17
AntonioOfVenice 17 points ago +17 / -0

What happened to Trump around June 1?

  1. Bombing Iran and supporting an attack on the country he was negotiating with
  2. Slamming Tulsi and forcing her to lie about WMDs (not to excuse her)
  3. Sending weapons to Ukraine
  4. Epstein cover-up.

Why would you brave 2 impeachments, 91 indictments, 2 assassination attempts, only to give the people doing that everything they wanted?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its not, but its also that hypocritical line where blacks can write a million albums about how awful the hood is, how every nigga a thief or killer, and the like but you can't dare say "I don't really like these ghetto people much" without them exploding. They put their worst stereotypes of Jews in the media to lovingly mock themselves, and get pissed when people remember those stereotypes and mock them with them (lovingly or not).

But I still don't get how you view that as "pushing Jews in your face" then - that's the way I read your original complaint. It's like me claiming that white people going around and saying "IM WHITE AND WE SUCK" is somehow making me notice the influence of white people. No, it's just annoying.

I don't think half the stereotypes of Jews in the modern culture would exist if Jews themselves didn't tell us about them, like with their inlaws (I think the meme of inlaws being evil comes from Jews projecting) or their hawkish, asexual women.

Oh, I'm pretty sure the in-law thing is pretty universal. Where I'm from, something like half the folk tales feature an evil stepmother.

Not really. Some people can clock reliably but in general a lot of people are in the zone of "I must be on the lookout" which means they find things they'd never have otherwise noticed. Its ironically the reverse of the problem where "all tomboys must be FTM" and now into "all ugly/imperfect girls must be MTFs." This is all in pictures of course. In audio or motion the little signs are a lot more glaring.

Well yeah. When you can hide it with photoshop, you increase the number of false positives and negatives. I don't think it's really analogous to people wanting desperately to prove that basically anyone they don't like is a Jew.

When I say that there are a lot of white people who trash whites, they'll say: no, they're all Jews. That's what I mean. It's a confirmation bias. When you shout "OY VEY" whenever a Jew says something you don't like, nothing when a non-Jew says something you don't like, and nothing when a Jew says something that you do like (subject to some exceptions), well yeah, then you can make that credible to yourself.

This is all in pictures of course. In audio or motion the little signs are a lot more glaring.

LITTLE? My, aren't we a LITTLE understating things.

For all people like to dab on him, they really aren't much better than our boi Imp. He could never give a solid answer to "what then" once you pushed past his ranting about women, other than throwaway stuff like artificial wombs or the like.

To be fair, I don't have a solution for the problems I diagnose either, other than "everyone should agree with me and join in to root out evil". But I think diagnosing actual problems is superior to scapegoating some groups for it, and simply assuming that when you disappear women or the Jews, that all problems will disappear with them. That's childish.

Its often the same here, they are simply high on their justice boners and have no further thoughts beyond "we kill them all and then society goes back to normal and my life improves and there is a parade." And maybe killing them all is the necessary move, but its never that simple and we can't change course once we start and the consequences roll in hard.

Aside from the moral objections to 'killing them all', they'll just be replaced by equally bad whites/blacks/etc. Of course, you might have so much power in this fantasy universe that you'd prevent that. But then you can just prevent bad guys from having power to begin with, and you wouldn't need to kill them at all, or at least not all, only the people who are truly bad actors.

If you yell "everything is fucked!" long enough, eventually you'll be right a couple times. That's not good ammunition, its them repeating until probability throws them a bone. I could say "every man is a rapist" and probably catch quite a few, but we both know that says nothing about my belief being valid.

Not saying that historical doomers were right, but that people can be forgiven for thinking that things are going very poorly at the moment, for reasons I'll specify in future paragraphs.

Like, my expectations for Trump were quite low and he is still exceeding them greatly. Because of that, I am not in utter despair about his current actions. Disappointed for sure, but still quite content.

Same for me. Most appointments, the J6 people, the quick acting on DEI transgenderism were way beyond my expectation.

