Glad the dog was found. Looks icy as hell there.
DFAS is fuckin stupid. Even if the CR expires tonight, the drill took place earlier in the month. They can't not pay because of the Antideficiency Act.
They have a black Superman movie from 1997, it's called Steel and starred Shaquille O'Neal.
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with that character, and if Warner Brothers had developed a long-term plan instead of just throwing out the Synderverse movies as fast as possible, they could have actually made another Steel movie riffing off the Reign of the Supermen storyline.
Now, it's probably too late. The MCU is collapsing under its own weight as audiences prove that giving C-Tier characters their own movies doesn't pay off, and superhero movie fatigue is setting in across the board.
the confines of a system conciously engineered for your destruction
This is so obviously the agenda of the Democrats, I don't know why it doesn't get more press in right-wing circles. Making DC and Puerto Rico states, pandering to illegal immigrants, threats to pack the supreme court- they're all pieces and a plan designed to permanently neuter Republican political power.
I think the Democrats honestly believe that if they can get a permanent 51%+ majority everyone is just going to have to shrug and take it while they outlaw guns, run white males out of the workforce, and teach your five-year-old that they should cut their dick off in school.
What they seem completely oblivious to is the fact that the prospect of the South becoming a permanently disenfranchised political underclass is what prompted the Civil War. Yes, it was about economics and about slavery, but if you look at how aggressively they debated whether new states entering the union would be free or slave in the years leading up to 1861, it was fundamentally about whether or not the slave states would have enough representation to safeguard their interests. When it became clear that they were going to lose that battle long-term, they decided to peace-out. Why the Democrats think it would be any different in the 21st century is beyond me.
It's not like she had huge tits to begin with. They just erased them completely.
Edit: I think someone got the impression that I'm OK with this. I'm not. What I'm saying is they took a character with an already modest bust and wiped it out completely.
Because I think the story is exactly what they presented. I'm not a fan of female privilege, but I think this is about England's fascist suppression of speech it doesn't like.
But you twist every story into an anti-female narrative. I just don't think it applies here.
Eh, I downvoted you. It's not hard to think that 28 others did too.
England has some stupid "male gaze" law. Accuse the arresting officers of eye-fucking you. If there's no audio recordings or cameras, accuse them of offering to make it all go away in exchange for a hummer. Use their own BS laws against them.
This is just the modern equivalent of whip makers or ice companies raging against progress that makes them obsolete.
Except for fine art, most "consumers" of art couldn't care less where it originated. Do you think anyone knows who drew the Star Wars poster you see in every Walmart's poster rack?(except maybe a Star Wars Super fan)
AI art has the potential to revolutionize all of the shitty work-a-day art we encounter in our daily lives, such as illustrations in manuals, box art on products, etc.
Since the consent to euthanasia was conditioned on "when she felt the time was ripe", once her cognitive abilities declined to the point that she could no longer participate in decision making that condition became impossible to meet. The consent should have effectively been revoked then and there.
The fact that they surreptitiously drugged her tells me that they knew they did not have her consent, further reinforced by her physical resistance when she became aware of what they were doing. I'm pretty sure this person would have been convicted in the US; the son in law too. And the civil trial- holy shit, the optics of shoving down a struggling 74-year-old woman so they can jab her with a needle with a lethal poison would make any plaintiff's attorney lick his chops.
Opponents of euthanasia have always said that it's a very short step from voluntary suicide to the state making the decision for you, for which they are roundly mocked as arguing a ridiculous slippery slope. But between this story and Canada actively trying to sell people on getting euthanized, it looks like they were right all along.
I honestly think it's so Israel can keep rubbing the Holocaust in everyone's faces. They need to drag these geriatrics into court so that they can constantly remind us about the Holocaust. I'm not sure how they managed to pawn off the actual trials to Germany and Poland in recent years though.
To be fair, I think what ForeignInvader is saying is that, regardless of genetic heritage, the people that live in today's Germany share a little in common with the country that fielded probably the greatest militaries in the world in both 1914 and 1939.
