-2
AntonioOfVenice -2 points ago +1 / -3

Susie Wiles is credited with the Trump campaign's effectively ruthless destruction of Ron DeSantis in the 2024 GOP primary.

Then we're screwed, because I can't think of anything more stupid than calling a guy "Ron DeSanctis" and "Meatball Ron" and siding with Disney.

Alvin Bragg should be credited with the destruction of Ron DeSantis in the primary.

The main concern I have about Susie Wiles is whether she is an establishment infiltrator.

If she didn't sink him in 2016 and 2020, she won't do it now... I assume.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your logic has no power here.

What, you think they looked at this in good faith and said: "I say, Jeremy, this late unpleasantless sure looks like a good old-fashioned insurrection." Of course not. They got it the same place they got 'global boiling', 'climate catastrophe', "you're killing grandma", racist, Russia collusion, etc.

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +9 / -0

As the case moved through the court, Greene’s staff kept her updated as Morelli remained on house arrest, pleaded guilty, and six months later, received his sentence: three months in prison.

So 1/6 of what the "QAnon Shaman" got for not being violent. 1/72 of what the people got who weren't even in DC for the insurrrrrrreeeeeeeecsha.

On one of those days, an inmate pulled him aside and told him there was someone he should meet. It was another prisoner, named Patrick Stedman, who had only just arrived. Stedman was serving four years because he was part of the insurrection on Jan. 6. He had been convicted of obstructing an official proceeding at the U.S. Capitol, where, according to the Department of Justice, he roamed the halls for more than 40 minutes, entered Pelosi’s office, took photos of himself on the Speaker’s Balcony, shouted, “Let us in!” outside the House chamber and later posted on social media, “The storm is here.”

Wow, that's some really serious case of Misdemeanor Parading.

Morelli said okay, but as they introduced themselves to one another, here was the embodiment of all the people he’d seen on TV who had made him angry. But Stedman wasn’t on the TV. He was standing across from him, face to face. Morelli expected him to sound the way he imagined all Trump supporters — as a radical, “hating everybody.” And yet, the more they talked, the more Morelli liked him. He didn’t seem hateful at all. He seemed smart. He had a business and a young family at home. He said he planned to spend his time in prison reading and detoxing from the news, and Morelli thought that was a good impulse, to get away from the anger that had surrounded them both.

Unintentional admission that the media brainwashed this guy.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't make the mistake of believing that they actually advocate for 'the oppressed'. The reason BLM was so successful is because the regime was already on its side. The people who advocated for BLM were just doing the regime's bidding. That's why they were allowed to torch cities and loot stores.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not IQ, it's the path of least resistance. Even if it could happen to them later, why bring regime wrath down on themselves now?

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +7 / -1

Why hasn't death taken this old fuck yet?

Only the good die young, and his heirs are worse anyway.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +5 / -1

Please explain how pointing out that Soros funding soft on crime prosecutors, and being the number 1 donor to Biden and the Democrats, and funding organizations destabilizing and undermining globalist-unfriendly governments is a "Jewy conspiracy".

I'll await your intelligent and cogent response.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +9 / -1

I don't necessarily disagree with you on the Soros matter, but you are definitely wrong about Benedict. He was forcibly recruited into the Hitler Youth, which is not the army, against the resistance of Catholics, who for years had attempted to protect Catholic education against Nazi attempts to abolish it.

Given your usual stubbornness, you'll not accept that you're wrong, but you are.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +9 / -1

A lot of zionist Jews (as well as others) are globalists. Most of the US ruling class is both zionist and globalist. There's really no contradiction there.

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +10 / -1

It still is.

The pro-Israel right is complaining about Soros. The pro-Israel left isn't.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of people won't like hearing that they're on the same side as Soros.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, actually the argument was “the MOSSAD (i.e. a jewish intelligence agency) ran a child rape blackmail ring against influential goyim”. The post-fact attempt to understand that looks back to their culture defining holy book.

The Mossad is the Israeli intelligence agency. It's silly to think that intelligence agencies are defined by religion. Do you think those of the US or Egypt are defined by Christianity or Islam?

Furthermore, I don't see how allegedly entrapping "goyim" to have sex with 15-year-olds has anything to do with Jews wanting to rape 2-year-olds.

Then explain that^ genius

My god, you're actually citing WIKIPEDIA? And you're doing so wrongly. There are far more European feminists there than Jewish feminists. And like I said, if it were just the Jews, they wouldn't accomplish anything. You like to scapegoat them for universal problems.

