I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
While you're not inherently wrong, you're forgetting the huge fact that it was Britain, France, Poland, and bankers that wanted to instigate a war against Germany after Hitler took power. There was a secret agreement with Poland to antagonize Germany into a war, and regardless of who started it, Britain and France would ally with Poland against Germany. This is why Briain and France declared war against Germany for invading Poland, but not against Soviet Russia for doing the same thing, just a few weeks later. Furthermore, just like during WW1, every peace envoy Germany sent to negotiate peace, was denied, or imprisoned.
Sure. Blame it on the people who made preparations to deal with Germany if they started a SECOND world war. That makes sense. Let's ignore everything Germany did and claim the people who were invaded were the ones who were at fault. Because you for some reason believe that a socialist dictator who ruined his nation wasn't a massive faggot.
You've been lied to about everything. Stop blindly accepting the history you were taught. It was either an outright lie or, at best, carefully curated half truths to distort reality, to push a false narrative and conclusion (i.e. propaganda and brainwashing).
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
German-Soviet cooperation predated Hitler by quite some time, the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo between the early Weimar gov't and Lenin had already established extensive economic & military ties between the two for a decade before the Nazis' rise (with the Germans getting to build various secret training academies & factories/testing sites on Soviet soil to circumvent the Versailles demilitarization terms). As for Molotov-Ribbentrop, that was just a case of Hitler exploiting the Entente/Allies' fecklessness & duplicity: the Soviets were the most militantly pro-Czechoslovak great power in the lead-up to Munich, but obviously their hopes for any anti-Nazi coalition (one they wanted because they weren't blind and deaf either, Mein Kampf was a published work and not some top-secret document that no Soviet spy could have possibly read) were frustrated by the Western Allies dropping Czechoslovakia like a hot potato and Poland jumping in to annex the Zaolzie region. Of course Stalin would've decided that if the Western Allies were willing to throw a fellow democracy with good relationships under the bus, he'd have better luck trying to find a better deal with Hitler, and Hitler meanwhile understood that short-term cooperation against a common enemy in Poland beats risking pushing the Soviets back onto a pro-Allied course early on.
Recall that it wasn't until after Munich that Stalin replaced his pro-Allied and anti-German Soviet foreign minister, Maxim Litvinov, with Molotov. Poland could hardly present itself (despite the best efforts of Allied propagandists) like some innocent lamb after grabbing Zaolzie under much the same rationale as Hitler used for the Sudetenland and its own efforts to restrict & suppress Ukrainians (suffice to say that while it was disproportionate, it wasn't like there was no reason whatsoever for the Ukrainians' own extremely brutal massacres of Poles in Galicia-Volhynia during WW2). Hitler merely exploited an opening created by the retardation, weakness and greed of his enemies, and neither he nor Stalin (who would've attacked Germany if Hitler hadn't attacked him first) were under any delusion that theirs was a lasting agreement which should have long outlived the elimination of their most obvious mutual enemy; the funny mustache man's big crime here was failing to crush the Soviets with his backstab.
I didn't downvote you but I do have to disagree. I think at most he (and, frankly, any other genuine German nationalist from that time period put into his position) might have done some things differently, but the Treaty of Versailles and the absolute pile of shit Germany had to eat in the interwar years made some dramatic and - to put it mildly - controversial moves necessary to break out of the rut it was in: Weimar Germany was very much stuck between multiple rocks and hard places. Not doing anything or continuing to try to play the rigged game the globalists had put together through the League of Nations and their various Entente sockpuppets would only have guaranteed that they'd remain in their hopelessly demilitarized & demoralized state, complete with wheelbarrows of useless cash and child hookers on every street, and thereby a slower and more drawn-out death for Germany (rather like what's going on now actually).
Hitler was doing great on rebuilding the social fabric of the German people, it was his militancy that went radically overboard. Had he just stuck with the former, we would have a completely different history behind us. :-/
While you're not inherently wrong, you're forgetting the huge fact that it was Britain, France, Poland, and bankers that wanted to instigate a war against Germany after Hitler took power. There was a secret agreement with Poland to antagonize Germany into a war, and regardless of who started it, Britain and France would ally with Poland against Germany. This is why Briain and France declared war against Germany for invading Poland, but not against Soviet Russia for doing the same thing, just a few weeks later. Furthermore, just like during WW1, every peace envoy Germany sent to negotiate peace, was denied, or imprisoned.
Sure. Blame it on the people who made preparations to deal with Germany if they started a SECOND world war. That makes sense. Let's ignore everything Germany did and claim the people who were invaded were the ones who were at fault. Because you for some reason believe that a socialist dictator who ruined his nation wasn't a massive faggot.
You've been lied to about everything. Stop blindly accepting the history you were taught. It was either an outright lie or, at best, carefully curated half truths to distort reality, to push a false narrative and conclusion (i.e. propaganda and brainwashing).
You should read these:
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/NHC/NewPDFs/GERMANY/GER.Polish.Atrocities.Against.German.Minority.in.Poland.1940.pdf
Pre-ww2 Germany was recovering after the nazis ended the weimar. Then Hitler decided to shake hands with Stalin and join his ideological cousin in picking a fight. Because deranged leftists always prioritize personal power over the prosperity of their nation or lives of their people.
Hitler was a faggot, and his stupidity destroyed Germany forever.
German-Soviet cooperation predated Hitler by quite some time, the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo between the early Weimar gov't and Lenin had already established extensive economic & military ties between the two for a decade before the Nazis' rise (with the Germans getting to build various secret training academies & factories/testing sites on Soviet soil to circumvent the Versailles demilitarization terms). As for Molotov-Ribbentrop, that was just a case of Hitler exploiting the Entente/Allies' fecklessness & duplicity: the Soviets were the most militantly pro-Czechoslovak great power in the lead-up to Munich, but obviously their hopes for any anti-Nazi coalition (one they wanted because they weren't blind and deaf either, Mein Kampf was a published work and not some top-secret document that no Soviet spy could have possibly read) were frustrated by the Western Allies dropping Czechoslovakia like a hot potato and Poland jumping in to annex the Zaolzie region. Of course Stalin would've decided that if the Western Allies were willing to throw a fellow democracy with good relationships under the bus, he'd have better luck trying to find a better deal with Hitler, and Hitler meanwhile understood that short-term cooperation against a common enemy in Poland beats risking pushing the Soviets back onto a pro-Allied course early on.
Recall that it wasn't until after Munich that Stalin replaced his pro-Allied and anti-German Soviet foreign minister, Maxim Litvinov, with Molotov. Poland could hardly present itself (despite the best efforts of Allied propagandists) like some innocent lamb after grabbing Zaolzie under much the same rationale as Hitler used for the Sudetenland and its own efforts to restrict & suppress Ukrainians (suffice to say that while it was disproportionate, it wasn't like there was no reason whatsoever for the Ukrainians' own extremely brutal massacres of Poles in Galicia-Volhynia during WW2). Hitler merely exploited an opening created by the retardation, weakness and greed of his enemies, and neither he nor Stalin (who would've attacked Germany if Hitler hadn't attacked him first) were under any delusion that theirs was a lasting agreement which should have long outlived the elimination of their most obvious mutual enemy; the funny mustache man's big crime here was failing to crush the Soviets with his backstab.