Regardless of their crimes in World War II, as a student of military history, I find it a source of both mystery and consternation to see the country that pretty much defined combined arms warfare and the foundations of how every modern military fights reduced to a place that had national angst over having to decorate their own soldiers for valor during the war in Afghanistan.
Likewise Japan. I don't know how the US did it, but our post war reconstruction of those countries was the spiritual equivalent of gelding a wild stallion.
He ought to do that for real. Turning Twitter into something that just spites Democrats would be priceless.
Everything new and innovative gets ruined. Netflix revolutionized the movie rental scene, first by having a massive catalog and mailing you movies, then by seamlessly pivoting to on-demand streaming.
So of course, the studios pulled their content off Netflix and created their own inferior copies of the service. Now Netflix is copying them and sticking ads in there. We're fast degenerating to the point where all these streaming services cost as much as cable used to and are chock full of ads. The only practical difference will be that the content is on-demand.
"you're hungry? Best I can do is chop your dick off."
instead of "immigrant" consider using "person who has immigrated"
Because turning one word into four, while still using the root word immigrate is super efficient and promotes clarity in writing. Tards.
This is the same person the left called an "Uncle Tom" because he didn't rule their way on key cases. Spoiled grapes from that lot.
I hate those things. They're everything that's wrong with the modern world marketing toys to adults rather than children:
-
They're ugly, and often unrecognizable as the character they're meant to represent without the label on the packaging
-
There's like a thousand of them, so someone would have to spend a fortune to collect them all. I think they have a bunch of exclusives too.
-
they've blended "universes" into incomprehensibility. "You like Spider-Man? How would you like Superman done in the same style? Now how about Seinfeld and that guy in the background from the Office?"
jobless men don’t act the way advocates of “universal basic income” have always promised they would — becoming caregivers, volunteering in their communities or pursuing artistic passions. The evidence from time-use surveys all suggests pretty strongly that people freed from the responsibility of work sit on their asses all day, do drugs and play video games. Who knew, right?
Good. The idea that there's nobility in performing labor is completely preposterous when that labor is simply to make a multinational corporation and the billionaires that control it even richer while feeding a feminist-facist government that hates you.
People work to put food on the table; if they found a way to scam the system and get money without working, more power to them. Withdraw from soyciety and become ungovernable.
Eh, they're a business. I'm pretty sure Walmart would kick out somebody standing in their doorway with a sign that said "Shop at Target" too.
The quote is from NATO's own website. Take your concerns to them.
Well, they're not outsourcing the work to India, they're bringing them over on tech worker visas.
Assuming equal skills, it makes sense: You have to pay an American $X in this job market, but foreigners are poor, so you can get away with paying them $X-Y, and they'll be happy because you also got them a ticket to the States.
There's a couple issues though: first, those guest worker visas were intended to help fill career fields that didn't have enough Americans working in them, not to help major corporations save money on salaries. The unintended consequence is that it depresses wages for the tech sector, because the American workers are forced to accept lower pay to compete with the foreigners taking their jobs.
Second, it changes the entire character of the company. In group preference is a real thing, as these imported workers rise to the ranks, they will hire more and more of their countrymen rather than similarly qualified Americans.
And, as you and others have pointed out, you get what you pay for with these employees, and it just lowers the quality of work all around as they become entrenched in the industry.
Nobody said Ukraine would or could join NATO prior to Russia's 2022 invasion. NOW, though? It's a certainty that Ukraine will.
Lies. NATO documents that it has been courting Ukraine since 1991 on its own website: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_37750.htm
They also stated their intent to add Ukraine to NATO in both 2008 and 2021 (again, from their own website):
We reiterate the decision made at the 2008 Bucharest Summit that Ukraine will become a member of the Alliance https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_185000.htm
That was 5 minutes of web searching. So, are you a paid shill or just a Ukrainian ex-pat true believer?
Looks like he'll be travelling to the 1920s jazz scene quite a bit. Maybe he can get a flapper companion.
Was it the ethnic group that represents 3.4% of the UK population, yet somehow has a minimum of one actor per show without fail that tipped you off?