So, what, manslaughter is now just a "something bad happened, and the government hates you, so get fucked" law?
The son isn't a piece of industrial equipment. Hold the son accountable for what he did, and if the father's liable for not securing the firearms properly, prosecute him for that...
To be fair, I don't imagine Oliver views himself as particularly British either, he appears to be one of those types that imagines themselves as a "global citizen" - so wherever you live, Oliver feels free to demand things of you for his benefit...
It wasn't long, however, before the Google AI was dishing out very diverse images of, for instance, Nazis, KKK, and, of course, diverse Kings of England eating watermelon.
I understand Google is reconsidering quite how blatant they want their racial propaganda to be.
I'm pretty sure that's the aim of the people at the top of it.
But I'm pretty sure they'd happily allow white people to become slaves so the groups committed to sectarian violence all have somebody they can hold themselves superior to.
Also, there's this little thing called "jizyah", is there not?
I mean, if the House of Commons is already busy rolling over, are they going to stop at all? They've not shown any inclination to at all, even after Amess was killed.
I presume the thought on the DNC side is that if they can fortify this election enough, states won't matter, they'll get 'em at the federal level, which is better for them, anyway, as it's further removed from voters.
I'm pretty sure the long term aim of the DEI crowd is less for white people to have their own identity and more for them to have one imposed upon them.
You're aware of the generational guilt that's somewhat fashionable in Germany?
That, I imagine, but more so. All the world's ills, laid at the door of white people in general, from birth, as part of their curriculum.
And of course, that would justify taking everything from them, from their children, from their children's children, by way of reparations, until the debt is fully paid. Which it never, ever would be.
Well, this thing operates in layers, but it's the basic "Church hates apostates far, far more than it hates those who never believed at all" thing.
To someone of DEI mindset, a person of colour turning their back on DEI - actively turning to racism, to the faithful - is a far worse insult than a white person - to their mind, the white person is already racist anyway, simply on account of their skin colour.
You know, it's funny, because the one example of this that I'm aware of was a British male who fed themselves a cocktail of medication, prescription and off-prescription, to get themselves to produce something.
Yes, off-prescription. We have no bloody idea what the hell was in that, but here we have an NHS trust going "Fuck it, what's the worst that can happen?"
I suppose from their perspective, the worst case is the baby gets aborted post-partum, and, well, do feminists - I'm just assuming the NHS trust in question is feminist here - really have a problem with infanticide?
This is the US federal government we're talking about.
I'm not sure they have any interest in doing anything fairly and impartially, especially given the scare Trump gave them.
Anybody not firmly under the thumb of whichever groups run your civil service will have everything possible denied to them.
Are you sure you're not just providing them with fap material?
No matter how degenerate you think jannies are, they are worse