Population collapse is 100% because of feminism. The only solution to the population collapse is rescinding women's "personhood" status and relegating them back to the kitchen. All other "solutions" will simply enslave men to women's benefit and prove disastrous.
Their fathers. If their father wasn't okay to pay for his daughter's existence, he shouldn't have put his dick inside another woman. Some men are fine paying to keep women around and if they want to, they should be allowed to; however, no one else in society should be forced to pay for women if they don't want to. I am proposing exactly that, while also solving the population "crisis".
I mean, I'm fine with killing the women to stop the pregnancy if she refuses an abortion... the thing is, plenty of men actually want children and want to support their children.
I enjoy the article but find it impossible (pun...) to agree with OP's take on it.
You have all the feminist b.s. all in one place.
Women havings kids makes them worthless...somehow
“I don’t consider this feminist. It’s antifeminist...I’m not a vessel for offspring. Am I not worth anything in myself?”
Women not smart enough to handle views outside The Narrative
"It is incredibly condescending. High achieving young people are perfectly capable of deciding whether or not to have children”. (but apparently not smart enough to think about a different viewpoint)
Bigotry and misogny is when women consider views outside The Narrative
“I think a lot of students are understandably quite hurt that an institution as respected as Cambridge seems to promote bigotry to its students”. While they are “not anti free speech,” they maintain that “misogyny and transphobia have no place in this University, even if some old dons want to keep them here”.
Imagine wanting the extinction of Humanity. Are you a member of Extinction Rebellion?
Population collapse is 100% because of feminism. The only solution to the population collapse is rescinding women's "personhood" status and relegating them back to the kitchen. All other "solutions" will simply enslave men to women's benefit and prove disastrous.
Their fathers. If their father wasn't okay to pay for his daughter's existence, he shouldn't have put his dick inside another woman. Some men are fine paying to keep women around and if they want to, they should be allowed to; however, no one else in society should be forced to pay for women if they don't want to. I am proposing exactly that, while also solving the population "crisis".
I mean, I'm fine with killing the women to stop the pregnancy if she refuses an abortion... the thing is, plenty of men actually want children and want to support their children.
Based.
Can't argue with hard data:
https://www.birthgap.org/posts/the-birthgap-maps-about-the-birthgap-maps
I enjoy the article but find it impossible (pun...) to agree with OP's take on it.
You have all the feminist b.s. all in one place.
Women havings kids makes them worthless...somehow “I don’t consider this feminist. It’s antifeminist...I’m not a vessel for offspring. Am I not worth anything in myself?”
Women not smart enough to handle views outside The Narrative
"It is incredibly condescending. High achieving young people are perfectly capable of deciding whether or not to have children”. (but apparently not smart enough to think about a different viewpoint)
Bigotry and misogny is when women consider views outside The Narrative
“I think a lot of students are understandably quite hurt that an institution as respected as Cambridge seems to promote bigotry to its students”. While they are “not anti free speech,” they maintain that “misogyny and transphobia have no place in this University, even if some old dons want to keep them here”.