All I want to know is why nobody ever points out who exactly is driving the immigration policy. If the German people can't even say that much then they are straight up slaves. This isn't complicated.
Alas, the last time Germans grew so bold as to rattle their cage, the fathers & grandfathers of the architects of today's immigration policy summoned most of the world to bomb and rape them into submission, tear Germany itself in half, and put their kids in the custody of pedophiles with the full expectation that they would have any 'fascistic tendencies' raped out of them as early as possible for decades on end, so as to make absolutely sure the lesson they wished to teach sank in that time.
I've long thought that if possible I would treat Hitler like Ebenezer Scrooge* and show him what his actions ultimately did to the German people and the larger world. If he truly only had good intentions but badly miscalculated, I think he would end himself on the spot.
I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
Sorry but I can't agree with the low birth rate argument, it is completely bogus in my view. Populations respond to what is going on around them and they will reach a population equilibrium due to those dynamics. If people aren't having families you don't import a completely incompatible people, you instead fix what was broken and I would argue that the things that were broken was done on purpose.
If we didn't have to compete with mass immigration for all houses and jobs (and the lowered pay of them because of their willingness to work for slave wages), most people would be financially secure enough to have more kids and likely put us much closer to the replacement rate.
You are repeating their narrative of selling the solution to a problem that is partially created by that solution in the first place.
All governments around the world need immigration due to the low birth rate.
How about they address the causes of the lower birth rate instead of turning their own countries into third world shitholes? They'll get more people, but fundamentally change entire countries in the process.
All I want to know is why nobody ever points out who exactly is driving the immigration policy. If the German people can't even say that much then they are straight up slaves. This isn't complicated.
Name names.
Oy vey! Names are racist and anti-semitic!
Alas, the last time Germans grew so bold as to rattle their cage, the fathers & grandfathers of the architects of today's immigration policy summoned most of the world to bomb and rape them into submission, tear Germany itself in half, and put their kids in the custody of pedophiles with the full expectation that they would have any 'fascistic tendencies' raped out of them as early as possible for decades on end, so as to make absolutely sure the lesson they wished to teach sank in that time.
I've long thought that if possible I would treat Hitler like Ebenezer Scrooge* and show him what his actions ultimately did to the German people and the larger world. If he truly only had good intentions but badly miscalculated, I think he would end himself on the spot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebenezer_Scrooge
I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
Sorry but I can't agree with the low birth rate argument, it is completely bogus in my view. Populations respond to what is going on around them and they will reach a population equilibrium due to those dynamics. If people aren't having families you don't import a completely incompatible people, you instead fix what was broken and I would argue that the things that were broken was done on purpose.
If we didn't have to compete with mass immigration for all houses and jobs (and the lowered pay of them because of their willingness to work for slave wages), most people would be financially secure enough to have more kids and likely put us much closer to the replacement rate.
You are repeating their narrative of selling the solution to a problem that is partially created by that solution in the first place.
How about they address the causes of the lower birth rate instead of turning their own countries into third world shitholes? They'll get more people, but fundamentally change entire countries in the process.