Quite the coincidence, if true. Since May, Trump has bombed Iran, resumed sending weapons to fake Ukraine and suppressed the Epstein Files.
If you otherwise would.
It's so bizarre to me. In Europe, everyone knows that you generally can't be fired for opinions, so no one demands it of companies. If American companies grow a spine, they'll stop being deluged by vapid losers.
Frankly, I've never seen any positives for "kebab" immigration. The largest immigrant communities in Europe also have terrible food: Turks, Moroccans, Algerians, Syrians and Indians. So no "but their food is so delicious... MMMMMMMH".
Thing is, Indians aren't nearly as bad as other groups. This is empirically observable. You can look at England, where there are large numbers of Indians and Pakistanis, and guess who's worse? Of course, this isn't because of an artificial line in the sane, but because they're mostly Muslims, and because Islam in Pakistan is turbocharged by being hegemonic and government-supported.
Not telling anyone that he should or shouldn't like Indians, let alone that "we should take in more Indians" as I'm sure some people will read this as. Just my experience.
Worst country? I very much doubt that. There's Pakistan, Somalia, Gaza. Probably a good number of other places.
And Pakistani Muslims are an order of magnitude more unpleasant for the host country than Indian Hindus and Sikhs.
Because the normie conservative argument about immigration is about the legality of it
That's dumb. Europe was ruined through legal immigration.
Meanwhile the "model immigrants" were being imported legally and doing everything the illegal immigrants were doing, taking jobs, chain immigration, etc.
'Taking jobs' is bad for workers and great for employers, because it depresses wages. That's probably why they keep doing it. The rulers support it for the same reason we oppose it.
Would I fire this guy? Probably not. But if thousands of people beat down my door because I'm employing a fascist who wants to fire me eventually, why would I keep him around?
Because you're not a doormat and a coward? Why would you reward that sort of behavior, guaranteeing more of it?
Doesn't matter if you disagree with what you think. Support all people in the pit.
They're not wrong - they've hijacked the state and made the courthouse from public property to their private potentates.
He doesn't need to say who, the specific targets will come out through investigation & interrogation.
But there is no Epstein List, they say.
He also did name several people, iirc?
Right, as I said, but none who were on the Epstein List. That seemed like a true threat to me. But they also cited the 'threat' against the Epstein List.
Making global (broad, unspecified) threats of mass murder or serial killings is a problem worthy of investigation, yes? Threatening harm is not covered by the 1st.
I'd say yes, but it's not clear to me that this isn't covered when the Supreme Court allowed for specified threats to murder from a man against his ex-wife.
True enough, except for the fact that the rulers obviously aren't bringing in immigrants for "kindness".
That's how it is sold to stupid people, same as "democracy and freedom" in Ukraine... or Iraq.
Climate change killing polar bears is one of those zombie lies, like the wage gap, which they just keep repeatng no matter how often it has been repeated.
Actually, the one at the top (by a cross-dresser and sexual harasser who trooned out Charles Clymer) is rather reasonable. I can say the same. I don't care if Trump is in the Epstein Files. Release them.
Until a few years ago, I read nothing negative about Indians on 'right-wing' online spaces. Let alone 'jeet', which I thought was a race in the Elder Scrolls series.
Did I miss something, or did something change?
Wiles appears to be one of the worst actors in the admin. Too bad, she seems to be a good chief of staff for someone who churns through them like nothing.
He could threaten Martian Invaders, who clearly do not exist, but if he says "the Martians are at the local Walmart, I'm going to kill them all!" then the threat to innocent bystanders is very real.
He didn't say who was on the list though.
Yes, keep letting the Democrats score an own-goal on this one.
How very optimistic. This doesn't look like 952-dimensional chess to me, but just a plain cover-up in plain sight.
The files don't exist, no Obama wrote them, are you still talking? SHUT UP.
But then why would they not destroy the compromising data?
I wanted to say "because it's illegal", and then had a hearty laugh at my own expense.
Could be that you can't clean everything up. I read that a senator has flagged more than a billion transactions involving Epstein. That makes it clear where documents have been destroyed, even if you get them all.
Maybe they're protecting the lack of data, as in the fact that it was destroyed but even then why would they not be forthcoming about it, everyone would assume it was the Democrats did it.
Maybe it's not about Democrat/Republican, but about the whole ruling system.
Because they love ISIS and hate their political opponents.
No, let all the natives move out instead.
Do you really think so? Everything damning would have been destroyed already. My guess is that there is no client list left but the existing files implicates Mossad.
I think so. Maybe there indeed never was a 'Client List'. But people getting implicated in documents instead.
If everything damning is already destroyed, I don't think they would be so spergy about it. I mean, this makes you look guilty even if you weren't guilty.
I also don't believe that Trump was implicated, someone would have released that info already.
Who knows? Anything is possible after these past 1.5 months.
Excuse me, Pam Bondi has prepared video evidence that clearly shows she will have killed herself. Don't be a conspiracy nut.
There must be some really damning information there.
I can give one example. The Japanese Rail Pass is available only to people who don't live in Japan.
Of course, it's for a good reason (to boost tourism), and even with the discount it is still rather expensive, but it's no lie.
You're right. What a weird transliteration, because it is pronounced as 'kh' (as in Bach).
There's no Israeli here demanding that all Palestinians be killed.
But you are here, demanding that all Jews be killed.
Eh, Trump said that he didn't draw, even though there were other drawings by him at about the same time, and that he doesn't use the word 'enigma'.
On the Epstein issue, Trump's credibility is very low for me, so if it's him vs. the WSJ, I'm going with the WSJ.
This isn't even directly damaging, because the article itself downplays what kind of context it was in. But I can imagine Trump saying: "FAKE!!!! OBAMA WROTE IT! He wrote it in Hunter Biden's bathroom, it's disgusting! No release of this HOAX!" It explains everything about his behavior.