Ok lmao, not very hard bro here is the first paragraph on wiki:

Another citation of WIKIPEDIA?

central text - primary source - guide for daily life

But you were claiming they follow the Talmud and not the Old Testament. You haven't even come close to demonstratng that?

No... on the first article which grabs you on the Unz Review:

On what subject...

FOH lol what kind of rat logic is this. If you don’t know the facts of the case you aren’t really in any position whatsoever to judge people with opinions on the matter.

Let me explain. If people who shout "GAS THE JEWS" also complain about topic X, and only they, I'll not take topic X seriously.

Next you’ll tell me that only nut jobs have opinions on 9/11 foreknowledge/inside job!

Mostly. Foreknowledge wouldn't surprise me, but what sane person has advocated for that?

17
AntonioOfVenice 17 points ago +18 / -1

I know you're a troll and believe none of the opinions you purport to hold, but yeah, the people who oppose this d o support seizing assets when it's not theirs:

JP Morgan Chase last week sued VTB in New York to halt its efforts to recover $439.5 million from an account that was blocked after Russia despatched its army to Ukraine in 2022 and VTB was hit with sanctions.

28
AntonioOfVenice 28 points ago +28 / -0

A Russian court has ordered the seizure of funds in JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab bank accounts in Russia, court filings showed on Wednesday, in a lawsuit filed by state-owned bank VTB (VTBR.MM), opens new tab as it seeks to regain funds blocked abroad.

JP Morgan Chase last week sued VTB in New York to halt its efforts to recover $439.5 million from an account that was blocked after Russia despatched its army to Ukraine in 2022 and VTB was hit with sanctions.

So Russia is trying to get stolen funds back, and the media frames this as "Russia victimizing poor JP Morgan".

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not really, the trafficker/pimp has greater culpability than the John or victim/prostitute in literally every jurisdiction on earth. But again you manage to deftly avoid the point with a swift and substanceless “no u”.

Not if you try to argue that "Jews want to have sex with 2-year-old kids", which appeared to be your argument. Your argument for that cannot be running a blackmail ring recruiting non-Jews for that.

I see you still haven’t looked into the origins of feminism, transgenderism, sexual depravity, and myriad other forms of the degeneration of western culture.

It's childish to think that acceptance of any of that can be accomplished by a minority that is 1% of the population.

The talmud supercedes the Torah in rabbinic judaism. No one consults the Torah for direction, they consult their rabbi who consults their talmud. That’s the point of rabbinic judaism.

Yeah, I don't think that you can back that up. I'd be very surprised if you can.

Have you ever deeply asked yourself how a gay jew could have such a different opinion than you of his own “nation”?

Not at all, as I have a different opinion from my own 'nation'. It's good to view people as individuals. That said, I have noticed that he will say things that are so extreme that if said by a non-Jew would be labeled as anti-Semitic, and even by a Jew if they were not trying to ignore him to death.

I’d be interested in your thoughts because the authors posted there tend not to pull anywhere near as many punches as you’re likely used to in your regular edgy centrist discourse.

On Israel? I listen to a lot of people who are anything but 'centrist', Glenn Greenwald not being the only one. I follow folks on Twitter, like Aaron Mate, who label Biden as 'Genocide Joe' for his support of Israel. I just don't find it persuasive.

Dude they literally identified the ship as American then tried to sink it, and succeeded in murdering dozens of AMERICAN NAVY MEN. How could you possibly justify any feeling on that subject other than (rabid) “hate”. I’d love to hear this. And do try to put yourself in the shoes of an American for this one and not some aloof eurofag who decries the American empire or whatever the fuck your first instinct is to get out of this one.

I don't know about the case, other than the fact that some people obsessively bring it up. My point wasn't even that Israel was justified, or that I don't care about an American ship. It's that any mention of the USS Liberty tends to be accompanied by rabid Jew-hatred.

Let's say Israel did identify the ship as American and shot at it anyway, even though I don't see what it could have to gain from it. How exactly does that justify someone hating his Jewish neighbor who had nothing to do with it? I don't hate you for the actions of the American government, nor do you hate me for the actions of the vassal puppets called European governments.

12
AntonioOfVenice 12 points ago +13 / -1

Budget deficit? AFUERTA!

Honestly, I thought he was crazy - and his recent alleged conversion to Judaism doesn't exactly take that suspicion away - but he's been more successful than even his wildest proponent expected. Now let's see if this holds.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +4 / -2

Those Indian bastards poisoned themselves in order so they could blame it on eeeevil white disease-carriers. So crafty.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"WE'RE WHITE. WE DON'T HAVE A CULTURE."

