Strawman, link it, quote it

You brought it up, so it seems like you know full well what happened.

Quote from the OP; "who wrote the sources that wikipedia used"

Yes, so he's criticizing it, as opposed to blindly citing it as you did.

More interesting than Wikipedia is the possibility that we might agree on the issue at hand: that an unbiased source might reflect the idea that jew Leo Frank tampered with and/or faked parts of his dead daughter's private diary to sell for a profit, and that this action happened to assist in perpetuating a status of victimhood among the jews, being that the resultant propaganda would be distributed to warn young white children about the horrors of white nationalism, in the context of it resulting in the Holocaust, for decades and decades.

Your delusions are not 'possibilities', and Hitler was not a white nationalist.