28
Sneak_King 28 points ago +28 / -0

This is a fantastic example of frame control and always attacking. Libs aren't even acknowledging the "immigrants are welcome" hypocrisy. Instead, their first response is to fabricate new ground to attack DeSantis from. Take notes.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +8 / -3

What part of "...for thee, not for me" do you not understand?

3
Sneak_King 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn, I was hoping this was going to be a thread on tax evasion tips and tricks.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

"No one is in charge" can't be repeated enough.

For one, they can't be good stewards, because they are children of Satan the Devil. But even good stewards couldn't right this ship. That work would have needed to start in the 1960s, the moment it was clear the generation after the boomers wasn't as numerous. And it would have involved fractal self-sufficiency, to prepare for an eventual shrinking of...everything. That didn't happen.

1
Sneak_King 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say all that and I still affirm what I did say.

Paul says to pray for all, but also warns to beware of ex-companions who are spreading bad teachings (almost literally says "don't have anything to do with [Greek name], he has been nothing but trouble." Maybe in Timothy, I don't recall off the top of my head).

Titus has a verse about removing "self-condemned" people (those who persist in evil despite warnings) completely from your life.

How do you "save with fear" without, you know, inducing fear?

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

Christ didn't tell us to not judge, He told us to be prepared to be judged by the standard that we use. It's more a caution against religion than morality (so-and-so doesn't tithe enough, they're going to hell!).

There's also plenty of scriptural support for hating evil. Right now, I particularly like this bit from Jude:

22 And on some have compassion, making a distinction; 23 but others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh.

10
Sneak_King 10 points ago +10 / -0

I generally think "AI" is a meme, and an artificial one at that, but widespread use like this would be hilarious.

4
Sneak_King 4 points ago +4 / -0

What do you mean by "generational warfare"? Old vs. young? Tightening the screws on this generation to make it that much harder for the next?

by folx
1
Sneak_King 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bullying works, folks.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

Given how he handled the Challenger report, I think he would've done us proud.

8
Sneak_King 8 points ago +8 / -0

Read Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman. It's an extremely easy read. A sampling:

• Feynman gives a commencement speech at a SA university where he tells everyone, students and faculty, they're retarded, except the one guy who turns out to be a German exchange student.

• A PUA acquaintance tells him how to get women. He tries it and it works. Feynman concludes the guy is probably right, but it feels unsporting, so Feynman never tries it again.

• He tries to put forth the 'critical thinking' meme, but most of his math stories are about how memorizing way too much ended up saving the day.

• He was such a good lockbreaker at Los Alamos that engineers would ask him to open file cabinets of people who were away rather than wait for the owners to return. He would have to sit in an empty office for 20 minutes with the door closed doing nothing to make sure he didn't accidentally open the locks too quickly.

20
Sneak_King 20 points ago +20 / -0

You can't...you can't just fly a drone at a random vector relative to your actors. Jackson used sweeping helicopter shots in the same direction to communicate traversal. The fact that the camera is high up is the least important part of 'muh vistas' shots.

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd be very curious to rewatch Slither and see how it holds up.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

As far as monarchies and empires go, England has a strong 'minarchist' history. The crown was practically a night watchman state through the whole age of sail.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ah, been a while since I've been called a faggot.

Thanks for organizing!

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

Has China not invented telescopic collapse yet or what?

10
Sneak_King 10 points ago +10 / -0

I know what you mean and don't understand how people get that way. Average house prices has gone up 5 fold in the last 20 years. If that's purely due to inflation (and there's probably some immigration population increase at play), the dollar has lost 80 percent of its buying power in less than a generation.

This has been going on for a hundred years and, as long as you buy anything, can't possibly be missed. How is anyone not mad all the time?

9
Sneak_King 9 points ago +9 / -0

Separate reply for a different topic:

I feel like there's a lot of (((noticing))) that happens here. Do people really get banned for talking about kikes?

I can see them getting banned for "race war now" type stuff under the retarded "no violence" rule, but I thought JQ stuff is usually decently received.

I've used all the main buzzwords, we'll see what happens to this post.

Alternatively, if you have more extreme opinions than that, I would love to hear them. Does this site have DMs?

7
Sneak_King 7 points ago +9 / -2

I want to believe what you're saying is true for larger society, but I don't think it is for my circle. The absolute tamest topic you can be truthful about is that women and men are different. I've had conversations where people nod along re: trannies, wage gap, and upper body strength, but then pull the ejector if you go one step further and suggest that women are morally inferior to men and women should be Biblically subservient to their husbands (not even going full anti-19th).

The liberal assumption of equality is so deeply ingrained, they can't fathom giving it up, even though they agree it's completely unfounded socially, intellectually, and physically.

25
Sneak_King 25 points ago +25 / -0

For me, it's less about covid and more about neoliberalism in general. Every person I know is a neoliberal. Obviously, my deep blue co-workers. But my republican parents: neolibs. My pastor with the marksmanship hobby: neolib. My homesteading friends: neolibs.

They all "know something is wrong" but can't even imagine considering that it could be the assumptions of equality, corporate-run government, non-violent society, and consumer lifestyle (let alone ethnic groups that are over-represented in pushing same).

I only have so many ways to tell them that a 'solution' that changes not one thing isn't a solution.

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

That gives me plenty to look into. Thanks!

3
Sneak_King 3 points ago +3 / -0

What are the good MW5 mods?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›