Well there have been supporters of certain teams clearly associated with political parties but a lot of that can more reasonably be broken down to the teams location and class of the supporters . Look at Rangers vs Celtic or AC Milan Vs Inter Milan . The sport itself though is just a game and is in no way political.
What Robert Reich fails to understand… sorry that list is too long…. What he fails to understand on this instance, if a company is losing money and the employees are lazy or have no real skill that provides value, they are a drain on the company and removing them is a net positive regardless if dip shit speculators temporarily cause your stock value to fall. If my stock loses value but my company is now actually profitable who cares that my theoretical money is now less when my real moneys is increasing
I watched the first episode. I don’t understand the hate. They found a site that is clearly man made and using the accepted dating method archeologists use shows it was starting to be built long before they thought. Not sure how that’s dangerous
Is Sargon arguing for 0 immigration? And how is a country allowing 0 people to move into it from foreign countries an authoritarian police state? Like not allowing emigration would be a red flag. If a countries emigration policy is this place is so great it’s illegal to leave sure. But saying we don’t owe you a spot to come to our country and leach off our social safety nets is not really authoritarian.
Well, for starters the manufacturing and ownership of guns does not require a child to be harmed while the other can not be made without harming children. While also someone acquiring a gun does not mean they will ever intend to harm a child or anyone. while the other is used to fantasize about harming children and most likely will.
So first off. If you want to have people take what you have to say seriously don’t start with an insult. No one but you are talking about payment processors. Not Tim Sweeney, no one else in this thread, nor me, just you.
Apple and Google being the owners of majority of smart phone OSs on the market does not constitute a monopoly. On the account of there being 2 of them and not one, and nothing is preventing anyone from developing a competing product. Microsoft did, it did not fail because of anything Google or Apple did, but because Microsoft tried doing what Apple does and refused to license their os to other phone manufacturers causing a small pool of potential customers for apps developed on their platform which ended up with no third party app support. All they had to do was license it to other manufacturers and they could have broken into the market.
Once again a point no one was arguing, no one has made a statement pro banning apps on an App Store. But a store controlling what product they sell is also not a monopoly. Porn distributors can’t sue Walmart or any other major retailer for refusing to sell their product. I do think it’s wrong what Apple and Google did to Parlor out of fear that Trump would go the platform so they killed the app even though it broke no part of their TOS. But again not a monopoly.
So learn to read and try not to be a cunt.
This came up in a thing I had to go to in college. The question was asked who sexually assaults who if both parties are intoxicated. The speaker said they sexually assaulted each other….. the follow up question was “so do the crimes off set? How would that be handled when charges are pressed?” They had no response.