2
SturmMilfEnthusiast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trannies are a tiny fraction, but progs are not. Progs aren't enough on their own either, but the majority of people are deeply afraid of being called bad people by the progs, so they act like a conquered people. Win the progs over, and their subjects come as a package deal.

8
SturmMilfEnthusiast 8 points ago +8 / -0

After all these years, I see Facegen in any context, and I still hear the first Oblivion dungeon track it plays during character creation.

11
SturmMilfEnthusiast 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think I was checked out around the time Ahsoka showed up. It's like they tried to hide how bloated her face looked by making the ugliest episode they could. When I try to recall that episode, my mind instead conjures memories of the first time I played Dead Money, on low settings and a dim monitor.

9
SturmMilfEnthusiast 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Republican supermajority"; 72-25

"progressive-leaning"; 36-0

Yeah don't mind me, just having one of those impulses where you want to put somebody through the fucking wall.

6
SturmMilfEnthusiast 6 points ago +6 / -0

When this shit started a few years ago, most leftists didn't (and still don't) know who the fuck she was. The schizo part of my brain, which has been correct far too often this last decade, thinks her introduction into leftist peon circles was a social weapons test. Leftists aren't all that historically-minded outside of whatever has the most immediate utility to them, and Thatcher does not have that much utility to them as a historical figure.

What it actually looks like is how they react to (who they believe are) present-day symbols of the right. Their vitriol towards her takes the same form as it does for anyone from JBP to Tucker to Trump, as if they're currently fighting her. I don't think they would have that reaction naturally, since Thatcher is not alive and therefore can't hurt them by being defiant, but with the right signals in the right circles, you could artificially induce it.

The leftist peons' need to signal their loyalty to the cause, and addiction to being the cruel master with an excuse, are their driving forces. Leftist rulers already use that to control their peons on the large scale, it's just a matter of getting the right signals in the right place to induce hatred against a specific target. A dead target can't fight back, making it a great control for an experiment.

If it was a test, it worked, because this started happening right when leftists evolved in how quickly they could coordinate against targets. They could target, attack, and move on to a new target twice a day, in lockstep. All it ever took was the right post on social media, artificially boosted at the right time, with just the right keywords to trigger them. And of course, they've started getting sloppier recently, and it happens to be that Twitter's Trending tab is no longer as heavily curated or editorialized.

As an aside, it's similar to how their attitude on the Civil War has shifted. What was once historical utility (claiming the sole right to define the purpose of the war) is now framed as a present-day conflict ("Sherman was right and there's no quarter for traitors"). That, at least, could have happened naturally, simply because their hatred of belligerent white southerners has never ended, but the setup and outcome is so similar to a much more artificial instance of it happening that I can't quite rule out that it was largely externally influenced.

5
SturmMilfEnthusiast 5 points ago +5 / -0

Land acknowledgements are where powerful, untouchable people declare that white peasants have no right to live on the land on which they were born, in the nations that their ancestors built. Instead, it's a crime, carrying with it all the unspoken implications of that crime. Simply put, they want to delegitimize white people's existence.

0
SturmMilfEnthusiast 0 points ago +1 / -1

If "prove it" is now an ad hominem, and that makes me a vapid moron, then I guess I'll just be irreemably retarded and you can have your schizo episode unopposed.

0
SturmMilfEnthusiast 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're gonna need a second decently-sized spergeout to prove that one, and while you're at it, a third to come up with a loophole for why it's still sex if you last longer than 10 seconds.

0
SturmMilfEnthusiast 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's not like he actually believes being a two-pump chump is the only way to have sex. He's just chasing the hot take make number go up effect that all social media addicts chase, and you can't get away from, even here.

0
SturmMilfEnthusiast 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't know what's gayer, reaching this hard for the weakest word-game own possible, or collectively masturbating about how "clever" it is.

1
SturmMilfEnthusiast 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'd have to not just be trapped in their system, but trapped on their planet. If we could get things into space cheaply, in a billion years, there wouldn't be a spot in the galaxy that a species could discover the radio and not also proof of extraterrestrial life (us). We wouldn't even need lunar colonies to do it either, let alone extrasolar ones.

I think the best argument so far is that we're just early. Supposedly, Earth is one of the earliest of the terrestrial planets to form in a habitable zone. If only a tenth of all of our type of planet produces intelligent life, we could be the very first in the galaxy. That means the only evidence of alien life would have had to cross an intergalactic void, which is a much higher hurdle.

8
SturmMilfEnthusiast 8 points ago +8 / -0

The libs trying to cancel Putin is one of the funniest things to come out of the war.

1
SturmMilfEnthusiast 1 point ago +1 / -0

The site may be ran by freaks, but front page animal posts are the domain of normies. Did you ever check before you started foaming at the mouth? I invite you to go stalk the profile of that demon worshipping pedophile and tell me just what unimaginable evils you find.

1
SturmMilfEnthusiast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ultimately it wasn't banned for being racist or anti-male, but anti transvestite, which says everything that needs to be said about Reddit...

That's how Rowling ended up on the shitlist in the first place, funnily enough. Her original "transphobic comments" basically boiled down to "Transwomen can't share our space because transwomen are men, and men are bad."

3
SturmMilfEnthusiast 3 points ago +3 / -0

A man so mentally broken he can be reverse-Kirked by his fucking smartphone. Good lord.

11
SturmMilfEnthusiast 11 points ago +11 / -0

LGBdroptheT and RightWingGays (or something like that) were fairly active subs before Reddit nuked them for escaping their enclosures.

2
SturmMilfEnthusiast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well how else do you expect them to take part in the Trans Day of Vengeance?

5
SturmMilfEnthusiast 5 points ago +5 / -0

There was a time, back when they called themselves transvestites, where they didn't have the option of making those demands of people in the first place. They were basically treated like exceptionally odd crossdressers. That whole cognitive imperalism started with "gender dysphoria" entering common knowledge, and the associated idea that pronoun games were necessary to their health, which was during the transition from "transsexual" to "transgender." We're now a couple stages past that.

You could write an entire book just outlining the history and taxonomy of tranny shit. Somebody probably should. I don't know that anyone, anywhere, has properly documented how gender dysphoria silently slipped back out of trans ideology, and that's probably the most important thing that's happened since it originally entered the ideology.

11
SturmMilfEnthusiast 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't think it's "worship" so much as it is ownership. Feminism basically induced androphobia in entire generations of women, so women's relationship with masculinity is all sorts of scuffed. The gay best friend allows a woman to have a "pet" man without any of the masculinity she's so afraid of, and the flaming homo gets to induldge in being a stereotype drama queen, which naturally feeds back into women's impulse towards cattiness. The drag queen phenomenon is just that, on crack.

8
SturmMilfEnthusiast 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fine whatever you say. Any spics who side against whitey (while benefitting from his works) are obviously doing it because they're too stupid and useless not to be puppeted by el diablo blanco.

8
SturmMilfEnthusiast 8 points ago +9 / -1

The whole "it's always the gringos" thing is a giant fucking cope. There are more than enough religiously liberal latinos (mostly latinas, really) that buy into that shit, because aligning with libs gives them power.

All "based minority" narratives are rooted in the same anti-white beliefs that libs hold. Sorry beaners and niggers, your people are just as capable of feeding the collapse of liberalism as the white devil. It's not actually all our fault.

1
SturmMilfEnthusiast 1 point ago +2 / -1

I could tell something was up with that manga just from the audience it seemed to draw.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›