Currently reading the original Robert E. Howard Conan the Barbarian stories...again. Last finished The Case Against Socialism by Rand Paul.

Knowing the MSM, I'd guess Vivek is that one who actually came out on top then?

Not even just women. I've known plenty of sorry excuses for men who support abortion because they don't want responsibility either. The big issues are honestly self-control and personal responsibility.

I'm noticing that now.

Spend five minutes on any website or forum that actually trusts the MSM, like r/news, and you'll see it. I'm not saying it's an all encompassing thing, but it's so incredibly common that saying it's not a thing is simply willful ignorance.

Have you not seen the constant Palestine dick sucking going on? Besides, I didn't say "respected MSM figures" are pissy, I said "a lot of the MSM"

There's a difference.

This is why I'm critical of those being pissy about Israel/Jews - they're in bed with a lot of the MSM and leftists in general, which raises all sorts of red flags.

Share it everywhere. That's the only way it'll be seen.

Well of course! Who would be to blame? Certainly not the women they're pandering to who don't go see action movies!

I would argue that, regardless of its origin, white liberal women are the ones spreading it.

Yeah he's actually a pretty talented actor. Really enjoyed him in True Detective.

Somewhere Peter Dinklage is having an aneurysm.

I agree actually. I'm talking more about situations where a woman was on her own or dealing with specific situations where men may not be able to hunt. Men were most definitely the hunters 99% of the time though.

To be fair, most modern men couldn't throw a spear either. I'm meaning in a situation where there's a woman by herself or two women by themselves, of course they would hunt to survive. They wouldn't really have much of a choice.

I'm sure there were numerous women hunters throughout prehistory, after all everyone's got to eat regardless of if they're a man or a woman. But the idea of men being the hunters while the women were in charge of the home/village/children, probably arises from what would happen in a more standard situation where there's fairly equal numbers of both sexes.

did actually whole heartedly dismiss the stupid "gender" cult creeps,

How so?

Pretty easy way to garner support in the modern world.

Dear God you're right. That's exactly how he looks.

A total mystery.

Saw the trailer and it genuinely surprised me that it was from Netflix. It's not going to get me to resubscribe, but I maybe will try to find a copy on DVD or Blu-ray if they release it at some point, or maybe rent it through Amazon.

You know, that's a valid point and I get what you're saying. I suppose I should say "We need to not try and become what the media made us out to be in the 90s."

The problem with putting political expediency so low beneath moral governance is that, if you end up losing all of your political power, your morality is eventually outlawed and censored by the winners. I'm not going to sit here and argue that moral governance has no place within republicanism, that would be an incredibly silly viewpoint to have, but you have to understand that you could be the most moral person in the world...if the entire government is run by leftists who hate you, then all the morality in the entire universe won't stop them from destroying your way of life and your family and your friends. Being morally righteous and morally correct won't stop leftist perverts from pumping children full of hormones, or cutting the breasts off of teenage girls, or erasing every last bit of our history. We don't have to be on opposite sides simply because you go to church and I don't. As long as we're both trying to stop these perverted psychos on the extreme left, we should look at one another as brothers in arms.

The 90s really were a weird time for both sides if we're being entirely honest. I think both sides went through a bit of growing pains, and I really truly believe that conservatives/republicans came out as the better group because of that said weirdness. The left, they learned the lesson that moral outrage = power, regardless of whether or not said moral outrage was correct or justified.

I just remember reading a ton of articles regarding the 2016 election, where a ton of Trump supporters said that they voted for him because the left "left them behind", so they found a new home with Republicans and conservatives. I really don't want to see that happen to the right, where we have a bunch of people leave this side of the political aisle because they feel like they're being left behind and vilified for stuff that they may not even believe. I'm not saying you should capitulate to people that don't share your beliefs, and I'm not saying you should give up your beliefs. I'm just saying that it's really stupid to drive away people who might help you vote politicians into office who will enact laws that reflect your values.

If you say so chief.

All I'm saying is that a lot of the conservative Christians of the '90s were arguing for the exact same kind of weird censorship that so-called progressives on the left are arguing for today. If the end goal is the same, it really doesn't matter where you're starting point is. I don't stand for censorship from either side, I never have and I never will. Censorship only breeds an underground, "black market" alternative. I remember hearing that GoldenEye 007, of all games, should be banned because it was too "realistic" in it's depictions of violence. Again, I'm not saying that ultra conservatives of the '90s were worse than what the left is today. All I'm saying is that they were almost identical to todays far leftists and their calls for censorship.

So, to answer your second point there...no I can't say that there's anything better about society today, but I can say that it's almost the exact same bullshit, just from a different side. That's my whole point. We shouldn't be seeking to emulate the morons on the left who want to be purity police.