But then, Epstein, weapons to Ukraine, bombing Iran, Tulsi selling out, the other great appointments selling out (Patel et al.). My expectations were very low, but I expected at least what he did in his first term: start no new wars - including giving the green light to his 'greatest ally'.

They watch far too much political content and news, and lose track of the fact that most people not only don't do that, but its rotting their brain into being constantly stuck in that mode.

Yup. It's all pointless anyway. It does me no good at all to 'read political content', except as entertainment, which is how I treat it.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Easy, since everyone skips the titular character's pompous monologues.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hillary? No way. I meant that weirdo they ran last time.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget Zarna Joshi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzA4dCT4X0I

Or Anneliese Nielsen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ZTNTZ2JZI

But Broshi is the greatest of the great. I mean, Roa is just spouting a line. Broshi is MELTING DOWN like there's no tomorrow.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's absolutely hilarious. Aggression + negative charisma = massive lolz

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some people like torture. The best of these debates is where Cenk Uygur debates Rabbi Shmuley. Two absolute rage-machines going at each other. It's a work of art.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Uncontested number one is of course Robin Broshi, a New York education official who had a meltdown because someone in a meeting who had the temerity to be white had a black baby on his lap.

BTW: to get at the relevant section, you have to open the link at the top - if you open the embedded video, it just starts the video from the start for some reason.

11
AntonioOfVenice 11 points ago +11 / -0

Question: what would people on a left-wing forum have said in 2013 about the 2016 GOP nominee?

As for my own stupid prediction: they pick who's next in line.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's quickly becoming apparent that the revulsion the Powers That Be have towards the Holocaust was not because it was a genocide per se, but that it was a genocide targeting European Jews in particular (or in major part)

Actually, there's an easier meter. It was a genocide committed by geopolitical foes. That means it's bad.

Same rule there's for everything else. Human rights violations by Russia? War started by Russia? All bad. By fbuddies, it's all good.

Look at how there's so few people trying to get the Turks to pay reparations for the Greek and Armenian genocides, for example.

Don't forget the Assyrian Genocide. All of which are denied by Turkey, by the way. So NATO ally of the Westoid empire Turkey is at the same level as a Holocaust denier, except that these people have no power and denial of Turkey's holocausts is state policy.

They also don't mind that Turkey occupies half of Cyprus.

Why? Ally. If Turkey were to fight with the US, all this would come out instnatly.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course what they say makes no sense. Neither side is based on logic or empathy. It's just ego and self-gratification.

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

How common is women messaging dudes while being married? Incredibly common.

How do you know that?

How common is women selling out thier family for a weird fetish?

Tell me about it.

It's at least not zero

Basically nothing is 'zero'. To claim that some infinitesimal phenomena prevent men from marrying is very stupid.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Ukraine was a creation of the Soviet Union

If? So you don't know any of the history. You're just a Ted Cruz who knows nothing about the countries you want to depopulate. Like most Ukraine morons, you can't even find the non-country on a map.

Putin seeks to reinvigorate and revive the Soviet Union,

Do keep up, that's what you easily manipulated Russia Derangement Syndrome fools keep screaming.

because of his ineffectual attempts

If so, why are you fat Americans screaming about it so much?

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +14 / -8

my brother's wife has been messaging with hundreds of different inmates through a dozen different apps for the last 2 years. she's sent photos, tens of thousands of dollars, shares her location, tells them where her kids go to school, living an entire second life.

Just how common is this sort of thing? Men are not getting married because this one guy's wife is a whackjob?

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not what hamas believed. There was a ceasefire in May 2021 that lasted until 2023. Once it was broken, hamas did what terrorists do.

But they broke it. And where did Hamas even claim that they attacked because of the East Jerusalem matters?

Sounds kind of like a degenerate drug-fueled EDM festival to me.

Maybe, music festivals generally are. But what's the point?

