I've heard conflicting information about all this - not sure if it was local police or the Sheriff's office, for one, and hoo BOY does it make a difference sometimes - but the one piece of information that's being left out sheds light on everything - the police/sheriff that picked the kid up?
Female.
I'm putting my money down that the female cop/sheriff got her panties twisted when the mom didn't RESPEC HER AUTHORITAY and decided to make a big fuss out of all of this, evidenced by how she dropped the kid off and then later CAME BACK.
Women in positions of authority. Not even once.
I mean, the reason they weren't united is because they all hated one another.
Liberals really don't want to think about it, but part of the reason the US had little issue overall rolling up on the various natives is because they were busying fighting and killing one another. And they had no issue whatsoever using all the latest and greatest technology to get revenge on past grievances.
I love the fact that RKF Jr's radical stance basically boils down to 'Hey, maybe we shouldn't be stuffing the latest shit into our body without knowing the full long-term consequences of using the damn thing.'
It's so refreshing to see.
Days Gone is such a weird game. On paper, it looks like it would be alot better than it actually is, but in action the combat/stealth/travel/shooting/verticality just comes across as... clunky. Akward. You get all these options, and none of them just work.
It's frustrating, cause it's got alot of neat parts that are unique enough you kind of want them in a better game.
Listening to the radio broadcast was always funny, cause no matter how much the MC bitched about what he was saying, none of what the radio guy was saying was wrong.
Full-auto investors are on edge and screaming, right now.
Come to think, that would absolutely brutalize the full-auto market. Fuck. I've always seen full-auto as a bit of a gimmick(nice to have, but not critical), but man...
More seriously, this is me just putting some skin in the game. I don't think the ATF can just nix the 200$ pre-charge right off the bat, but I could be wrong?
If Brandon becomes the head of the ATF, I will finally give in to my co-workers harassment and buy a suppressor.
...I wish I was surprised that these are a thing that exist.
As for fatherless behavior... eh. Alot of women really, really hate being in charge. At the end of the day, they want the safety of being told want to do. Mind, that doesn't stop that from getting caught up in some crossed-wiring, hence their rather schizophrenic behavior from time to time...
Rope is even cheaper.
Still used in Japan, by the way!
I loved the video some guy did on the process, with the title talking up how horrific the process was, only to have the replies flooded with people saying 'Yeah, no, I'm not seeing the horrific part. Seems sensible enough to me.'
Yeah, I was honestly surprised by the contrast. He goes alot more black-pilled on his twitter stuff than youtube.
Recently it feels like he's gone from 'black-pilled' to 'rip-and-tear pilled' given how vitriolic he's been before and after the recent election.
It's Hoe_Math's shctick. He deliberately dumbs-down and cutesifies alot of what he talks about to try and get through to dumb normies.
Apparently it works? To some degree? I think he's bitched about before - the moment he tries to go 'serious' he gets an abnormal amount of push-back and defensive arguing, but playing his graphs up as 'harmless' seems to slip past alot of mental defenses.
I'm reasonably certain that the actual book in question that developed the argument 'paradox of tolerance' doesn't actually say what midwit liberals think it says. By this point, I'm going to have to track down a copy of the book and read the damn thing.
...which doesn't exactly sound like a bad thing. Going by some chapter synopsis, a number of chapters seem to go into how Marx was a fucking idiot, so it'll be entertaining, if nothing else.
Femcels are the ones that can't get chad to fuck them, so there's no legs to close.
Not an official term, mind, just a personal observation. Morbid curiosity when stumbling across several self-labeled 'femcels' drove me down that rabbit hole, and I started finding several trends - it's not that they can't get sex, it's that they can't get sex from the men they think they deserve.
It also tracks from what I've seen of a few 'Forever Alone' forums. Where men have a dry spell of thier entire lives, women can have a dry spell of a few years and stumble in thinking they're going to receive sympathy of how it's so painful, only to receive vitriolic hatred in response.
Part of the reason for this is women themselves; a large number of them viscerally loathe the idea of a man working to improve themselves in the social arena - they desire a man who 'just gets it' and the notion that a man could be a 'fake' alpha and still be successful with them makes them physically ill.
This is why Pick-up Artists made women loose their shit so much.
My brain has promptly shit the bed as to what the specific term is, but it basically goes 'The likelihood of a single data point in a sample being unique or uncommon is slim to none.'
