Is strange how I thought Christian families that were curating their kids cartoons / movies were insane extremists and now I'm doing the same for my kids.
To be fair to you, the stuff the Christians were replacing it with was usually objectively bad due to cheap productions and "message first, YOLO the rest" writing. They were insane for thinking it would work.
I know this because I still own a lot of it, and was forced to watch a lot more. It was the kind of material to make you think all the stuff they were trying to protect you from was cool.
My theory personally is that in like vietname, public sentiment forced the end of the war at the point where everyone knew someone who's kid had been killed in the war.
This is the modern creation, they're deliberately threatening your children, you're supposed to intercede and stop them. If you can't, it's like sending your kids off to be killed in a pointless war.
And no matter which option, a coward who just stops responding when proven to be overtly wrong to pretend it doesn't happen and go rant on another thread.
The top result I get on bing is IMDB with Wikipedia over on the top right. Bing also includes this underneath the Wikipedia result: "Written by Nicole Dubuc · Dale Malinowski · Ant Ward"
Maybe the bing algorithm has detected your mental illness and decided to feed into it by excluding men from bad shit you search.
If you would like to give your kids anything to watch, don't go past 2004 without extreme vetting.
Your kids will be WAY more functional being raised on the old school 90s - early 2000s stuff and there's enough to last a childhood.
Careful around earlier, not for messaging but the set designers and writers were clearly on shrooms.
Is strange how I thought Christian families that were curating their kids cartoons / movies were insane extremists and now I'm doing the same for my kids.
Perspective and hindsight's a bitch isn't it?
Yeap
To be fair to you, the stuff the Christians were replacing it with was usually objectively bad due to cheap productions and "message first, YOLO the rest" writing. They were insane for thinking it would work.
I know this because I still own a lot of it, and was forced to watch a lot more. It was the kind of material to make you think all the stuff they were trying to protect you from was cool.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16b6DeaLjs/how-many-flame-throwers-do-we-ne/c/
My theory personally is that in like vietname, public sentiment forced the end of the war at the point where everyone knew someone who's kid had been killed in the war.
This is the modern creation, they're deliberately threatening your children, you're supposed to intercede and stop them. If you can't, it's like sending your kids off to be killed in a pointless war.
Also: The creative team is literally two dudes and this woman.
Now who's lying by omission. You picked the only woman on the creative team.
It's also directed by two men.
Look it up where? Wikipedia, IMDB, and everywhere else I looked listed the team. She's the only woman on the primary team.
Bing:
You're either lying, or actually so insane that when you see a woman's name your mind blanks out anything else.
The latter, definitely.
And no matter which option, a coward who just stops responding when proven to be overtly wrong to pretend it doesn't happen and go rant on another thread.
The top result I get on bing is IMDB with Wikipedia over on the top right. Bing also includes this underneath the Wikipedia result: "Written by Nicole Dubuc · Dale Malinowski · Ant Ward"
Maybe the bing algorithm has detected your mental illness and decided to feed into it by excluding men from bad shit you search.
Where's the lie...?
Not mentioning a woman was involved is not a lie by omission, unless there's a lot more context.
I didn't get that impression, and I doubt anyone else did either. Do explain your reasoning, though...
That's retarded.
Also, I clearly said 'reasoning,' and whatever that was wasn't that.
You're still not explaining how it's a 'lie by omission.'