I think the same types pushing "cis" already tried to stigmatize "normal" for years. I remember getting the impression from most mass media growing up that being normal was boring. It was uncool, not worth being proud of, square. There was always a subtle push to be different. Almost like a concerted effort to fling open the floodgates to multiculturalism and sexual degeneracy.
And to some extent, it did work.
But it didn't work well enough, since at the end of the day, most people simply are normal. They may bristle at having their natural state of being compared to negative things, but they are normal, and it's extremely difficult to get someone to feel ashamed about something genuine good. Something normal.
Slapping the cis label on the default state of being adds a layer of separation though. It's not just the default normal state anymore. It's just another identity in a sea of other nonsense identities. It's easier to stigmatize thanks to wordplay. And it seems to be working on a lot of idiot kids these days.
Reject cis, embrace normal.
The faggots that think it’s a word that should exist at all use it like a slur.
The rest of us don’t even use it.
Redundancy in law starts to occur when existing laws aren't being properly enforced. And they aren't being properly enforced in Canada.
In fact, proper justice is actively being blocked with bail reform legislation that allows criminals back on the streets immediately to commit more crimes. Even handed justice is being stymied with tiered justice where minorities, like natives, get lighter sentences simply due to their race. Judges are required to take their ethnicity into account in sentencing, leading to overly short sentences for violent offenders that simply reoffend at the first opportunity.
Worse yet, hate speech and hate crime legislation impose harsher penalties on petty crimes (if they're crimes at all) further entrenching a tiered justice system that punishes the majority as the oppressor class and holds up the minority as the eternal victim class that needs endless empathy and protection.
Self defense laws might as well not exist at all, in Canada. The expectation to retreat in every instance, including in your own home, and the impossibly high bar of "appropriate force" makes legal self defense tantamount to "just lay down and die already." Criminals become the people we're told to feel sympathy for, and victims become the criminals.
Redundant laws won't work of course, since they simply won't be properly enforced either. Same as the old laws that didn't fit the new progressive paradigm. But the lack of enforcement is the reason people think new laws are required.
What's required is a change in culture. A change in the administrative class. A change in the political class. A change in the judicial class. It's all too infected with woke progressives, and for all their bluster over caring about the oppressed and the vulnerable, they absolutely don't care at all. And they care least of all about the most vulnerable. Unborn children. They celebrate their abortions as a fundamental right, so it's no surprise they don't wish to offer any extra legal protections for them.
Those extra legal protections are reserved for pregnant women that get called a slur or find themselves offended over some benign opinion. Lock those racist bigots up forever! And once they're in jail, let out all the other violent criminals, so they don't get influenced by any hateful bigotry.
Yeah, that's the way, Canada. Keep it up.
Well, their attempts to censor it have resulted in me watching it and sharing it with family and friends that I figured would benefit from hearing the message.
Good job, youtube. You've amplified the message with attempted censorship. I hope you choke on your failure.
Me and thousands of other Canadians want the CBC banned from Canada. Do that first, then we can talk about banning anything else.
This seems like an effort to push genuinely patriotic Canadians towards hating their own national anthem. The more they make us hate what our country's become, the less resistence they'll get to further destructive changes to it.
And I do. I hate this. I hate it as much as I hate the ridiculous "unceded land" disclaimers at the start of so many events and political gatherings.
Fuck you, commie scum. Suck my unceded cock.
I don't know if you've ever watched women's sports, but genuinely female athletes are often sexy as fuck.
Gymnasts? Hot. Pole vaulters? Super hot.
Men's sports are for genuine competition, and they're worth watching simply to see athletes reaching the pinacle of their sport. Women's sports, on the other hand, are for eye candy and entertainment.
Which is why nasty, disgusting trannies need to stay the fuck out. They fail at both eye candy and entertainment.
So, North Africa rejects afrocentrism? Nice. Good choice. When can we expect Europe and North America to follow suit?
I'm tired of ignoring the vast majority of our cultural output due to my disinclination to suck nigger cock. It's both fake and gay, and I'll be having none of it.
Actual white nationalists don't particularly like republicans. Mostly because republicans aren't interested in a white ethnostate. They just want a fully realized enforcement of constitutional rights. American rights. And those rights make maintaining an ethnostate difficult.
The vanishingly few crossovers must represent the majority though, right? Of course they must.
The reason is the gender care gap.
The jotnar still walk the earth.
The islamgeld must continue. The invaders must be satiated. For the good of us all.
Actually, islam has its own word for this. Jizyah. I had previously been operating under the delusion that the West wasn't muslim lands, but I guess I was wrong.
We've already paid it. Over and over. It's called foreign aid paid by western governments. Huge sums of tax payer funded transfers of wealth.
I want it all back.
Demon lives matter when they go back to hell.
Yes, all lives matter. And in an effort to reclaim pride for all those lives, we must reinstate national pride. World wide.
Anglo pride! German pride! American pride!
No other pride must come before the pride in your nation, so queer pride's gonna have to take a backseat this year. Sorry, faggots. You'll just have to join the rest of us in being proud of our nations, culture and heritage instead.
Maybe their death rate would be better in Africa.
At the absolute bare minimum, if it's your job to enforce the law, you should understand the foundational framework that those laws operate within. The constitution.
There's an amendment that says you do have a right to hate speech. The supreme court has upheld that right. Hate speech is a meaningless speech category as far as the law is concerned. You have freedom of speech, period, not just the freedom to say things that don't offend anyone.
I know you know all this, but it's baffling that the cop doesn't. He either needs to learn the content and spirit of the laws he's meant to enforce, or they need to find better cops to replace him.
Disgusting.
He’s trying to preach his ministry to a congregation of heathen faggots.
Who are the police to interfere with his religious freedoms?
That thing they aren't doing would be a good thing, in fact.
Indigenous to the dregs of the gene pool.
I didn't even know why the shirt might be offensive, so I looked around the comments. I find a collection of offended people cheering on the ever encroaching police state. Lovely.
I finally get to some comments by other confused people, and of course there's the standard "EDUCATE YOURSELF" refrain. Why not just explain the offense? Right wing people love to explain what they're pissed off about, even though the explanation is usually labelled offensive anyway. Why can't authoritarian lefties do the same? Why must I read their minds or sift through a ton of information to find the needle in a needle stack of things that offend them?
Looking at the actual explanation, it's possible the shirt is referring to the 97 deaths of Liverpool fans in a stadium collapse and stampede years ago, or it might just be a coincidence, since the points tally for the team was also 97. Still "not enough" to win.
More than likely, the guy wearing the shirt saw the coincidence, chuckled to himself at the dark humor and put it on a shirt. Poort taste, maybe, but still comedy. If there hadn't been a dual explanation, it would've been just dark and tasteless, but that's not the case.
Vague laws about offensive content are ridiculously dumb, in any case.
Probably true. Society depends on women because they're desired by men, unless those men are homos, and because they produce and rear children.
The worth of things to society is determined by how greatly they're desired by men? Solid take.