The entire point of the Queer Theory movement is to attack normative behavior.
Like all the critical theories
Complex question historically, depends how tightly you define it. There are, and were, those who would exclude Italian from that definition. Irish too.
It's an element of clown world and the neopaganism/gaia worship ecocult.
Both the malthusian hatred for humans, and the pedestaling and worship of animals and nature.
You're not going crazy, your grandparents and their grandparents had a different morality to this. This is an aberration.
Send_it has a good point about animals and 'fur babies' being surrogate 'children' for the perpetually online, sterile and lonely too.
Michael knowles had a good point the other day, that yes, he's acting as the good cop, but look at the winks and nods, who has has on with him
And it's the bad cops, like jeffery mars the creepiest motherfucker you've ever seen, who is on tiktok, grooming your kids, getting them to cut ties with family, he's your family now, come into my private discord and we can chat about private things...
He's an actor, playing the good cop, but he is absolutely on board with the creepier ones.
Makes him all the more dangerous, and so mulvaney MUST be a target for rhetoric. You can look at jeffery marsh and immediately see it's evil. But mulvaney is the 'good' cop, leading people to marsh.
Yes but this answer implies that the other way is the best of both worlds. Female to male is his jam?
Cant wait for 20 years from now when they celebrate protecting trannys from whatever the next liberal degeneracy is.
You know what's coming next. The nambla-ites are next. The rebrandings as MAPS, their foundation of the LGBT alliance back in the 50s and 60s, their control of hollywood and academia... They've been building to this.
We might have a race riot or two and reparations before then to mix things up, but this stuff is visible on the horizon.
unironically, yes.
Technology and Science Secretary Michelle Donelan
Science doesn't mean science as we understand it, these people worship their warped perception of science, it is scientism. It is naught but modern-day witchcraft which justifies abortion and trying to turn men into women, and women into men, and which posits the existence of a 'soul' which does not fit the body, but which simultaneously tries to deny the existence of said soul, whichever is most convenient at the time. Classic witchcraft
They know the power of words, and wish to control speech and language for their own evil purposes.
Not just their existance, but the rise of perversity among the elites and pushed by freaks in unis in a formerly great but now comfortable and rotting society, the whole process is a tale as old as time.
We have been here before. Or rather, weinmar germany and rome have.
You don't even need to on a good model.
On a regular enough pose for hands and feet, just inpaint it, 50 iterations, 5 will be good enough. Pick the best.
Repaint, now not including that area...
You can just brute force it now. Even achieving specific ratios, get that ring finger a bit longer to show how much T their body has had flowing through it.
I prefer it this way
Obviously lying cunts with 0 respect, instead of clever basters that people trust.
The idea would be truthful and honest reporters, but that's too high a bar. But at lease if they're gunna lie, they're stupid about it. Or perhaps they just no longer feel the need to be so careful...
Turn the other cheek is not a call to rank pacifism. I do not buy that interpretation That would be contrary to his other teachings, carrying a sword and millstones
The interpretation that works best I think, it needs some cultural context. The romans were a society that ruled and lorded it over their provinces, being able to make people do work for them and carry stuff, and they would routinely slap their inferiors and slaves. They'd slap each other too, honour was a thing back then, but it was a different type of hit. Now also look at the middle eastern context even today. The left hand is dirty, it is for cleaning and toileting, it is unclean.
Now look at exactly what Jesus said, if they slap the right cheek. He didn't say the left, he didn't say a cheek, he said if they slap you on the right specifically. What you do as a subject of Rome in that region is in a way, resist, insist you are equals, and that if you're gunna fight and slap, they do so on the other cheek, with the clean hand, and like equals, as though it were with a fellow Roman.
To a roman, this is 'hateful', it is saying that non roman's are equal to they, at least, which is an unfathomable and disgusting thought to them. (I can see some parallels to today really)
The other lines near that one lend more strength to that interpretation. If you are pressed into service to carry something one mile, go two? Well that just sounds weak right? Well no. The Roman gov was conscious of the fact that the 'you must carry stuff for our soldiers' laws were being abused and creating more discontent, even they had limits. Their soldiers were only allowed to have the locals carry it so far, but no further. This is an act of defiance and perhaps mockery also, to offer another mile. If he takes you up on it, he has broken Roman law and disobeyed Caeser.
There is context to these that show they're, while not aggressive, they're a form of assertive resistance. They're all claims to dignity and resistance without recourse to violence really.
This also fits with the wise and clever interpretations of His teachings. There are numerous instances of the jews and pharisies against him trying to ensnare him in some legal trap with tricksy wording to get him in trouble before it was time or in a vain attempt to disprove his teachings, and Jesus would say a clever specific thing that would stump them. He's very careful and clever about wording, as is respected tradition at the time too, and we're 2000 years removed from the cultural context of some things and some gestures. He said right cheek specifically. So we should ask and explore why.
Of course they are welcome to do that in their own countries
Each and every one of them is a former Christian Catholic or pagan country, they are all stolen, pillaged and desolated lands.
They are welcome to do it nowhere, their evil pedophilic possessed 'prophet' was at best an insane murderer. He and his teachings are evil, and must be pushed back to the place from whence they came
'welcome to it in their own countries'. They have no lands that were not stolen. Enough with namby pamby 'moderate takes' which amount to tolerating devil worship. Dues Vult, push them back and reclaim Christendom.
verbose
Not at all. Succinctness is a virtue, actions are more important than words, we don't need to sit around discussing everyone's feelings just get the thing done.
It is a masculine virtue that should be cultivated.
It's more subconscious imo.
The quiet wellbehaved girl is rewarded for her natural behaviour (even if she is a scheming cunt, she's at least not actively fidgeting). She's also rewarded for reading more and being more verbose, as girls are. The boys' energy and physical learning needs are neglected, and the education is feminised, so they get even further agitated...
I'm 100% sure there is some intentional equity happening too. But it is on top of their natural in group bias.
Don't get me started on inclusion, this has been my bugbear for decades.
It's a massive overcorrection from the past that harms everyone. The kid with special ed needs gets sent to some random local school with no training and resources to handle them, while the other 30 normal kids get disrupted.
The past did slightly over segregate out the slightly special needs kids to be fair, a kid who could (and should) integrate with the rest of society, some mild cerebal palsy so he can't walk right? And that's it, not disruptive? Yeah ok he doesn't need to go to the specialist cerebral palsy school. The high functioning aspergers kid who just misses a lot of social cues, yeah he needs to learn to function in amongst the rest of society, him being there is a part of the therapy.
But the Deaf kid who needs an interpreter? They've closed the schools for the deaf and they each get issued an 'interpreter' with all of 6 months training in a level IV (FSI scale) language! It takes 2 years to qualify as an interpreter, and pass a test where you need 70% accuracy. 70% after 2 years, imagine what the 6 month old student is interpreting, they're getting 20%, at best.
What is the point, it's just disruptive to everyone.
Blackadder season 3 has him playing prince george, the epitome of upper-class twat. (Season 4 he's also a bit of a posh duffer, less than a prince, just a twit)
He played one.
Give it another 10 years, and none will be.