That's a good point. Perhaps this was the first time they decided to show the real results, after having fixed the results on so many previous occasions since the Blair administration opened up the floodgates of 'diversity & inclusion'.
I know exactly what they'll do, it's the same thing that Hollywood now does and anyone in these industries who dares to have mass wrong think. They'll claim that they're just racist anonymous online trolls and should be banned.
The freaks may even go so far as to start doxxing people who use their phone numbers to text and go and stalk them to try and shame them over migration and put them on blast for the public to see. This is what I've been preaching about for months when it comes to the sanitations of the internet by corporations. Seriously I would advise using burner phones on these data farming operations just in case and give a fake name.
It's what happens when a bunch of middle class women and boomers gain access to peoples' real opinions and aren't ready for it so they're going to band together to attack people in earnest. Hate speech laws are a part of that, but pretty soon they're going to expand this big time. Misogyny for example the feminists have been pushing for years and it's basically any time a woman gets called out for being a massive slut online or even vaguely criticised that isn't simping that will be classed as misogyny.
I don't know enough about who they're polling to know for sure, but I suspect if you polled Brits randomly, you'd probably end up at least at something like a 1:5 ratio minimum, not 1:20. If only 5% of the population was on their side, they'd have to step up their game from disenfranchisement to outright disappearances. 20% is probably just enough to control a liberal democracy through mostly non-violent, mostly-institutional means, as long as you keep them politically active, like by making them fear their holy mission might fail.
News media and its offshoots aren't usually engaging with dissidents directly. The MSM is there to control the idiot masses through false consensus, and distribute the political orthodoxy to its followers. Through that lens, it makes sense for BBC to try to scare people by presenting a widespread "threat" to the orthodoxy.
This is why the public was never asked about the genocidal immigration policies
Diversity + proximity = war.
Always.
Multiculturalism is just multiple personality disorder on a statewide scale. You can't have multiple souls in the same body without mass conflict.
... of course it's working!
I mean, it's not making any aspect of life better for the people who lived there already, but I'm pretty certain that wasn't ever the intention.
clearly we just need to do it harder
It’s working exactly as intended.
I don't know why, yet, but I can tell you the BBC definitely knew that result would come up.
They can easily fix these things if they'd want to.
That's a good point. Perhaps this was the first time they decided to show the real results, after having fixed the results on so many previous occasions since the Blair administration opened up the floodgates of 'diversity & inclusion'.
I know exactly what they'll do, it's the same thing that Hollywood now does and anyone in these industries who dares to have mass wrong think. They'll claim that they're just racist anonymous online trolls and should be banned.
The freaks may even go so far as to start doxxing people who use their phone numbers to text and go and stalk them to try and shame them over migration and put them on blast for the public to see. This is what I've been preaching about for months when it comes to the sanitations of the internet by corporations. Seriously I would advise using burner phones on these data farming operations just in case and give a fake name.
It's what happens when a bunch of middle class women and boomers gain access to peoples' real opinions and aren't ready for it so they're going to band together to attack people in earnest. Hate speech laws are a part of that, but pretty soon they're going to expand this big time. Misogyny for example the feminists have been pushing for years and it's basically any time a woman gets called out for being a massive slut online or even vaguely criticised that isn't simping that will be classed as misogyny.
It's coming and this is how they'll justify it.
"This is why we have to do so much more!"
I don't know enough about who they're polling to know for sure, but I suspect if you polled Brits randomly, you'd probably end up at least at something like a 1:5 ratio minimum, not 1:20. If only 5% of the population was on their side, they'd have to step up their game from disenfranchisement to outright disappearances. 20% is probably just enough to control a liberal democracy through mostly non-violent, mostly-institutional means, as long as you keep them politically active, like by making them fear their holy mission might fail.
News media and its offshoots aren't usually engaging with dissidents directly. The MSM is there to control the idiot masses through false consensus, and distribute the political orthodoxy to its followers. Through that lens, it makes sense for BBC to try to scare people by presenting a widespread "threat" to the orthodoxy.