Who wrote the sources that wikipedia used to claim that Leo Frank was innocent?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Seriously. How guilty do you have to be for the 1913 Atlanta lynch mob to say, "that African-American gentleman is innocent!"
Lets not contribute to the historical falsehood that White people were simply irrationally biased against Africans. They were a kind and charitable Christian people.
No one is accusing them of having an irrational bias. Pattern recognition wasn't invented in 2000.
Why are you capitalizing black?
I figured doing it in the context of a joke about a fictitious quote from a 1913 Atlanta lynch mob made it even more ridiculous? Hint: that's not the word they'd pick.
Here, I'll fix it for you.
Woah there buddy did you just post heckin wikipedia? Paging Dr. u/AntonioofVenice, quick, Leo Frank is jewish and needs your help.
As flawed as u/ger111 is, at least he is criticizing Wikipedia rather than taking it as Gospel truth as you did.
But I like that weeks afterward, you still haven't forgotten that blindly citing Wikipedia will get you criticized, as it should, as it will.
But what is he criticizing about it? A... source?
Is he claiming that Wikipedia is wrong, or not? And if he is, how can you justify taking everything on there on blind faith as long as it fits your small-mustached ideology?
Strawman, link it, quote it
Quote from the OP; "who wrote the sources that wikipedia used"
..
More interesting than Wikipedia is the possibility that we might agree on the issue at hand: that an unbiased source might reflect the idea that jew Leo Frank tampered with and/or faked parts of his dead daughter's private diary to sell for a profit, and that this action happened to assist in perpetuating a status of victimhood among the jews, being that the resultant propaganda would be distributed to warn young white children about the horrors of white nationalism, in the context of it resulting in the Holocaust, for decades and decades.
Not that any of this necessarily implies Leo Frank's individual actions involved any collective conspiratorial intent on the part of groups who definitely not enjoy special protections on internet forums everywhere today.
Im just glad that we can speak freely and openly about it, since if people had to jump through hoops it would validate and lend credence to disgusting theories of hatred in an infinite feedback loop, perhaps even ironically dooming the group in question. Luckily that's not the case, as indicated by the clear and concise nature of this post.
You brought it up, so it seems like you know full well what happened.
Yes, so he's criticizing it, as opposed to blindly citing it as you did.
Your delusions are not 'possibilities', and Hitler was not a white nationalist.
Topic Status: avoided by obsfucation
Jew Status: defended by omision
Pil Status: pul'd
Oh yeah, it's Antonio time
You're quite the master of obfuscation yourself, citing Wikipedia as a reliable source and then wanting to talk about anything but that.
Me, why is there an issue?
Leo frank was a pedophile rapist jew and all the jews got mad that they killed him for raping and murdering a little girl instead of letting him rape and murder a child because jews are child rapist murderers.
Not to mention perfectly willing to let an innocent black man take the blame for it.
Everyone is at risk when jews are around, it would seem.
They didn't have a homeland so they fucked over every place they were in, until they were kicked out. Then through untold death and destruction, they were given their very own home, so they wouldn't fuck over everyone else, and they promptly proceeded to infiltrate everywhere else and continue to fuck them over...
History is quite clear. There is peace, or them - but neither the two seem to meet.
You forgot to mention that the ADL was founded as a direct response to the accusations against him. If not for that fact, I doubt he would be seen as historically significant.
Low quality post is low quality. Given how much racialism there was in society at the time it is entirely possible that Leo Frank was wrongfully convicted by white nationalists.