To repeat my argument from the other thread, I believe that abortion contributes to the problems #2 and #3 are supposed to be preventing. Culling the leftist population isn't a clean cut - training them to believe murdering a child out of convenience makes them worse people, and once they've done it they are never going to confront their beliefs and admit they are monsters.
all Republicans have to do is renege on their position on abortion
I still say this is a shortsighted idea. Drugs, trans nonsense and abortion aren't just carrots the left waves over the heads of their followers, they are tools to radicalise them. Train a leftist to kill their own child, and they will gladly kill yours.
There are obviously practical issues with making it an illegal strategy, but a lawyer should not knowingly make frivolous legal arguments any more than they should file frivolous lawsuits. Morally speaking, making a legal argument you know is false for tactical benefit should get you smacked down.
That's just stupid. Say shit like that, and people are going to start suggesting punitive damages delivered by firing squad. At most you should be arguing that although you've tried to accommodate the needs of an allergic person, at the end of the day it's a public restaurant and you cannot completely remove the possibility of cross-contamination.
I'd point to the simpler piece of evidence that Biden told everyone on video that he was going to destroy the pipeline, before somebody destroyed the pipeline. You don't have to be a superdetective to find the shooter when the first suspect is the guy who said "I am going to kill you."
I created an account years ago, and it was immediately suspended for "suspected bot activity" demanding my phone number. I wasn't going to give in to an obvious shakedown so I abandoned the account. I haven't tried getting the account unsuspended or creating a new account since Musk took over, but if the same non-rule rule is in place I'm not doing it.
I imagine it does them no favours that their archnemesis is Pakistan, while China's is the United States. They're bound to be investing less in trying to beat their neighbour than China does in trying to be the best on the planet.
he was citing historical precedent for Ukraine and Crimea.
Russia has a legitimate case for war, but this isn't it. Point to the pro-Russian candidate winning the 2010 election, being overthrown on the grounds that his opponent's supporters lived within rioting distance of the capital and his did not with the direct support of the US State Department via Victoria Nuland (in violation of the Budapest memorandum), the subsequent killings of thousands of ethnic Russians and the revolutionary government's declaration that two out of three democratically elected presidents are traitors against their anti-democratic rule. Point out that the American-backed coup to force Ukraine into the Western sphere of influence isn't the same as Finland or Poland choosing of their own volition to side with NATO but part of a deliberate strategy of regime change by Obama's State Department starting with Russia's allies in Ukraine and Syria that would have ended with the overthrow of Russia itself.
This law introduced by the Conservatives will bite them in the backside as it will be used against those creating electoral communications that are critical of the ruling Labour Party.
The Tories buried a report about Labour's crimes against the British people. Those Tories are going to be fine.
Monkeypox only killed the intersection of two groups: people infected with AIDS, and people with close physical contact with complete degenerates. As a result it is not a public health emergency but a literal lifesaver, because anyone who dies instantly from monkeypox would otherwise be spending the next few decades infecting as many people as possible with AIDS.
Case in point, Starship Troopers the film is supposed to be making fun of the "space nazis" and pointing out that they are the bad guys, but people started identifying with them because of poor writing and they're fun so leftists are melting down over it.
That's the midwit reading of Starship Troopers. The actual meaning of Starship Troopers is "Verhoeven is an illiterate fuckwit who doesn't understand the book he's slandering."
The atom bombs promised the Japanese military leadership a death without honour. There would be no glorious last stand; they would surrender, or we would exterminate them like vermin. Even to a death cult that did not believe in mercy for the conquered, this was enough to shake their resolve.
The people who pretend that Japan didn't need or deserve to be nuked are at best useful idiots parroting an enemy propagandist. The claim is just another facet of the Marxists' attempts to pretend the Westerner has no culture, no achievements and no moral mandate.