7
AntonioOfVenice 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unconscionable that Border Control thinks that immigrants are horses.#TrumpIsAFascist #Twitler #CheetoVoldemort

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Articles ending with "report says" generally filled with lies, experts say

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except you (used to?) call me a sToRmFaG for presenting the same historical arguments.

I called you a Stormfag for very different reasons, perhaps things that you just said because you thought it would rile me up.

I think you’re being a little too broad when you just assume that everyone who feels this way is an unthinking racist. They may since have descended into unthinking racism on the subject, but I would wager many if not most got to that point through applied logic initially, saw that the subject was not ((allowed)) to be discussed logically, and decided “well if they don’t why should I” - or something along those lines

This sounds logical, but I wouldn't be sure on the percentages. It doesn't help that nearly everyone who, say, talks about the USS Liberty tends to a rabid Jew-hater. At the same time, I've seen people wonder about the Holocaust: they lie about everything else, so why would that be true. Besides, they try to silence everyone who argues otherwise, and that's how a guilty mind acts.

If all I know about a given topic was that "the regime is trying to censor side X", I'd say that side X was probably in the right.

So you’re victim blaming? Yikes. Do better sweaty.

Leaving satire aside, almost everything has a reason or a cause. It doesn't mean that it is sufficient justification for the reaction.

Wrong. They don’t follow “the OT”, they follow the talmud. That’s the definition of rabbinic judaism.

Do you mean that they don't follow the Old Testament at all? That is certainly wrong. You might argue that the Talmud has equal standing with the OT, because I recall it being called the 'oral law' as opposed to the 'written law' of the OT - but the other claim would be preposterous.

Yeah no shit, who else could expose evil from within but for someone within already.

Right, but that doesn't work if you were to argue - which it seems you don't - that Jews are inherently evil by virtue of their ethnicity, rather than their religion being no good.

Are you ((again)) trying to insinuate that I’m looking at this solely through a racial lens? You’d be a fool to.

That's good, but it is a legitimate assumption because it holds for 99% of people here who don't like the Jews.

You should look up Ron Unz of the Unz Report, Henry Makow, Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, among others for some modern day jews with integrity. Sounds like you could do with some exposure to thoughts outside your comfort zone.

I watch Greenwald's show almost every day. I agree he has integrity. I just disagree with him on Israel.

If you found one who was running his operation on behalf of a White intelligence agency for the purpose of collecting blackmail on influential non-whites*

That would implicate non-whites more than whites.

Literally thousands of years of accusations of satanic ritual child abuse.

By Jews? Less than a thousand, actually. I believe 1144 was the first one. And of course, none of them are in any way credible. The only way you could rightly accuse Jews of child abuse is what they do to their own children.

-5
AntonioOfVenice -5 points ago +2 / -7

A few times a year? That's nothing to worry about. And even with all this diversity bullcrap, it's way safer than driving - which is not to justify how they are making it unsafe.

EDIT: Not triggered by the downvotes, but I'm very curious what people disagree with. Can someone explain?

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lmfao, dude, don’t be so disingenuous:

Dude, talking about Internet Stormfags. Don't pretend that they know anything of history.

But you never seem to want to discuss any potential causes for their situation beyond “goyim bad”.

And where did I say that? There are plenty of causes. Middlemen minorities are hated everywhere, as Sowell has demonstrated.

Wrong, it is the holy book of Rabbinic judaism. Like hadiths if every muslim agreed on them. Nothing like “early church fathers”

The Old Testament is the holy book of Rabbinic Judaism. Not sure why you're comparing it to the hadiths. The church fathers provided guidance on how to interpret the Bible, just like the Talmudists did for the Old Testament.

(tangentially, many of whom had based opinions on that matter, but that’s neither here nor there).

Actually, zero of them would have said that Jews are bad on account of their race or lineage. They just said that their religion is wrong, which is perfectly legitimate. They were far too close to the time when nearly all Christians were ethnic Jews to condemn an entire people based on their race. Hell, that disputation you cited, as well as Tortosa, was conducted by a converted Jew.

Well it seems they were trying

Muslims were trying to eff off back to their own countries? Could have fooled me.

Shit dude did you miss that whole Epstein raping kids for the mossad thing?

This in defense of the idea that "the Jews want to rape 2-year-old kids"? All I have to do is present one white pedo and you'll say this proves that whites want to rape 2-year-old kids? Be serious.

I bet you would have supported the austere religious scholar Bin Laden in his holy religious crusade against communism, had you existed as anything more than a sample of jizzum at the time. You seem far too easily swayed by the ramblings of ((intellectuals)).

"Intellectuals" generally back Islam...

view more: Next ›