If we've stumbled across this in what amounts to a complete accident, the possibility that it's common is a very strong one.
NAMBLA was part of the LGBT circus tent until the 1990s.
They forcibly hushed-hushed all that to make it more palatable to the normies. And here we are.
Don't forget this was after years and years of both Obama and Hillary saying Russia wasn't a threat and mocking the GOPs insistent to consider Russia a potential enemy.
And, for some strange reason, we've got liberals coming out of the woodworks, foaming at the mouth and shrieking about killing ziggers.
Come to think, I wonder if all those Ukraine threads on /k will drop off all of a sudden...
There is no universal federal registry, as treatment of sex offenders vary from state to state - hell, it can even vary from county to county in terms of what information is displayed or shown depending on what level they're assigned to, which ALSO varies from state to state and county to county.
You can find databases online where you can search for them, but this is because they're compiling multiple different sources together. And that isn't taking into account the ones that actively scrape others for data, which can be an absolute pain in the ass for various reasons.
If he's so bent out of shape the way Nebraska treats sex offenders, the stupid fuck can go move to California. They love sex offenders there.
Right now, if there's going to be any serious rioting, it'll probably be in Washington DC around election day.
California wise, you'll likely have to deal more with druggies and people shitting in the streets than rioting.
Also, if you've never visited Zion National Park before, be warned, it's busy as fuck. Even during the semi-off season. Fall is probably the best time to visit it, though. Enjoy all the trees changing color.
I'm a little annoyed due to lacking any further data - if all these women breaking for Trump were married, that explains it.
If they're single, though... that's a huge ground shift. Yuge, you might say.
Minorities, however... yeah, I wonder how many Democrats are looking at these numbers and considering doing a game over. Even 16% of black men for Trump is stupidly high compared to where they're normally at.
The best stick of dynamite will always be the one that belongs to your enemy that you get to throw back at them.
My only complaint I have about Aydins' stuff is 1) It's typically a solid block of information with no pause(not a bad thing, but...) and 2) I would kill to have a proper essay/transcript so I can reference everything she brings up later as need be.
I wish Youtube Essayers as a whole would just write their shit down so I can read it.
(Also, what the hell is it with Monarchists popping up as of late? I could venture a few guesses there...)
Women absolutely loathe sexually non-successful men.
It's why you see them use the term 'incel' in utterly ludicrous and insane cases to describe a man... who's happily married with children.
That...
Hmm.
Keep in mind, that it's been a while since I took my Chinese history cources, and Chinese history is fucking insane, especially in the early 20th century, so forgive any lapses, but...
...it's important to keep in mind that the Chinese were basically having a civil war during the entire brou-ha-ha of WW2 which was basically Mao Ze Dong's side(The KMT? Gah, it's been a while) and the Nationalists side.
You... MIGHT have seen instances where the Germans sided with Mao to fight the Japanese, but it's not like the Nationalists liked thier American allies all that much - I recall atleast one instance where Nationalist forces basically joked to the Americans 'Ha ha wouldn't it be HILARIOUS if we started shooting at you' and the Americans basically went 'Ha ha wouldn't it be HILARIOUS if we started shooting back'. China and American might have been allied during WW1 and best buds at the time, but by WW2 China had basically undergone... uh... SEVERAL political revolutions, so the ruling political faction really had no correlation between then and now.
Then there's the added fun that the entire conflict between China and Japan started in, what, 1938? 1939? When was that stupid conflict on the bridge - bah, whatever. Too tired to do the research.
So, assuming an isolated Japan... yeah, they basically get gang-banged between Germany/China, Russia, and America. Conversely, America would get stuck in a two-way war between Germany/China and Japan... then again, would America even be fighting Germany by this point?
Yeah, you weren't wrong. That is some CRAZY bullshit.
Scott Adams did a post/article a while back where he got absolutely fed up and basically said white people can't live and/or be safe around black people.
Cue the pearl clutching and outrage.
So, yeah, it's basically random shitposting and trolling by this point.
I peaked in on Synthetic Man playing it, and man, I was not impressed.
When he couldn't even shoot the crippled mechanic - yeah, they clearly had an agenda putting this shit together.
Plus, the overall game just looks... Well, not bad, but it more or less looks identical to the original Stalker with a graphics update or Stalker Anomaly. If I want to play Stalker, why would I waste money on playing Stalker 2?