Of course violence against government is all fine and dandy when its BLM and AntiFA and AGAINST THE GOP.
Nancy Pelosi kneeled and swore an oath of fealty to BLM after their violence.
Why do they suddenly think that it's now bad? (it's a rhetorical question, I know why)
Oh - I’ve suspected it as soon as they announced a nationwide lockdown which has NEVER been an attempt to stop a viral spread in any history book or even a contingency/preparedness plan except as maybe a last ditch effort.
There’s also the part of going along with your society - we’re not communists or sheep but we are an organized body of people that have to work together and we don’t have all the information that the leadership has (and that’s another red flag - but that’s also typical of all crises in the short term - but this constant squelching and in some cases flagrant and violent censorship of counter info is frightening in a supposed free society)
So yeah - I’ve been calling BS the whole time but the truth is readily becoming apparent and verifiable.
I really want to believe that the “vaccines” are at least as somewhat effective as they state and that they're following SOME semblance of science - (no, I'm not vaxxed)
But stories like this only seem to lead to the conclusion that our leadership AND scientists are nothing more than morons at best and this is a global attempt to enforce totalitarian control at worst.
My state is now showing that 1/3 of the population has tested positive and about 2/3 are vaccinated and yet rates of infection are at an all time high (and includes my anecdotal evidence - last year this time I knew of 2 families that had it. This year its 8 and they've all been vaxxed (except the youngest children) (including my leftist twit families that refused to go anywhere or see family last year but this year are all out and about because they've been vaxxed... yeah, they got it... but it wasn't bad so it was good they were vaxxed!) So what's that mean?
Well.. to quote Sherlock Holmes... "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"
Not true.
If it was actually effective - I'd take it.
It it was perfectly harmless and kind of effective I'd probably take it rather than risk my entire livelihood like I'm about to do.
But it's not effective. It's not harmless. And I'm increasingly mortified that they're now calling for a 4th and FIFTH booster shot and we've barely been giving them for a YEAR - so we're basically now down to 2.5 months efficacy? That's BS and that includes the ONE MONTH for the shot to become fully effective.
All of this points to a leadership that has no idea of what they're doing but merely wants to enforce a civilian passport system where we need a license to work, eat and travel.
Again, I say, BS!
The Spanish Flu of 1918 ended WITHOUT A VACCINE in 18 months. We're now in the 21st month.
No one really knows what the actual issue is.
https://www.glamour.com/story/why-isnt-kim-cattrall-in-the-sex-and-the-city-revival
It took months for the first reports to come out about myocarditis from the J&J shot and several more for the mRNA variants. It'll take time to determine if it's safe or has other issues. Also there's fewer people taking it so that increases the time for side effects to show up.