It's good that he rejects Critical Theory, but he has a long way to go.
I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin.
Race is not simply skin color, it's far more than that. Race, or rather genetics, is a significant factor on how people think. Different races have different preferences and standards, that leads to different cultures.
By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died.
The "racial equality" movement was always going to end like this. At best it's a racial ceasefire for a period of time. However it was mostly a movement to get average white people to stop thinking as a group and accept "diversity" instead at their expense.
l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests.
Plenty of second-hand victimhood there, would you care to call it anti-white? It's not bad to care about the well being of your family and people like you. It doesn't always need to be done through proxy of "helping everybody" to justify it.
The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education.
Wrong, the number one priority has been indoctrination. Especially since the 1960's and onwards. This applies to the news as well, which is education for the adults.
Race is not simply skin color, it's far more than that. Race, or rather genetics, is a significant factor on how people think. Different races have different preferences and standards
This is quite bizarre. Race does make differences, but if it affects preferences and standards, it does so indirectly. It certainly does not have a 'significant factor' in how people think.
The "racial equality" movement was always going to end like this. At best it's a racial ceasefire for a period of time.
And how then do you explain the times in history when race was not a factor?
This applies to the news as well, which is education for the adults.
Preferences, standards, and emotions, are all inherently genetic. Of course experience is significant as well, but that comes after genetics. The brain is a biological organ and is not unique in how much genetics affects it.
Which "times in history" would you say that is. As far as I can see it has always been a significant factor. Through ancient history, to modern history. Of course there are always exceptions, but I'm talking about the scale of millions of people interacting with each other.
It's good that he rejects Critical Theory, but he has a long way to go.
Race is not simply skin color, it's far more than that. Race, or rather genetics, is a significant factor on how people think. Different races have different preferences and standards, that leads to different cultures.
The "racial equality" movement was always going to end like this. At best it's a racial ceasefire for a period of time. However it was mostly a movement to get average white people to stop thinking as a group and accept "diversity" instead at their expense.
Plenty of second-hand victimhood there, would you care to call it anti-white? It's not bad to care about the well being of your family and people like you. It doesn't always need to be done through proxy of "helping everybody" to justify it.
Wrong, the number one priority has been indoctrination. Especially since the 1960's and onwards. This applies to the news as well, which is education for the adults.
This is quite bizarre. Race does make differences, but if it affects preferences and standards, it does so indirectly. It certainly does not have a 'significant factor' in how people think.
And how then do you explain the times in history when race was not a factor?
The word 'education' has become laughable.
Preferences, standards, and emotions, are all inherently genetic. Of course experience is significant as well, but that comes after genetics. The brain is a biological organ and is not unique in how much genetics affects it.
Which "times in history" would you say that is. As far as I can see it has always been a significant factor. Through ancient history, to modern history. Of course there are always exceptions, but I'm talking about the scale of millions of people interacting with each other.
Perhaps you mean the "anti-racism" in the soviet union.
Stalin was one of the few Bolsheviks who was a rabid anti-Semite, ironically.
What times? The Byzantine Empire, where Greek culture was the most important factor and not race.