9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

If you're saying something Uncle Joe might have said himself, you might be a part of the problem...

11
APDSmith 11 points ago +11 / -0

So, what, manslaughter is now just a "something bad happened, and the government hates you, so get fucked" law?

The son isn't a piece of industrial equipment. Hold the son accountable for what he did, and if the father's liable for not securing the firearms properly, prosecute him for that...

1
APDSmith 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention the utter shitshow that was Algeria

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

If they knew how to step away for a minute and come back with a rational response, they couldn't be lefties...

19
APDSmith 19 points ago +19 / -0

At this level, how much of it is "business decisions" and how much is attempting to usher in this new feudalism they all seem so bloody enamoured of?

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

They can't be worse, but they could be just as bad, if the AI itself has been suborned with the same agenda.

Looks at Gemini

27
APDSmith 27 points ago +27 / -0

The important part isn't to grant nature rights, but to use those rights to remove your own.

6
APDSmith 6 points ago +6 / -0

Then the FCC allows them to establish monopolies and charge whatever they like, presumably.

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

So you enforce your laws, and any who are unable to live in a country that's not slowly being turned into a Caliphate will get tired of being imprisoned again and again for threats and intimidation, and leave.

22
APDSmith 22 points ago +22 / -0

To be fair, I don't imagine Oliver views himself as particularly British either, he appears to be one of those types that imagines themselves as a "global citizen" - so wherever you live, Oliver feels free to demand things of you for his benefit...

12
APDSmith 12 points ago +12 / -0

It wasn't long, however, before the Google AI was dishing out very diverse images of, for instance, Nazis, KKK, and, of course, diverse Kings of England eating watermelon.

I understand Google is reconsidering quite how blatant they want their racial propaganda to be.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure that's the aim of the people at the top of it.

But I'm pretty sure they'd happily allow white people to become slaves so the groups committed to sectarian violence all have somebody they can hold themselves superior to.

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

Also, there's this little thing called "jizyah", is there not?

I mean, if the House of Commons is already busy rolling over, are they going to stop at all? They've not shown any inclination to at all, even after Amess was killed.

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

Also note that under a compulsory purchase you've given a fair value for the land, not for the house.

If you're compelled to sell, you will be losing money.

7
APDSmith 7 points ago +7 / -0

I presume the thought on the DNC side is that if they can fortify this election enough, states won't matter, they'll get 'em at the federal level, which is better for them, anyway, as it's further removed from voters.

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm pretty sure the long term aim of the DEI crowd is less for white people to have their own identity and more for them to have one imposed upon them.

You're aware of the generational guilt that's somewhat fashionable in Germany?

That, I imagine, but more so. All the world's ills, laid at the door of white people in general, from birth, as part of their curriculum.

And of course, that would justify taking everything from them, from their children, from their children's children, by way of reparations, until the debt is fully paid. Which it never, ever would be.

7
APDSmith 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm not honestly sure if the long-term plan of the DEI crowd is genocide or slavery.

They don't actually object to either, if the victims are the ones it's fashionable to hate.

6
APDSmith 6 points ago +6 / -0

Unless they're mining the banned content that's not visible to more accurately flag "misinformation" for someone.

Just think, the whole internet moderated to the standards of Reddit...

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well, this thing operates in layers, but it's the basic "Church hates apostates far, far more than it hates those who never believed at all" thing.

To someone of DEI mindset, a person of colour turning their back on DEI - actively turning to racism, to the faithful - is a far worse insult than a white person - to their mind, the white person is already racist anyway, simply on account of their skin colour.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know, it's funny, because the one example of this that I'm aware of was a British male who fed themselves a cocktail of medication, prescription and off-prescription, to get themselves to produce something.

Yes, off-prescription. We have no bloody idea what the hell was in that, but here we have an NHS trust going "Fuck it, what's the worst that can happen?"

I suppose from their perspective, the worst case is the baby gets aborted post-partum, and, well, do feminists - I'm just assuming the NHS trust in question is feminist here - really have a problem with infanticide?

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is the US federal government we're talking about.

I'm not sure they have any interest in doing anything fairly and impartially, especially given the scare Trump gave them.

Anybody not firmly under the thumb of whichever groups run your civil service will have everything possible denied to them.

5
APDSmith 5 points ago +5 / -0

... so, when did Biden get resurrected without us noticing it, then?

25
APDSmith 25 points ago +25 / -0

... I mean, is anybody surprised that a bunch of leftie ideologues find themselves more at home with the authoritarianism of China than anywhere else?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›