Musk Refuses to Pay Rent for Twitter building due to City Conditions
(www.breitbart.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
This is actually a fascinating strategy. Locating your HQ in cities that desperately need to hold onto businesses while refusing rent until they improve.
I genuinely don't know how this will turn out, although he has some balls on him to try this. One of the more aggressive ways to fuck with a Dem city I have seen so far.
I'm a bit perplexed by this. Shouldn't the statement be made by not paying local taxes? Unless the landlord is also affiliated with the cities/states, it seems to me like they would be screwing an unaffiliated third party.
If they've been renting land to Twitter to operate, they're not unafilliated. For years, Twitter was a propaganda platform against whites, men, Christians, and civil society in general. I don't know precisely where the line between collaborator and citizen is drawn, but I'm certain whoever owns those lands and buildings gets to share in the blame.