But we had plenty of "Girlboss" and "Gaslight" so more of one is a solution to the other two.
Pretty sure there is a "Gatekeep" component to that as well.
That is right up there with "hate memes" as a leading cause of unlife in the trans community.
In a race to the bottom, why be better? The currency of victimhood gains value the "worse off" you are, so actually sorting their depression would make them "less wealthy" in social standing.
With no outside pressure and no inside drive to change, they sit and fester, often to praise and rewards in the form of handouts.
If we stop subsidizing their lifestyle of misery, they would have to change.
Your doubt is well founded, but assumes that words have meaning. In a society where 'literally' means 'figuratively' (with institutional backing), and opponents who engage in college debate level word twisting and teasing, permanent means whatever they want it to mean. Unless you can gather enough support/power to pin them down and agree on a definition, then show that agreement to the world, then bludgeon them with their own stupidity until they concede, there is no permanent but their permanent.
I'm not saying free helicopter rides may be needed to defend language against these bozos, but free helicopter rides.
A picture really is worth a thousand words.
Do you not understand, citizen? The scarf of "the people's doctor" is a precious artifact of the people to be preserved for the people as a symbol of the people as a reminder of the people's triumph!
A beacon of hope to women, women doctors, and the other stunning and brave people whom were not directly mentioned!
Gaze upon the brown stripes and green zigzags, both of which she consciously chose to wear as they are, and have always been, symbols of the people!
That headline seems a bit half baked. Please, allow me.
"Progressive Cultists Are Loving That Blapril O'Negro Is Making The Right People Angry"
Season with clap, fire and 100% emojis to taste. Best plated in small portions on social media. Pairs well with presumed oppression or assumed bigotry.
As the Democrats are currently "in charge" of the US government at this time, it makes sense that requests would be made to keep a bad situation from becoming worse, though I have a feeling that Republicans would do the same if they were in power.
I am sure both sides have financial backers crawling out of the walls to make sure they do whatever can be done to keep the banks safe from their own foolish decisions.
Your checkbox list is missing "non-christian" and "disabled" though her picture seems to imply both.
Take a look at the author of that panel and find your answer.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Grace_Freud
Not too long though. You may not be able to unsee what you have seen.
Why though? A womanless birth could likely be achieved and would be beneficial as an alternative for those who cannot conceive by normal means, but doing it to hurt women and strip them of their unique value is almost pointlessly cruel. It would also taint the technology to be used in such a spiteful and petty manner.
No worries! It is hard enough to be understood in person, let alone through the internet by text.
Well, is it possible to earn/deserve a birthright? Please allow me to ramble as I try to explain. TLDR at the bottom
If my parents are short, and I grow up to be tall while all my siblings are short, is my height undeserved or unearned? It's certainly unusual, and likely an advantage, though not fair to my brothers and sisters as I should have been short, just like them. My birthright is shortness, yet I received something with considerably more potential. As it is a blessing, I would hope that I am humble and gracious in regards to my height.
A girl is born with all she needs to become pregnant and sustain a newborn once she reaches a certain age, barring injury or tragedy or birth defect. Bearing children is her birthright, something only she and other women can do, something unique and essential to the survival of the human race. This gives our hypothetical girl an inherent value. As the value is inherent, it cannot be earned, though her actions outside of being able to give birth would argue for or against how deserving she is of this priviledge. One would hope that she recognizes this unique value and use it to her advantage in a way that does not lessen how deserving she is of this birthright.
This also ties in to the keeper of sex aspect, which is based on the above inherent value. Pregnancy and birth are difficult and expensive, with the potential for permanent injury including death. It makes perfect sense to be selective about sexual partners, but the societal trend seems to be "All the dicks I can manage, but none of the consequences when it eventually goes wrong." Because birth control and abortion are more readily available, there is less reason to be selective with sexual partners. As single mothers are no longer shamed and can, in part, depend on the state to take care of them through various means, there is even less selection pressure.
To me, the inherent value of women, the birthright of child bearing, has been cheapened by our society and by the actions of women who engage in reckless sexual pursuits, which also weakens their role as keepers of sex and makes them less deserving.
There is a male component to this, but this post is already long enough to merit a TLDR, so I'm not interested in sorting that today.
TLDR: Women have inherent value by birthright, but are diminishing that value by not recognizing the value of that value.
Though unrealistic, their demand for "instant accommodation and respect with no effort" falls in line with the general western societal experience of a woman, correct?
A girl eventually becomes a woman, and women are essential for the next generation as they are the baby makers and the keepers of sex. A man, if he wants a woman, must demonstrate his value. A woman, and I apologize for being incredibly reductive here as I do not want to wall of text everyone, must not die or be completely undesirable if she wants a man.
It is no mystery that some women feel entitled to success without effort; it's been their entire life.
You're welcome, and thank you.
I doubt there was much thinking. The social conditioning kicked in before a thought could even form.
So close, but still problematic drawing due to lack of inclusivity: Both characters have thin privilege. Both are white coded. Both pass to such a degree that it is essentially trans erasure, which we all know is much worse than trans exclusion!
Be (clap) a better (clap) ally, (clap) artist!
Rumor has that Disney may be waking up to the fact that Star Wars has been spoiled, so they are slashing content. Karyn is not the only producer whom has been affected by this decision, but she seems to be the first to complain to the manager about it.
Do not ask at whom the trans ally whinges, xey whinge at thee.
Though fitting, red is a bit bold for your average Truck-kun. White is more traditional, mundane and less eye catching, all leading to a greater isekai success rate.
How dense is your audience that you need to label the elephant head Drake as a Republican? Context clues in the wall of text not obvious enough? And why the hell is the label right aligned instead of center? Is that also part of the humor or is the creator inept in garbage tier meme generation?
Counter offer: Canada, go to Hell. Warmer temperatures and similar standard of living. I have heard that MAID service guarantees entry, no passport needed.
"ESG executive investigated ESG system and found ESG to be better at everything than less ESG compliant systems."
Snark out of the way, it is difficult to believe people who say their system is better when they hide their methods and data behind a curtain. Show us your numbers! They may not lie, but you surely would, especially as the Head of U.S. ESG Strategy at the Bank of America. ESG cheerleading, for all intents and purposes, is the point of that position.
It might work. The Pied Piper was able to charm rats and children, so overgrown children who act like animals should not be that hard.