Babies, sure. Even toddlers can be hard to tell the difference. Past 5 you can ALREADY tell there's a difference between boys and girls, you don't need puberty to go 'oh that's a girl!'
Wait a second, are we actually witnessing an argument again about 'no boobs and shorter height = Pedo' as I'm starting to feel that this shit job was done for that purpose.
Hell by 9 you'll want to start separating boys and girls sports if you want most of the girls to have a chance. Puberty just enhances the dimorphism, it isn't the first point of diversion.
"Usually"? No, you fucking freak. When I was 9 I remember when we'd call eachother faggot, browse 4chan and Rotten.com and rally around someone's dad's porno mags.. Girls were averse to our antics - there was absolutely no androgyny. Never was there a question of who was what in terms of appearance and behavior.
Sexual dimorphism starts in the womb due to prenatal testosterone. Baby boys are taller and heavier on average than baby girls. At the age of 4 a child’s gender can be distinguished by its voice. Prepubescent boys are on average as strong as girls that are 6 months older.
Lower sexual dimorphism compared to teens and adults doesn’t imply androgyny. Anyone claiming that children are androgynous is either a liar or a pedo.
Babies, sure. Even toddlers can be hard to tell the difference. Past 5 you can ALREADY tell there's a difference between boys and girls, you don't need puberty to go 'oh that's a girl!'
Wait a second, are we actually witnessing an argument again about 'no boobs and shorter height = Pedo' as I'm starting to feel that this shit job was done for that purpose.
Hell by 9 you'll want to start separating boys and girls sports if you want most of the girls to have a chance. Puberty just enhances the dimorphism, it isn't the first point of diversion.
You can tell the difference between boys and girls at 3 months.
Only people without kids couldn’t tell the difference.
And yet every one of them is deserving of the fate you would dole out to them.
"Usually"? No, you fucking freak. When I was 9 I remember when we'd call eachother faggot, browse 4chan and Rotten.com and rally around someone's dad's porno mags.. Girls were averse to our antics - there was absolutely no androgyny. Never was there a question of who was what in terms of appearance and behavior.
Stop turning kids into vegan cats.
Yeah.. i was peeking at my kindergartens teachers blouse back then lol.
Closer to true now I guess, with the number of kids with adults screwing with their minds and Frankensteining their hormones now.
9 years old are asexual, yes. Not in the Tumblr way
Poison ivy was a nympho, so...... That's...... Yup.
Considering how Ivy's most prominent love interest in recent years has been Harley this could be shitposted as lesbian erasure.
Androgynous if you remove every behavioral and cosmetic cues and take a still photo of the blank faces only, sure
Um... no... no they're NOT "usually" androgynous.
Sexual dimorphism starts in the womb due to prenatal testosterone. Baby boys are taller and heavier on average than baby girls. At the age of 4 a child’s gender can be distinguished by its voice. Prepubescent boys are on average as strong as girls that are 6 months older.
Lower sexual dimorphism compared to teens and adults doesn’t imply androgyny. Anyone claiming that children are androgynous is either a liar or a pedo.
WTF is this from?
https://youtu.be/yZBzHs0qr3g?si=OerCexo3EY5_1en4
It'll be really interesting watching the Ivy+Harley shoppers try to pull their crap with this one.