50 shades of Grey has entered the chat...
but that's not a statement on quality, just a testament to the phrase "sex sells", and when thirsty girls and women are involved, "sex sells A LOT"
True, but also never miss an opportunity to point out that they are indeed snakes, vermin, trash, scum, douchebags of the highest order.
The other half are... dead accounts =)
The "Anal is for everyone" poster in the background was a horrible, but accurate detail.
Or in the cleansing fire of the "and suddenly, for no reason at all" movement.
TRANANANANANANANANA
CALL THAT MY PER-I-OD
I know it's unlikely, but imagine getting turned down by Jonathan "full" McIntosh- the blow to her ego would be crushing.
I don't know if you forgot to mention or just don't know, there have been efforts to develop male birth control that were shut down because that would give men more control over when to have a child.
from a third world country
dude, she's from England.... yeah, you're right, carry on.
What, you think they won't do the same with bugs? That they'll only serve premium BOOG tm for your culinary delight? As soon as they can they'll be mixing all the worst parts of the bug together or cutting it with sawdust or something to make it even worse, but slightly cheaper to manufacture.
BREAKING: School lunches to be banned in Welsh schools
While inspin is better logically speaking, femcel has much stronger memetic power. They are the female equivalent of an incel- a loser. Like I said, the dynamic between men and women is different, so men lose by not getting sex, women lose by not getting commitment. If you want to label a woman who can't get a partner to commit to them, the commonly used word is femcels.
They're called femcels. Incels are men who can't get sex; femcels are women who can't get relationships.
Actually they did, on multiple levels, but when you're in power and the only person investigating you for wrong doing is you, you can afford to make any number of egregious mistakes.
Spot on. If someone tells you they're a fan, but wants to change what they're supposedly a fan of, then they're not a fan- they are lying to you.
I'd go further: the only people that complain about gatekeeping are the people it's good to keep out.
There's almost always no other barrier than "liking the thing and participating", and even if a community wants to keep out certain types of people, you can just make your own community to enjoy it with like-minded individuals. Otherwise, it's just selfish "grass is greener" and "I want what you have because you have it and I don't" thinking.
Technically correct since you should be exercising outside in the sun and fresh air if the weather is good enough. Gonna bet that isn't the theme of this article...
EDIT: at least doesn't outright say stop exercising, just a token line at the bottom to do it in a well-ventilated, sparsely populated gym after multiple paragraphs of scaremongering. Imagine still being this afraid of Covid and probably after multiple jabs
Uniparty. It's all the same powerful people from the same globalist club working towards a future in which they have more power and keep their position secure. They like the decay because it benefits them and they don't have to suffer the consequences of it.
Build back better, new normal, new world order, etc etc
Something I noticed in her wording: it's always tame the man. Tame tame tame, like some sort of beast; it should be forged because good men are made, not torn down into a lesser, servile form. A tame man won't give you protection, a made man will be hardened against the adversity he'll need to face to keep you safe as you so desperately desire.
The Tories spent so long getting rammed by Labour that they seem to have developed a stiff upper backside. Now, instead of Labour going in dry, we get lubed-up labour i.e. a slightly slower, gentler fucking from the "Conservatives in name only"
"Nobody should be allowed to have guns" shouts the upper class elite from behind armed private security.
I think it's less than that: the useful idiots just want attention- to stand out and get noticed. Like you said, they want to be trail blazers, but there's nothing left to discover or fight for. Bereft of anything substantive to fight for, they can only ignore what's gone before and try ever more specific sub-categories of "first X to do Y".
No, that's his daughter- literally paid for the invitro using the ad money
The comments are so cucked that the only shot that can cure them is lead.
If you replace most of the characters in a "straight" story with gay ones, most of the time very little would change unless there's romance involved. If you take the homosexuality out of the gay characters in an LGBT story, the story wouldn't work at all because you just removed 90% of their character traits.