And the enforcing and instilling of those values, even without violence, is a risk to our lives and against the "law".
It's now considered emotional/domestic/controlling abuse or phobic or sexist and yes you can go to jail, lose your job, your home,your family.
Discipline is verboten these days unless it's self imposed.
Women see callousness and bluntness in the same vein. Like when my grandfather died a couple of years ago, and as expected whenever the date rolls around my now ex would get all emotional, then call me callous or unemotional because I wouldnt join the pity party.
Having the perspective and understanding that they're dead, means you can be sad, without being an emotional wreck once a year. Same applies to a lot of things right down to "avoidant" behaviour of going camping or working on something.
They've mistakenly taught themselves that men have to "fix" everything which isn't true. We have to fix everything... IF we can. But first we assess.
Most I find don't even teach from the book. I've known several who have openly admitted to me, they simply Google activity packs or use "resources for teachers" websites.. said websites have no education authority or oversight...
Those contradictions are because that's what a tradcuck IS.
Imagine someone who wants the 2.4 nuclear family, picket fences house, mortgage, gun rights patriotism, church and prayer, following the Bible scripture. But then acts in contrary to all of that whilst bemoaning the death of traditionalism.
To cuck means in essence to give up on your own desires and best interests, to allow others to void things you hold dear.
In the case of a trad cuck, it's wanting a traditional life, while doing everything that prevents it.
Because they also still follow the "trad" lifestyle and desires, nuclear family, one works, one cares, 2.4 kids, church and prayer, gun ownership, "don't step on me", patriotism, military service praise. They are trad cucks because they say one thing and do another, they hold diametrically opposed lifestyles and choices. They CALL themselves traditionalists.
Where as a social liberal would call themselves a liberal...
Not even just women. But everyone. Every animal in the world keeps their own kind in line. This is what happens when someone is given free reign to avoid discipline and responsibility AND use it as a defense against even that being corrected.
It's Not a gendered thing because men correct and discipline each other all the time. Women do too (in extremely toxic ways, then conveniently ignore it.)
Reminds me of many post apocalyptica / rebooted world stories where "ancient relics of a bygone civilization" are misused because they're not understood.
Waterworld is a good example of this. There doesn't have to be understanding or homage or "cultural appreciation" of every damn thing.
The robots simply found texts and records of them being hats, when they found one in the street. Done. They found the purpose of the object. It's a hat. They treat it as such.
And honestly as humans, we'd do well to emulate this.
I love the hypocrisy of the social mob. Everything has to be multicultural and diverse and accepting,no lines or boundaries and then in the next breath of ore their own rules and deride you for if oring the cultural differences.
Just because they refuse absolute hand over of power doesn't mean they're not in bed.
Those are just examples of power play. The US Government wanted to be top not bottom. Apple said no. Because they get power and control over US lobbying when they "volunteer" information (even when court ordered, the gov has to approach first).
It also means the US gov won't have precedent to then use said backdoors against Apple itself.
Do not confuse self preservation with non compliance.
And even then there's different kinds of protein. The protein in bugs contains a lot of unkillable bacteria in them and a few of those bugs provide protein that has no nutrition value to humans.
It's not just a case of "protein good!".
Now look at it from their new push against farmers and "reducing nitrogen byproduct".
All the non recommended foods are "high" in nitrogen and CO2 production. All the recommended foods can be protein substituted or microfarmed in labs.
Darwin's survival of the fittest wasn't mased on the personal level. It's was a projection theory based on the macro or species level.
Darwinism in this case is saying these idiots are FAILING survival of the fittest as a human species.
If I was a woman, I'd find it rather degrading to be called a birthing Parent. I mean... What kind of MISOGYNISTIC person would reduce someone down to just one function, like giving birth or having gendered genitalia, or hair colour. Geez. /s
Tinfoil thought; the latest events Covid, Heat, law changes(that allow for idiots to die, like not arresting rioters, giving pedestrians right of way over cars), soon to be a fresh bout of food shortage. They're all population reduction events.
Each one aiming to intentionally reduce population?
Intentionally release virus and kill the feeble, by giving false information, or ever changing information.
Inte.tionally.giving that virus the ability to spread diseases that shouldnt spread that easily (aids, hepatitis, cardiovascular)
Heatwave not directly caused (useful side effect of solar farms, and who would have guessed excessively big glass towers would cause lensing effects), but again not actually doing much to help the feeble and at risk.
They can cause again another food shortage , blaming heatdeath of crops.
Intentionally ruin the value of money and labor so buying essentials like food, water, heating, cooling and causes loss of life that way.
Intentionally anger the populace so they risk their life fighting in civil war.
Population culling doesn't have to be a big grandiose military event.
Wouldn't surprise me if he gets to reinvent himself ala witness protection too.