I look forward to the vocal advocates of gender equality condemning this obvious act of sexism. Right?
And if you read the article, it's actually worse. It's based on the concept of "safety" for women. For men, the only way they can be deemed "safe" is if a woman decides they are worthy of a relationship. So if you're a single man, you're deemed a threat and a danger to women.
Condemning women's sexism is impossible. It's so intrinsic in their brains that you'd have to condemn their entire existence. There have been so many studies attempting to disprove it and they all confirm it.
Hilarity aside I can totally imagine given how bad London is the partner exemption being completely abused within five seconds. Given their inevitably shit security as well and poor planning expect the place to become a drug den within a year of the plan going ahead.
Much like how Marxism made a comeback as soon as people born too late to really see Communism’s failings firsthand started reaching adulthood, I suspect the history of the 21st century will be a story of people remaking the errors they weren’t around for the first time they were made.
I mean yeah. I can unironically see “Pruitt Igoe but woke” happening, but whitey can’t be allowed to have their own tower, so it would have to be one side black only, and the other side “whites allowed, but we’ll let anyone in”, lololol…
I swear it's always fucking London, for foreigners to understand London is to the rest of the UK what Los Angeles is to the rest of America. Even left wing people outside of London look at this fucking place in absolute horror. It's one of the few bi-partisan agreements we have in the country that the place is a universally recognised shithole. Interestingly we haven't seen a drug crisis pop up there yet but it's only a matter of time.
I’m imagining his argument is that LA is more “liberal” than NYC, which is arguable I guess…
But nah, you’re right, it is much more like NYC, in every possible way, “old money” cosmopolitan liberalism included…
Same with Sydney. People always compare it to LA, and Melbourne to NYC, but that’s really not true.
Large, financial, extremely cosmopolitan port cities which are also the largest in their respective countries - they all tend to have the same “issues”, as well as arguably perks… 🤷🏻♂️
But Melbourne likes to think it is NYC, because of course it does…
I mean either one works, there's a lot of famous people that live there too, but of course, they make sure they're in the high priced white enclaves no one else can afford.
Oh yeah, I mean I'm not 100% familiar with London as I try to avoid it as best as possible but yes Kensington and Chelsea are pretty renowned for being posh as fuck, Kensington would probably be the most posh. In general though London is a massively overpriced shithole where even the poor areas are just retarded.
They put up black bollards everywhere these days as well you may notice if you ever go to places like parliament square and that's to prevent trucks of peace from spreading their message and depending on where you go the places are controlled like a fortress. Ended up at one of the back end entrances of Buckingham Palace while having an explore and they've got armed police there with submachine guns lol.
Try plain concrete blocks. That’s what we have in Aus, in the major cities… 😑
Same exact reason, they just can’t be arsed even going to that effort, lol…
Unironically, I stayed in (or possibly very near) Kensington once. Accommodation was proper awful, though, so trust me, there’s still really shitty hotels, even among the extreme wealth that we’ve both evidently seen there, lol…
I only went past Bucks on the tourist bus (before London Bridge, but after the Underground shit), but I can totally imagine that, lol…
Tbf, parliament here (again, only in the major cities) has that, too.
Not so much places like the Opera House, though, but security there is still absurd, now.
Canberra, which is the capital of course, is a weird mixture of extreme over-policing (around any official government buildings), and complete lack of security on every other tourist attraction, thus allowing the Abos to literally trash each (see: Old Parliament House)…
I look forward to the vocal advocates of gender equality condemning this obvious act of sexism. Right?
And if you read the article, it's actually worse. It's based on the concept of "safety" for women. For men, the only way they can be deemed "safe" is if a woman decides they are worthy of a relationship. So if you're a single man, you're deemed a threat and a danger to women.
I look forward to the feminists that would be attracted to that sort of thing getting trapped in the tranny-roach-motel they created for themselves.
Condemning women's sexism is impossible. It's so intrinsic in their brains that you'd have to condemn their entire existence. There have been so many studies attempting to disprove it and they all confirm it.
Imagine the noise pollution from a building with only women. I’d exclude myself by choice if I hadn’t already been excluded.
