we no longer live in a culture that incentivises perseverance in marriage
Well yeah. Feminism destroyed any reason for Princess to stay with the dude she married because she gets to keep all the benefits of marriage in the divorce without having to hold her up end of the bargain. That's why they initiate something like 80% of the divorces. If you want marriage to hold up you need to do something about the fact that our "family" law is so anti-family.
The top comment is also great. This whore got knocked up and had every opportunity to terminate the pregnancy if she felt like it. She refused because she saw a chance to extort the father for money so she wouldn't ever have to work again. I'm surprised the divorce court hasn't enslaved the dude, but he's absolutely right. She made her bed and she can get fucked in it.
Marriage or long term cohabitation is a disadvantageous situation for men. The odds of divorce or separation initiated by women are high and divorce and family courts are biased again men as evidenced by their clear results: 97% of alimony payers are men, in more than 80% of all cases women are granted child custody, assets are split 50/50 or worse, regardless of which partner contributed or earned most of those assets (largely the men).
There is no rational case for marriage that justifies the poor risk/benefit ratio for men.
It's not men specifically, it's the earner who is punished.
It's hard to tell because the man is the earner in almost all cases (because hypergamy). The children almost always go with the woman because she either a) doesn't work or b) can easily convince her employer to give her family leave, usually because the job is clerical and she can be replaced or covered for.
The courts see the earner as feminists see the earner, as an eternal ATM.
I think this is actually causing some backlash towards career oriented women. Those "deadbeat dad's" mentioned are the men who weren't out-earning the woman; she "wanted it all" and took the kids and the high paying job, so these men essentially tell her to fuck off and there she is.
the end stage of feminism is developing their hatred of men into realizing marriage is an effective feminist institution to enslave and punish men. This is like galaxy brained, 4d super feminism. Tradcucks on suicide watch
Something I noticed in her wording: it's always tame the man. Tame tame tame, like some sort of beast; it should be forged because good men are made, not torn down into a lesser, servile form. A tame man won't give you protection, a made man will be hardened against the adversity he'll need to face to keep you safe as you so desperately desire.
A man who is aroused by violence is a man to steer well clear of. He may use the vocabulary of BDSM (bondage and masochism) to excuse his behaviour, but if he can maintain an erection while beating a woman, then he isn’t safe to be alone with.
Unbased and cringepilled. The rest is great though.
They'd probably stab me in the back (literally) and take my shit.
Nah, here's where I think you still misunderstand women. They will probably kill you, but they won't do it themselves, they'd find a man to do it for them, offering themselves as a reward. This is the way women have operated for thousands of years, and will operate for thousands of years to come.
Let's make it so child support is audited to be spent only on the child
That's what I've been saying. The money should go into a separate account linked to a debit card, and Princess should be required to upload the receipts of any purchase made with the debit card. No one is going to believe their "best interests of the child" bullshit as long as they don't give a fuck if the money is actually being spent on the child.
Well yeah. Feminism destroyed any reason for Princess to stay with the dude she married because she gets to keep all the benefits of marriage in the divorce without having to hold her up end of the bargain. That's why they initiate something like 80% of the divorces. If you want marriage to hold up you need to do something about the fact that our "family" law is so anti-family.
The top comment is also great. This whore got knocked up and had every opportunity to terminate the pregnancy if she felt like it. She refused because she saw a chance to extort the father for money so she wouldn't ever have to work again. I'm surprised the divorce court hasn't enslaved the dude, but he's absolutely right. She made her bed and she can get fucked in it.
Lying?
It's feminism.
Gaslighting.
Female solipsism.
"Occasionally, progressive will reverse engineer healthy sexual behavior and act like they discovered Atlantis."
- Auron MacIntyre
Marriage or long term cohabitation is a disadvantageous situation for men. The odds of divorce or separation initiated by women are high and divorce and family courts are biased again men as evidenced by their clear results: 97% of alimony payers are men, in more than 80% of all cases women are granted child custody, assets are split 50/50 or worse, regardless of which partner contributed or earned most of those assets (largely the men).
There is no rational case for marriage that justifies the poor risk/benefit ratio for men.
Do not cohabitate. Do not marry.
It's not men specifically, it's the earner who is punished.
It's hard to tell because the man is the earner in almost all cases (because hypergamy). The children almost always go with the woman because she either a) doesn't work or b) can easily convince her employer to give her family leave, usually because the job is clerical and she can be replaced or covered for.
The courts see the earner as feminists see the earner, as an eternal ATM.
I think this is actually causing some backlash towards career oriented women. Those "deadbeat dad's" mentioned are the men who weren't out-earning the woman; she "wanted it all" and took the kids and the high paying job, so these men essentially tell her to fuck off and there she is.
the end stage of feminism is developing their hatred of men into realizing marriage is an effective feminist institution to enslave and punish men. This is like galaxy brained, 4d super feminism. Tradcucks on suicide watch
So much word salad that could have been summerised as "feminism is cancer and it's killing it's intended beneficiaries".
I couldn't even get to the end of one article without her losing the plot; I'm not buying a whole book.
Women cannot be responsible & accountable at the same time.
Clearly, after we ban abortion, Plan B needs to be outlawed as well.
Something I noticed in her wording: it's always tame the man. Tame tame tame, like some sort of beast; it should be forged because good men are made, not torn down into a lesser, servile form. A tame man won't give you protection, a made man will be hardened against the adversity he'll need to face to keep you safe as you so desperately desire.
Unbased and cringepilled. The rest is great though.
Nah, here's where I think you still misunderstand women. They will probably kill you, but they won't do it themselves, they'd find a man to do it for them, offering themselves as a reward. This is the way women have operated for thousands of years, and will operate for thousands of years to come.
I'm rooting for you to get a harem that'll police itself and stab any cunt that would try to ice you.
That's what I've been saying. The money should go into a separate account linked to a debit card, and Princess should be required to upload the receipts of any purchase made with the debit card. No one is going to believe their "best interests of the child" bullshit as long as they don't give a fuck if the money is actually being spent on the child.
Or until the rise of the robots at least.