Are you familiar with self driving trucks?
People can shit on the tech all they want, they will be replacing drivers in the very near term.
I'll take it.
For number 2: a lot of religious exemption laws specifically require that it be a position or doctrine of an "established" religion. So yes, "proof" that religious leaders said the same thing is actually required much of the time. It's how religious exemption gets quietly denied. It shouldn't be that way, but it often is.
As for number 1, well, that's just the most legally defensible position of the above.
Those in a position where they actually need such a document are already fighting an uphill battle to use the law to protect them. The correct course of action is of course to quit the job, don't go to the college, etc. If "I refuse" isn't good enough for them, they are evil and you should turn the other way.
The military is the tough one though, and if they haven't already stood their ground on all the other injections they've been stuck with, it's very unlikely any piece of paper is going to save them from this one. I expect dishonorable discharge for refusing will soon be the only way out for them.
2020 election steal?
Notice they did not have to change the eyebrows or the eyelashes to make him look like a tranny.
Is it time to start normalizing the collapse because they are about to trigger it?
For a long time I wasn't sure if Musk was in or out of the club, but after his praising China, it's pretty obvious he's just playing a part.
More likely because of the massive loss of life from all the flooding. They are claiming something ridiculous like 40 deaths? Entire cities are flooded.
It was the best channel on tv durring the farscape and SG1 era.
Then they got a CEO that hated scifi, dropped all their originals, canceled their highest rated shows, produced that SGUniverse abomination, and used it as proof that scifi was dead so they could run the afore mentioned monster/ghost hunter shows 24/7.
Then they swapped that idiot out for a raging feminist and changed the name to seefee because it would appeal to women more. And it all went downhill from their.
I was almost willing to tolerate Dark Matter and Killjoys, but they both went to absolute crap with astounding speed. That was pretty much my last attempt to watch anything current.
That was the point. It isn't to make us all be more accepting and loving and peace filled world of hippy dippy communists, it to drive division and create animosity where non previously existed.
Try and keep you're ire on those who are pushing this BS. When the time comes, we have to go for the hydra heads, not the pantifa and black looters matter in the streets like they want.
Let's find out the medical rationale
Latches, No Standing.
That too.
Astro turfed to the nines. Heavily here on the .win too.
When the wave comes you can't say a single word about crypto without getting dogpiled. Then a few weeks later, it's back to reasonable apprehension and suspicion as the norm whenever the subject comes up, with maybe one or two true believers around.
Next time something big hits the media, see if you can spot the wave of astroturfing that happens around here.
One successful quantum computer and all digital "security" as we know it ceases to exist.
People can argue till they are blue in the face over when and where it will happen, but once it does all crypto is as valuable as a 1990s CD key. The industry heads are all saying we are less than 10 years away, quantum computing is essentially functional, it's a matter of stability and scale before an actual "chip" is attached to an interface and the most complex mathematical problems on earth are thrown at it to see what it can do.
It's a literal expiration date for crypto and there is no plan, nor can there even be a plan, to fix or update it. Governments and banks can roll out new currency to replace the old if it becomes a risk for them, but decentralized crypto will simply become worthless. It will of course crash long before it's hacked as news of the computer and it's capabilities will be something of a shot heard round the cyber world.
Anyone who doesn't think this is going to happen, or simply chooses to ignore it, is only out to pump and dump a speculative currency off the backs of their followers.
Anyone who is seriously pushing crypto has to be completely ignorant to the fact this is all planned and pushed by actual people. They aren't going to allow some bitcoin powered mad max civilization to rise from the ashes, they are going to destroy anything that isn't a part of their ultimate ideal society, by any means necessary.
They also have no actual legitimate plan for when crypto becomes hackable in ~10 years.
Menzies was attempting to ask Lantsman questions about her involvement in lobbying on behalf of Walmart during Ontario's lengthy lockdown.
Touched a nerve I guess.
The average difficulty has changed quite drastically over the years. Games now commonly have a normal mode that would have been "easy" in 2010. And games in 2010 the normal mode would have been the easy mode back in 2000.
In 2000 the "normal" mode was still quite challenging, and hard was usually something close to impossible if you didn't already know the normal mode inside and out.
My reflexes have reduced quite dramatically as I get older, and I can't quite keep up with some of the older games now, but I play anything recent on the highest difficulty or it ends up being a cakewalk.
I can barely manage the first level of Halo 2 on Heroic mode anymore, and I used to play through on Legendary and thought it was fun. The only challenge to be found in most modern games is in broken or intentionally gimped mechanics.
There is nothing wrong with easy mode, but when a person who's singular purpose in life is to review games will only play on the "press A to win" difficulty level, they are being utterly disingenuous with their so called review.
I couldn't count how many games have mechanics that don't even come into play in easy mode. How do you assess balance? Or replayability, or any of the things that actually should matter in a game review.
When he went full-vegan in 2018
There's your problem right there.
No fatty acids == No functional brain.
That's a damn good definition, actually.
Pretty sure that's just the water flowing, looks like a light on the wall that isn't moving.
Um, maybe it's time to get OUT of the subway car?
Apparently, in an effort to escape the prospect of a simulation which predicts rising temperatures that might have effected it's natural habitat with a .2 degree change sometime in the future, it decided to "flee" thousands of miles north into frigged waters 20 degrees colder than it's natural habitat.
Can't get much dumber than that.
- Unified identification across the globe = Ultimate control.
They need a foot in the door to get everyone on the same identification system, the vax pass is it. They'll be clamoring for a unified one soon.
- Tying that ID to your online activity = Ultimate censorship.
This is already being pushed around by things like Canada's bill c-10. It's a necessary component of policing online speech.
- Tying your digital currency to your digital ID = Unlimited control.
Government programs will be dictating what you can and can't spend your own money on, imaging the "non-essentials" being blocked by your bank, and not just a government order. UK banks have already been bragging about this possibility. Social credit score on steroids.
That's the goal. With or without a depop agenda as a side course, that's where all of this is headed.
It's legit in that it is recognized by the government. Quite a large number of smaller churches and groups utilize their "ordination" to allow the pastor to legally preform marriages, as proof of ordination is required when filing the license with the local county.
It would "help," in that some religious exemption laws require your reasoning to be doctrine of an established religion. You might not need any additional proof if you can show that you are a "licensed preacher."
I say might, cause there's no guarantee that would work. I think we are going to see a lot of religious exemption claims denied. When people in power have already decided people don't have the right to refuse, they will just ignore things they see as nothing more than a loophole.