Hilarity aside I can totally imagine given how bad London is the partner exemption being completely abused within five seconds. Given their inevitably shit security as well and poor planning expect the place to become a drug den within a year of the plan going ahead.
Pruitt-Igoe, London style…
Hilarious that we have not learned in more than half a century…
Much like how Marxism made a comeback as soon as people born too late to really see Communism’s failings firsthand started reaching adulthood, I suspect the history of the 21st century will be a story of people remaking the errors they weren’t around for the first time they were made.
I mean yeah. I can unironically see “Pruitt Igoe but woke” happening, but whitey can’t be allowed to have their own tower, so it would have to be one side black only, and the other side “whites allowed, but we’ll let anyone in”, lololol…
1950s segregation but woke! Everyone loses…
Blasting Taylor Swift at max volume at 5am for a McDonald's shift starting at 7am because they need to "fix themselves up".
My neighbors suddenly make a lot more sense.
The passive-aggressiveness would be off the charts.
I swear it's always fucking London, for foreigners to understand London is to the rest of the UK what Los Angeles is to the rest of America. Even left wing people outside of London look at this fucking place in absolute horror. It's one of the few bi-partisan agreements we have in the country that the place is a universally recognised shithole. Interestingly we haven't seen a drug crisis pop up there yet but it's only a matter of time.
Wouldn't London be more like NY, a cosmopolitan nightmare that is a center of finance capital?
I’m imagining his argument is that LA is more “liberal” than NYC, which is arguable I guess…
But nah, you’re right, it is much more like NYC, in every possible way, “old money” cosmopolitan liberalism included…
Same with Sydney. People always compare it to LA, and Melbourne to NYC, but that’s really not true.
Large, financial, extremely cosmopolitan port cities which are also the largest in their respective countries - they all tend to have the same “issues”, as well as arguably perks… 🤷🏻♂️
But Melbourne likes to think it is NYC, because of course it does…
I mean either one works, there's a lot of famous people that live there too, but of course, they make sure they're in the high priced white enclaves no one else can afford.
North London, innit?
Or like, West London. The posh bits, basically…
What’s the most “establishment” bit? Probably Kensington and Chelsea, right..?
Oh yeah, I mean I'm not 100% familiar with London as I try to avoid it as best as possible but yes Kensington and Chelsea are pretty renowned for being posh as fuck, Kensington would probably be the most posh. In general though London is a massively overpriced shithole where even the poor areas are just retarded.
They put up black bollards everywhere these days as well you may notice if you ever go to places like parliament square and that's to prevent trucks of peace from spreading their message and depending on where you go the places are controlled like a fortress. Ended up at one of the back end entrances of Buckingham Palace while having an explore and they've got armed police there with submachine guns lol.
Try plain concrete blocks. That’s what we have in Aus, in the major cities… 😑
Same exact reason, they just can’t be arsed even going to that effort, lol…
Unironically, I stayed in (or possibly very near) Kensington once. Accommodation was proper awful, though, so trust me, there’s still really shitty hotels, even among the extreme wealth that we’ve both evidently seen there, lol…
I only went past Bucks on the tourist bus (before London Bridge, but after the Underground shit), but I can totally imagine that, lol…
Tbf, parliament here (again, only in the major cities) has that, too.
Not so much places like the Opera House, though, but security there is still absurd, now.
Canberra, which is the capital of course, is a weird mixture of extreme over-policing (around any official government buildings), and complete lack of security on every other tourist attraction, thus allowing the Abos to literally trash each (see: Old Parliament House)…
It’s weird.
Equity means discrimination against the "correct" people is OK.
Hmm...
Dont fret. Hang back and watch them do logical trapezery with the people who "identify as tenants"
They've already dealt with the trans issue, nobody with a penis either from birth or after surgery is allowed.
That’s not what the Daily Mail article for this says…
Says that trans will be allowed…
It may be wrong, but that’s what it says, lol.
I have a better idea: get rid of the foreign rape cultists and the traitors who let them in.
I was just thinking, depending on the security measures, this sounds like it will be a very soft target for them.
Forget "imagine if the sides were reversed.", they don't consider us human and act accordingly.
I'm ok. I'm not Irish.
Looks at male genitals
Crap
The UK isn't the US