I'm always bemused at the outrage that "THEY KILLED YOUNG PEOPLE AT A MUSIC FESTIVAL"... as opposed to killing people in a kibbutz who spent their free time driving Gazans to hospitals in Israel so they could get better medical care.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I would argue that it's always been about utter domination.

If you look at the relations with Egypt, or even Jordan, it's different. Israel gave back the Sinai to Egypt, and I read (haven't verified, may be a complete lie) that it offered the Gaza as well but Egypt refused.

Compare that to Syria and Lebanon.

Dangerous neighbourhood? They chose to move there

Some did, some were expelled from Arab countries. But their choice doesn't negate the fact that it is.

They chose to reject the UN partition plan

You are mistaken. The Arabs rejected the UN partition plan, which just led to more loss of land and mass expulsions. You might argue the they were justified, but they did all the same.

No my friend, they want you to think something changed, but it's always been like this.

Actually, they don't. They want you to believe that they're still the underdog. They were comparing the size of Israel to Iran just a few days ago, and claiming to be David vs. Goliath.

Yes, it's from an unz article (and I'm totally shocked Google would rank it lower..): https://www.unz.com/runz/zionist-israel-as-the-assassination-nation/

I'll take a look at the book that it cites.

12
AntonioOfVenice 12 points ago +12 / -0

I assume that if this were to happen (and it's a big if, this defense minister guy is widely considered to be a low IQ clown), that people in the Westoid areas would start to argue that not all concentration camps are hideous, and that they predate Nazi Germany. All of it true in part, but all if it will be contradicting all the stuff they've been saying for years.

If another country takes them, I'm guessing it's going to be Syria. That Al Qaeda guy has been such a friend to Israel that Trump said that Bibi requested that he lift sanctions on Israel. He's allowing Israel to occupy parts of Syria and to demolish homes to build military installations, and to bomb Syrian army assets at will, and reportedly also allowed Israel to use Syrian airspace for its attack on Iran.

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

They've always been this way, not just in the wake of Oct 7.

Something changed. All restraint is loosed, and it has become the Israel the Israel-haters claimed it was before.

They have always been psychopathic terrorists.

Always? They live in a dangerous neighborhood, and if you did, you'd do whatever it takes to survive. The difference now is that they're not aiming for survival and safety, but utter domination.

Did you know that in the early 1980s mossad rigged up the Beirut sports stadium with explosives to blame on the PLO

I can't find the original source for your quote. Is it Unz? Interesting how Google seems to rank it rather lower.

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

They might think that, but the death toll numbers are nowhere near comparable.

Didn't say that the death toll was comparable. It's pretty stupid to pick a fight with a power that has overwhelming military superiority and can act with such impunity.

Of course, no one in Israel after October 7 was considering what they had done to the Palestinians to make Hamas attack them like that - though I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with the East Jerusalem brouhaha. Just like few to no Americans after 9/11 sincerely questioned what America may have done to spark that attack.

Palestine has gotta pump those numbers up, those are rookie numbers in this racket.

They're not going to. You have a population that's starving, living in tents because nearly all buildings are destroyed or damaged, brutalized and traumatized. And if what the Israeli defense minister has announced, it might get exponentially worse for them.

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +1 / -4

Also, you know Christians are only slightly behind the Muslims.

In terms of population, or in terms of how much they're disliked? The latter is absolutely true. Many of the resistance fighters/terrorists have historically been Christians (albeit communists), before the rise of Islamism.

But let's wait and have Ted Cruz tell us why that's a good thing, before we jump to any conclusions.

Anti-semite. Blood libel. Don't you get between me and my $1.8 million.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +7 / -2

The mention of Joshua and the ancient Israelites seems gratuitous and intended to increase the 'yes' vote here - while it obviously doesn't excuse the answer.

Also interesting is this:

A majority of 56 percent of Jews supported the "transfer (forced expulsion) of Arab citizens of Israel to other countries."

They're always talking about how Arabs are full citizens of Israel with equal rights, which is mostly true, but then there's this.

view more: Next ›