Some manga series I would recommend:
One Punch Man - A parody of traditional superhero stories, but in a way that is both very funny and can be quite emotional.
Liar Game - A story about a secret gambling ring. Focused on the themes of doubting and trusting people.
Kaiji - Another series about gambling, with a headstrong protagonist who doesn't really know when to stop.
Death Note - Where a highschool kid gets a book that lets him kill people by writing their name in it. It's heavy on psychology and mystery.
Monster - About a doctor who gets suspected for murder and needs to hunt down the real killer.
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure - A long series where each part has a different protagonist from the same family. Lots of fighting using supernatural abilities.
How about just Critical Theory, which I'm sure PragerU will not want to talk about the people who developed it.
It started in Weimar Germany by the Frankfurt school of Jewish Marxists who based things off of the failed Communist revolution in Germany of 1918. After Hitler took power they had to leave and went to New York where they were happily accepted at Columbia University. It was only after they taught a generation of students these curriculum under things like "Studies in Philosophy and Social Science" and inspired the sexual revolution of the 1960's to which it reached the general public.
Jacob Schiff the Wall St. banker is also very notable, he was a broker for the Rothschilds. He funded the Russo-Japanese war on the side of the Japanese and blocked loans towards Russia. Afterwards giving funding for the Bolshevik revolution. And after the Soviet Revolution various anti-racism policies were put in place.
These kinds of policies were only removed once Stalin had total control over the Soviet Union, at that point they were no longer needed.
As Winston Churchill puts it in his 1920 article Zionism vs. Bolshevism he says:
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
It's not to say that there is any one cause for something on a massive socio-political scale, but we must look at the over representations and draw natural conclusions. You can do the same for the people who created Critical Theory that is being taught in nearly every University across the western world.
Preferences, standards, and emotions, are all inherently genetic. Of course experience is significant as well, but that comes after genetics. The brain is a biological organ and is not unique in how much genetics affects it.
Which "times in history" would you say that is. As far as I can see it has always been a significant factor. Through ancient history, to modern history. Of course there are always exceptions, but I'm talking about the scale of millions of people interacting with each other.
Perhaps you mean the "anti-racism" in the soviet union.
It's good that he rejects Critical Theory, but he has a long way to go.
I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin.
Race is not simply skin color, it's far more than that. Race, or rather genetics, is a significant factor on how people think. Different races have different preferences and standards, that leads to different cultures.
By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died.
The "racial equality" movement was always going to end like this. At best it's a racial ceasefire for a period of time. However it was mostly a movement to get average white people to stop thinking as a group and accept "diversity" instead at their expense.
l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests.
Plenty of second-hand victimhood there, would you care to call it anti-white? It's not bad to care about the well being of your family and people like you. It doesn't always need to be done through proxy of "helping everybody" to justify it.
The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education.
Wrong, the number one priority has been indoctrination. Especially since the 1960's and onwards. This applies to the news as well, which is education for the adults.
Western Cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt school which was founded and developed in Weimar Germany, which began really being pushed in the US during 1960's, right when immigration was getting opened up as well. And of course the people pushing that ideology were all of a similar anti-European persuasion. Being supported by Wall Street and the international finance system to which they had allies along ideological and ethnic lines.
They are both important. Floyd's will demonstrate that being a white male police officer and doing your job is punishable to the fullest extent. Rittenhouse's will be to demonstrate that if you try to defend yourself or your overall community with force you will be attacked relentlessly as well.
No matter what, this will clearly divide society between those who are anti-white or not. You don't even have to be pro-white, if you aren't against white people enough you will be entirely vilified.
You cannot run, because this is affecting nearly every single European nation to one degree or another.
This is the point that the general population needs to recognize that a "race war" is already well underway. This is just the pro-European side losing, and the anti-European coalition winning. It's not about fairness, law, justice, or duty, it's about attacking their enemy, that's all.
Yeah it really was familiar in that regard, let's hope that enough of the general public realizes how media narratives work and that they can just be complete fabrications too.
You'll always get a woman that the media fawns over who cries out as a victim too.
I'm not sure people years from now will keep mentioning the "deadly capitol riot" like the games media can't get over gamergate though.
Well put. Racial quotas like this only serve to punish people who preform better than average, and bring down the quality overall. They do not care, it's about anti-European propaganda. Even more so that they can get a company that was once proudly American into one that hates everything that it once stood for. Hiding and shaming the company for its past transgressions as well.
Anybody who says that big corporations only care about money just needs to look at this. These kinds of policies are not for the sake of profit. Not even the "appealing to a wider audience" lie works when they've been doing it for nearly a decade now. They will gladly burn money to influence people's opinions, especially young children.
I suggest using this 1828 Webster's dictionary as well. Especially if you want to see which words have more recently been invented or had their definitions changed. For example if you look at quarantine you can see that it was mostly about preventing disease from ships, not individual people.
I've said this elsewhere here, but using the word "racist" gives you no benefit. The word was created and used as an attack against Europeans from its inception and the people who use it now still hold that position.
Instead of that call it what it is, anti-white. If you call something racist, the white person is always considered more racist inherently so you always lose. If you call something anti-white then you frame it against something that is pro-white. Either they openly come out as anti-white, or they have to distract from the issue by changing the subject.
This comic immediately comes to mind. Of course the correct thing to do isn't embrace becoming what your enemy calls you, but to not play into their narrative and instead just pursue your own interests.
Because "Climate Crisis" wasn't getting the kind of fear reaction they wanted. And if anybody is actually worried about the environment, they have to come to terms with this before thinking that more taxes or government programs will fix anything.
If you look at the major cities, yeah. Even according to wikipedia, if you look at the demographics of Toronto you can see that it's less than 50% white.
Yeah all that happened was the police let them in, a security guard shot a woman, and somebody probably stole some hard drives.
Meanwhile people in congress lie about what happened, trying to get victim points about how totally in danger they were while in a separate building. Bringing in the national guard and erecting a fence to show their confidence in this (totally legitimate and not becoming a police state) government.
Not even just art, you can use NFT's for a lot of stuff. For example the game Gods Unchained has NFT cards that you can play with. The game is like Hearthstone, but the cards are fully tradeable. Axie Infinity has tradable characters that you can breed like pokemon and use in their game.
They're basically useless when it comes to art, but I'm very excited for their applications to video games.