And if they were completely removed from existence tomorrow, nigs would still nog, women would still slut, and drugs would still kill people by the landfill daily as would dozens of other problems that they might have helped build (though many are natural) but now exist on their own accord.
Which is why I said autistically single minded. That's how you reach mindsets where supporting our other enemies might seem valid simply because they hate the Jews too. Its the lacking of the big picture, second order effects, and realistic possible solutions that turns the correct (((noticing))) of the problem into self destructive nonsense.
SEAmonkey Muslims aren't any better than the Middle Eastern ones, we just aren't constantly involved in wars there nor have a "Greatest Ally" constantly forcing us to get involved. So our attention is rarely drawn to them in any way.
The Middle Eastern ones have oil and rich Saudi Prince money, which is probably the biggest reason they get focused on.
One of "antisemitisms" worst enemies is just how autistically single minded they can be. Everything wrong in this world is the fault of Jews and only Jews, and everything that is anti-Jew is probably good and we only think its bad because the Jews tricked us into thinking that.
Women can be awful all on their own, as can niggers and Muslims. Much like the TERF/tranny schism, those opposing our enemies are probably only marginally better than them sometimes and we'd be in a much worse situation if they won as well.
All humans are susceptible to peer pressure and social consensus, when they aren't its a notable dysfunction like aforementioned autists. The difference is from where they define authority and opinions worth listening to.
Women and weak men know in their bones that they are bottom bin, this means basically everyone has authority over them and thereby they are very easily lead by this leash. You can make them do anything, because this constant cowing across a lifetime has left their personality and opinions fluid as it needs to be changeable at a moment's notice. This is also why a lot of Leftist beliefs, like a good religion, needs a "devil" that can be forever and permanently below them that they can not only feel strong about rejecting (agreeing with everyone would get noticed in the brain, so they need one to say "nu uh, I listen to those who matter only") but also give them a bashing post to argue against and make themselves feel more secure in the beliefs they downloaded.
This is why they obsess over figuring out if you are a "wrongthinker" before anything, because they need to know if you are someone to assault or bow to. They don't ask "will others be OK with me thinking this?" They ask "is what he is saying on the approved list? that would make him an approved person to inform me because I am retarded."
"Higher status" men usually know their own worth, whether in success, charisma or just straight physical strength, so they can more readily parse who is and isn't worth listening to and keep the list short enough that their beliefs can solidify into confidence. And we know confidence bleeds into everything you do. They still can be changed by those they consider valuable to them (how many "alpha" men still treat their mothers as god? a huge amount), and that's what makes them often more successful.
They aren't immune to it, they just the same don't listen to those who are not on their approved list and their success has made that list so short that its harder to brute force. But they can still be led by the nose by subversives or those they have misjudged, because no man is perfect.
These video game markets are more stable than half the economies in Africa, South America and the SEA region. That's why they were able to operate so steadily for years, because for a lot of young men it became semi lucrative careers in otherwise complete poverty nations.
The only retarded part about it is forgetting that risk factor of making your money on someone else's plantation, meaning these types of explosions are always a possibility.
Considering how much if a parallel economy was built in the third world shitholes that revolves entirely around this game (and a bunch of others like Runescape) its probably a very interesting study in how capitalism itself can naturally evolve completely independent of government forces.
Like there is plenty "lmao retards gambling on pixels" on the surface, but how it reached the state it is in has all sorts of interesting aspects. Because unlike NFTs and Crypto, these types of markets were mostly organically formed.
Good to know, I've been out of the field for well over a decade so it seems things I take for basic knowledge might have changed.
Though given Psychology's numerous issues in both sample biases, failure to replicate, and general lack of accounting for factors, I don't full trust any that "buck the norm" so to speak. I personally do not like the Big Five test as I saw first hand how easy it was to both game and end up with results that barely reflected the reality of the person during my time working with it.
While anecdotes are just that, I think we can say with some certainty that there is some correlation between higher IQs and some form of mental disordering, even if its not specific to the neuroticism type. I think an important note here is neutroticism the Big Five specific trait and "being neurotic" colloquially don't fully overlap, so someone might be clearly off but not fit the label itself in its specificity. Either way, we have far too much body of evidence of something being unstable in the higher IQs to simply write it off as "study says no."
Still its always good to think about. Personally I think people use IQ itself too fluidly as shorthand for a whole host of things, and it leads to over simplifications like these. Useful for generalized stereotypes, but maybe falls apart beyond it.
At least the Christians were willing to actually go there and live among the people they were trying to convert, actually walking the walk in a way that could have worked if not for the soullessness that is the common African.
The governments involved sent other people's sons to die for their ideals and then got to go on living when they failed time and time again.
It's low neuroticism to not be particularly bothered by them
And one of the biggest correlations with higher IQ is neuroticism, which I suppose does double back to reproving the point being suggested with extra steps.
What's fucked about this is now that we know the full scope of Community Relations Service and their social engineering, we know also that a lot of those statements were made under actual threat and duress by the government itself.
I'm sure plenty of true believers didn't need it, but we will never know just how many families got tortured a second time by government goons making them kiss the boot of the people who ruined them.
If these are signs of Low IQ then for the first time ever I think they have the better deal.
Sure you should change your smoke alarm rather than get used to it, but dogs will exist and bark, as will children and rude people will forever be annoying in public. To have the ability to not become ridden with anxiety and anger at these things would be a godsend. I'd kill to be able to sleep through a dog barking two streets over, or the sound of water dripping period because its not a fun life to be the only person who hates rain.
But I don't think this is an IQ thing, almost all of this is just poor people stuff. Sure there is a lot of overlap between those two, but a high IQ child can't readily fix half this stuff but still might have to live in it just the same.
Furniture is literally given away regularly, or at bargain bin prices at every thrift store or even landfill if you catch it right. It might be worse quality but its also probably a difference of 50$ versus their emotionally attached value of hundreds to thousands.
is not comparable
It is though, because of this part:
a thinly veiled excuse
Its using one thing as a front for another more predatory goal. That's it, that's the entire purpose of the comparison and you clearly understood it and are arguing "no that's different" on points not being made so you can claim your W and feel correct.
Well I gave it to you, you got your technicality victory. You win the debate club, ignored the entirety of everything else to keep harping on a meaningless specificity and defended M'Lady's honor. You are the champion.
Based on my hazy recollection from way back the second one is pretty solid, though it was pretty hit and miss if you loved or hated the story. Monolith made both Condemned* games in between the two and you can tell they improved a bit from doing so.
The expansions were not good and the third game was by one of Microsofts random "porting" companies and it shows. Ironically the company who made it would rename themselves and become the devs behind World of Tanks a few years later.
*Condemned 2 still has probably the meatiest and most fun FPS gameplay I've ever played, and its tacked on multiplayer actually manages to use horror as a gameplay element while being incredibly fun. Its a shame that, unlike the first game, its locked to the PS3/360 with zero ports and its emulation is unplayable.
Well the topic at hand is Muslims, so there is an easy one. My personal go to is the large amount of "never voting R again because Trump Israel" which seems to exist with the presupposition that somehow the Dems would be better simply based on this singular axis.
And Jews aren't physically out in the streets murdering and raping, nor are they causing women to be women. They might have caused it to be this way, but the golem is working on its own just fine and needs to be equally addressed outside just "The Jews did this."
So what's the point about fantasizing about some utopian ideal situation where the entire world just wakes up and enacts Total Jew Death, and everything is just down river from it?