Good argument, I wish we would go back to when it was the legislature of the state that selected senators but without the issues that they had before it became a public election process.
If you combine that with a state level Electoral College system we would have a totally different country at this point.
I'm sure that there is a good answer to this question but in terms of legal difficulty wouldn't it be just as troublesome for them to instead form their own state? They are talking about a huge swath of territory anyway.
BTW, I believe there is a better solution to all of this. Bring the Electoral College system to the state level. That will stop the blue egalitarian collectivist types from destroying the rest of the state and they will still have the economic power of scales of economy for being a city center.
Good points, this is exactly the problem I have. I want the wholesale destruction of the federal government. It is not salvageable and it is doing staggering damage to the American people. Anyone who thinks it is salvageable, is delusional in my view. So we either need a total dollar collapse or we need a massive wrecking ball on the inside.
I don't know if Ramaswamy is real or not and I definitely appreciate those who don't trust him, I'm still on the fence about that. But lets assume that he is for real and he means what he says. In that case I think he is the better bet than Trump. Not that it is going to make a difference because unless Trump is knocked out of running, he is going to take the primary.
I'd still like to see room made for both RFK Jr and Ramaswamy because if both mean what they say, the trifecta combination between the three men over twelve years should spell a real sea change in this government.
And if I can't have that, well it sure looks like we are still on course for a dollar collapse because no one in government is capable of doing math and geopolitics at the same time.
Thanks for the replies all. I appreciate and largely concur with the sentiments expressed. Unfortunately it appears that since not a single person pushed back on the COVID assumption, that there is a de facto consensus that Trump will provide no help there.
On the point of Trump being a weapon against the establishment, I very much want this to be true but I have to confess that I am not very optimistic about it. :-/ Anyway this assumes that he even gets to take the seat again...
Peace
I agree but I believe that is a separate issue and is likely going to have to be handled by congress (reminder to all constituents that it is YOUR DUTY to apply pressure on congress members...). And just so we're clear, I see that as a criminal issue on the part of the federal government actors. They are in a very clear willful violation of the founding principles and law of the country.
My position is that big tech platforms are a de facto public space. That is how they offered themselves at the start, that is how the public came to them and that it how they are being used. For these platforms to then act as a willfully biased curator is simply not acceptable.
They can't have their cake and eat it to. They either must be forced to serve the public in the manner which they offered their service or they can be made to be accountable for their curation.
This judge is a useful idiot.
I honestly don't know as there are definitely people in the world who need to be kept away from other people. If we don't have police to tackle the front end of that problem then by necessity we must end up with a posse, yes?
All I want to know is why nobody ever points out who exactly is driving the immigration policy. If the German people can't even say that much then they are straight up slaves. This isn't complicated.
Name names.