal and a perfectly mundane example of reality being plain and obvious.
Are you challenging the veracity of the source? Let me think, maybe the converted jewish author of the book deliberately misquoted the gentle, Christian-loving pornographer Mr. Goldstein, making him seem evil, wrongfully, before getting his permission to print the misquote and attribute it directly to him?
Posted in reference to this thread: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17tLKP8yFI/x/c/4ZCaZkRelGh
If I make a really shitty pb&j sandwich it's still categorically a pb&j sandwich, even if you might protest that it is well below the traditional standards of sandwichhood
Ah nice I totally forgot about her.
Can you name one good Trump pick for any position at all? I've become disenchanted with the guy but I am a little disturbed at the fact that I can't think of one. In the end, I can only think of snakes.
My memory is clouded by picks like the head of exxon, the ex head of the cia, 30 pieces of silver Pence, omarosa, barret, kavanaugh, fauci (not technically his pick but he created the pedastal for fauci during covid), mad dog mattis, and that one time he brought in some eceleb troll on the teir of Martin Skrelli/Milo Yiannopolis who immediately started making ridiculous statements and got fired. I can't remember his name.
What are some good picks?
Kirby and the Every Single "Death Camp" the Americans Investigated Was Downgraded to "Concentration Camp"
Perhaps they hit him with "I really don't support what israel is doing, I think it is genocide" and got reported for SUPPORTING HAMAS
Wow its almost as if he is a jewish person of wealth and influence batting for his own team and gatekeeping right wingers. I wonder if that is very rare...
FROM MEMORY
Alan Dershowitz
Dennis Prager
Michael Savage
Mark Levin
Brit Hume
Greg Gutfield
Laura Ingraham
Larry King
Katie Couric
Matt Drudge
Glenn Greenwald
David Rubin
Laura Loomer
Bill Krystol
Chaia Raichic (libs of tik tok)
Now that does bite, but I will go with the flow on this particular psyop if it is one. I don't always have to choose "no", my rationale is not blown to the wind when someone chooses to abuse it.
Well then I wish the Sauds would pay more senators better wages for a little bit. That sounds like I support corruption but a duopoly is better than an exclusive deal.
The whole point is weak, I suspect, because people infer the Sauds are ass deep in Israel/USA, though I don't know much about that, so, idk. It's a fair criticism, it's just that I think in terms of alternatives to the status quo and I think of them in terms of achievability .
Lol it is a quote from a book. The very first words in the text explain the source. You displayed zero interest in that.
I can only imagine what your rationale for responding is at this point beyond impotently convincing yourself you won le internet argument or pretending to be retarded to waste my time.