Yep, textbook case. Eat a man's cum and she gets credit for everything he does. I've also heard of cases where men got married during college, and the courts declared that the college degree was owed to the women due to her awesome 'support' (because no man graduates without a wife??). Therefore the degree was half hers, and she was entitled to half of all his future earnings BEFORE asset division (so she gets 3/4 minimum).
You can't limit divorce terms with a prenup. All prenups that try to fix divorce terms are tossed out on the grounds they are 'coercive.' The woman will always argue that she had no choice but to sign it (which is insane, but nevermind).
You can only exclude preexisting assets from the marriage and only if the funds are never touched for the entire duration of the marriage. If you have a separate bank account and one time you use it to buy a cup of coffee, it is now community property. Only assets sealed away completely in a trust or similar vehicle can be excluded. Money you make while married will always be considered 'hers'. Even if you try to say your business had nothing to do with her, they'll say her 'support' was what made you the money and give her a cut.
The purpose of prenups was originally to protect rich heiress's from having their family fortunes stolen by handsome losers. Attempts by men to use them to limit divorce settlements are viewed very harshly by the courts.
Until somewhat recently it was church dogma that jews were damned for deicide unless they converted. The capture of Christians by "judeo-christianity" is really a huge win for them.
Non-competes have to be pretty narrowly written. They would have to show that Jared working for another company would directly harm Crowder's revenue, and since Jared isn't "Talent" that seems dubious.
Jews turned the temple into a house of thieves, so Jesus whipped them. They never forgave him for it.
Troons mad
I hear that so much it's ridiculous. They really think all rich people are on the right. They've never been in a conference room with 12 people who's net worth exceeds a billion dollars, eating $200/plate catered lunches, listening to a black consultant lecture them on what racist pieces of shit they are.
It's not complicated. The way you get famous as a woman on the internet is to do what men do but with less clothing on.
It's a manifestation of the iron law of "Tits or GTFO." Women are generally inferior at everything so the only way to get attention is by also being hot.
A sane society wouldn't allow this, but here we are.
My wife was disgusted playing D4 because she wanted to be the druid but the only choice is hideous hambeast. She played the fat guy instead.
Seriously, what the shit is this?
100% chance of god's special people being involved.
Pick a topic where the media narrative is completely false and expose it. Assuming they'll listen to you, this is very easy. Just show a picture of Joe Biden groping a kid. Boom, done. Or ask them how many black people Kyle Rittenhouse shot. Or how much Fentanyl George Floyd was on. Find something they "know" is correct and show them 100% irrefutable evidence that it's false. Once you plant the seed of distrust, nothing can stop it from growing. That's why the left tries to shut down any right-wing ideas at all. The truth is like a lion, set it free and it defends itself.
It's interesting how they're using legal arguments and intimidation. I'd prefer a squad who never says a word and just breaks all their legs.
The way so many people think work exists as an entitlement is just bizarre.
How is it falling apart? Seems like bad projects fail and good ones succeed. That's the way life works.
"no u," the movement.
That southern girl is not in any way a "tomboy." She has long hair, wears makeup in every video, and flaunts her body. A tomboy is a girl who dresses like a man and hides her femininity, like the character Watts from Some Kind of Wonderful.
That chick is just doing the standard online attention whore bit of "do something men do while wearing less clothing to get famous."
They gave Alec Baldwin's character plenty of great zingers. Another example of making a 'parody' of a dumb right winger who only ends up seeming cool and based.
Interesting. I caught episodes of it here and there, didn't know this.
Historically there were a few crimes that were technically illegal but always acquitted. Killing someone in a duel, killing a man for sleeping with your wife, etc. This probably qualifies. The state would basically say "please don't pop off like this again, but we get it." That's when the state identified with the people it rules though, instead of viewing us as commodities.
The defense argument was insane though. Probably legally necessary but reading it makes my brain hurt. Something about "he went temporarily insane from trauma...". Bullshit. Guy fucked with his kid, so he made him un-alive. It's the most sane and understandable instinct a father can have.
"Why not" is the real question.
How has society gotten so cucked that this was even asked? No medieval peasant would wonder why a father would kill his son's abuser.
"The platform" you mean, people posting shit you guys did?
There's a way to avoid it but it's an example of "grasping the nettle." I don't blame men for not trying.