My theory personally is that in like vietname, public sentiment forced the end of the war at the point where everyone knew someone who's kid had been killed in the war.
This is the modern creation, they're deliberately threatening your children, you're supposed to intercede and stop them. If you can't, it's like sending your kids off to be killed in a pointless war.
"We failed to protect people simply taking the subway to work, let's look around...what 3rd party can we blame for our own sins?
I know! Let's blame the guy who did protect people!
Remember, you're never safe with us in charge!
These are the kind of people that saw with rittenhouse, a teenager being assaulted by a multi-conviction sex offender of little boys, and their response was that rittenhouse should have let the guy do what he wanted.
These are the kind of genuinely sadistic and evil people behind stuff like this.
P.S. The major political figures in New York at first responded saying that people had the right to defend themselves. Then someone shows up behind the scenes for them, and a couple of days later they're saying this is unjust and must persecuted.
Who is it that's driving this?
The moment there's an official announce it's over and done with.
He hasn't named anyone but this is their established pattern, they get upset that twitter started standing up to the lie that white men are the biggest murders and purveyors of violence, so they send in a white women to take over and move the narrative back to "if you have white skin and you're a man you're bad".
Every time you start to see sanity:
New York City Mayor Eric Adams and Gov. Kathy Hochul drew criticism for their initial responses to Neely’s death.
Hochul weighed in on May 3, saying, “There are consequences for behavior.”
Someone behind the scenes shows up and insists the beating of the peasants must continue:
She seemed to walk back her statements in a news conference a day later, saying that Neely’s family “deserves justice.” Adams initially highlighted the right of subway riders to take action in certain situations. His messaging had changed by Wednesday, however, when he called Neely’s death “a tragedy that never should have happened.”
How would you describe whoever is pushing this behind the scenes, other than as evil?
This person would be picking up and running every couple of years without any outside influence.
It's part of their personality...they slowly make any environment they're in insufferable, then they can't stand living with what they've created, so they run to a new place looking to do the same thing again.
We're talking about people pushed into slicing off healthy body parts.
Most major national medical associations agree gender-affirming care is safe and effective.
They've learned that lying works.
Someone I know was diagnosed with breast cancer and had her breasts removed. She describes it as the most painful and traumatizing event of her life.
They abuse people, lie that they're helping them, keep on abusing them. They're evil.
I enjoy the article but find it impossible (pun...) to agree with OP's take on it.
You have all the feminist b.s. all in one place.
Women havings kids makes them worthless...somehow “I don’t consider this feminist. It’s antifeminist...I’m not a vessel for offspring. Am I not worth anything in myself?”
Women not smart enough to handle views outside The Narrative
"It is incredibly condescending. High achieving young people are perfectly capable of deciding whether or not to have children”. (but apparently not smart enough to think about a different viewpoint)
Bigotry and misogny is when women consider views outside The Narrative
“I think a lot of students are understandably quite hurt that an institution as respected as Cambridge seems to promote bigotry to its students”. While they are “not anti free speech,” they maintain that “misogyny and transphobia have no place in this University, even if some old dons want to keep them here”.
First car I owned wasn't work fixing at 140k. Rust panels on the sides, alignment that couldn't be fixed so you had to drive with the wheel turned to one side, and like 6 other things wrong with it.
I bought a Prius...and the battery pack is still good 14 years later...I think it's at 250k now?
I don't really trust "research" on this stuff because it's typically a whole lot of crap. None of the b.s.ing on about the Prius turned out to be true. There's a couple of things I dislike about it...none of those things were what the online crowd was whining on about though. Literally all the things they said were bad about it weren't true, and all the things that actually were bad on it weren't mentioned online.
I don't really trust the anti-EV articles any more than the pro-EV ones.
This just sounds like he got ripped off by his repair place.
He went on to say that the insurance company for the woman who rear-ended him assessed the damage, estimated the repairs would cost $1,600 and wrote him a check for that amount. ...
Turns out, they were more than $40,000 off the mark.
The shop he sent his truck to "completely disassembled" the back of the truck, according to Apfelstadt, and discovered much more damage than previously thought based on exterior inspection alone — so much more that the "final bill" for his fender bender came to more than $42,000. Apfelstadt told Just The News the "at-fault driver's insurance covered the entire repair bill" since her policy had a $50,000 cap.
Repair place saw big $$$ that would get covered automatically by the insurance company and moved in.
Can you name a famous black american? Of course you can. How did black peoples income level change between 1960 and now? It didn't.
Can you name a famous white petson? Same thing, of course you can, incomes haven't changed.
Ditto with native americans.
And hispanics.
But Indians - the country in asia next to china - their income levels went from below average, to the #2 spot. Can name any famous Indians? If you don't know tech ceos probably not.
Then there's the #1 group who you're largely prohibited from talking about at all.
Just sayin'...seems like your group being talked about? Once that happens it's economic position will never, ever, change. Seems like it's better off to not be talked about.
What I liked about DeSantis was him standing up to the extremists.
All I see him doing here is jumping in with a different group of extremists. Or maybe it's the same group with a different narrative over their same goals.
I liked desantis because he was standing up extremists, now that he's just jumping onboard with other extremists he's nearly as bad as the rest.
Here's the key to understanding the language.
If they don't blame men, they know this is the fault of other women.
There was a whole thing about male managers - having experience with attractive women - preferrring less attractive women as employees. So much less drama. Mediocre looking a women find it much more difficult to skate by just on their looks, they're there for the same reason as the men - because contribute actual work.
Nearly every case they make public it turns out the woman is making accussations up.
How do they keep managing to pull this off?
The last one I remember a girl was receiving oral sex from an extremely attractive man in public. When the next day she found this was socially embarrassing, she was like "how can I blame shift this onto someone else? must have been rape now".
It was only after someone published the video of her rocking her hips, grabbing his head, and moaning, that they stopped believing being interested - at which point they just moved to their next target of fake and hysterical accussations.
It's not hard to understand why the individual pushes these.
"No sane man would touch me, and if I'm not getting laid no one else will either!
https://archive.ph/YMf6k/07588a0e5c97bd47dc466122d57ccb022ddfc73c.avif
But how on earth do they manage to keep being taken seriously
Thanks for the quote, I thought the same thing when I read the article.