Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

60
Defend your bullshit: no. (twitter.com)
posted 4 days ago by voidposter 4 days ago by voidposter +60 / -0
45 comments share
45 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– SocraticMethod1 26 points 4 days ago +26 / -0

I'm surprised their 'logic' hasn't created a self sustained black hole for how dense you have to be to verbalise it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 34 points 4 days ago +34 / -0

they dont care that they are logical or not. they just use words to pacify and deceive people into getting what they want.

we collectively need to stop being hung up on their double standards, injustice, illogical words and acitions and stop expecting to have a "change my mind" amicable debate with these people, they are not interested in that at all. nothing will change their mind

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– SmiggieBalls 17 points 4 days ago +17 / -0

It's all projection and a lack of empathy. And I don't mean either of those words in the way you typically see them used. What I mean is that there is a fundamental crippling flaw in the extreme majority of the Right in which they cannot see the world, or others in it, through a lens other than their own. Empathy does not actually have any connection to emotions or feeling sorry for someone, despite that being how the word is commonly used now. It actually just means being able to see someone else's perspective. And a huge portion of the right, functionally basically all of it, can't picture how someone else, a leftist in this case, views the world, sees right and wrong, and so on.

They have their own life and experiences that shaped their own worldview, the things that lead them to being on the Right, and they can only fathom the actions, thoughts, behaviors, desires, and intentions of others as viewed through that lens. In practice in cases such as this, since a person on the Right would be susceptible to accusations of hypocrisy, being called out for being demonstrably wrong, being shown their policy decisions lead to outcomes the opposite of what they intend, they view this as a universally effective weapon.

Like a vampire tying to kill a human by shoving a cross or garlic in its face. "It would work on me, so therefore it works". They can't fathom that the leftist is so inhumanly different in so many ways that literally nothing you think should be true, is true, of them.

All of the "Aha! Gotcha!" posts, all of the hypocrisy accusations, all of the "Heh, see how dumb they are" memes and tweets, all of the "We finally got the emails and the evidence that shows they were lying, that'll show em" bullshit that makes up like 90% of the Right's discourse, is all focused around that one concept. Those are things that we would care about, therefore we automatically assume they are things everyone cares about, and being able to look outside our own perspective and see that no, the left truly doesn't even register that stuff as mattering, is something that almost no one on the Right is capable of.

This clip from Frieren basically sums up the real different between the Left and Right

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFuqCO4lWKk

We care about hypocrisy, we care about logic, we care about making sense, about policies leading to outcomes that fit what we say openly we want to happen, and all the rest. So the Left uses that against us. But they don't care about any of that, and we keep getting mixed up trying to "catch" them failing to match what would be our standards, never realizing those standards were never theirs and never will be, and they in fact think our attempts to 'gotcha' them into a corner are hilariously naieve and amusing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 5 points 4 days ago +5 / -0

yep. ultimately we need to downgrade/degrade to "tribalism" because every marxist 5th column group in the US and everywhere else in the world has not evolved past that. Once we reclaim the west can we relax that mandate. But for now, we need to behave that way. Every 3rd worlder behaves that way and it is extremely effective, unfortunately. The anglican notions of blind justice, equality, law, etc do not work for any group but the west. We are beyond that now. and it is sad what we have to do, and not many people realize what we have to do

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– subbookkeeper 4 points 4 days ago +4 / -0

Thank you for the nugget of wisdom amongst the retard posting here. Please consider doing something tangible in your local community at the smallest and most accessible level possible, if you're not already.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 28 ▼
– SmiggieBalls 28 points 4 days ago +28 / -0

The key is to understand she's not confused, she's lying. She knows that paper word for word. She probably drafted some of it herself. It was entirely intentional, she knows it's an effective weapon against Western Civilization, that's why it was created, and she fully agrees with it being employed as such. But she is also aware that saying "Yes, I want to kill you and your family because you're White and replace the United States with a communist tyranny filled with subservient brown scum with a tiny handful of techno elites, which I will be part of, at the top running it all in luxury" is not yet something she can just openly say in a congressional hearing. But that's what she means. So the 'hurr I dunno, I'm as confused as you are' think is just an act.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MLGS 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

They simply sidestepped the whole issue by making "by your logic" into a phrase that triggers giggle fits, so they have an instant cognitive escape hatch whenever anybody uses it. It's so central to their mental defenses that one of the Chapo Trap House hosts made "@ByYourLogic" his Twitter username over a decade ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– CanuckElhead 18 points 4 days ago +18 / -0

Expecting them to answer for any of the bullshit they say when put under a microscope is futile but always funny to watch them get weasely and evasive I guess.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– BigWhiteWorld 14 points 4 days ago +14 / -0

brown people stink!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TheOutlaw 4 points 4 days ago +4 / -0

That's racist, saar.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 10 points 4 days ago +10 / -0

Defense is for the weak and insecure.

Attack.

ATTACK.

ATTACK.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 1 point 4 days ago +1 / -0

Attack, sir? Attack Attack! Attack what? Attack where?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 10 points 4 days ago +10 / -0

What they are doing is on purpose, they know what makes proper white western societies and they hate it, they want it gone, that is the basis for everything they do. They dont care about the words they use, or that they are hypocritical or unjust or double standards, they do not care. Their words are just the means they use to deceive people.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MartinRigggs 6 points 4 days ago +6 / -0

She should’ve just said “well, the idea is to justify the less than human behaviors of niggers by making it seem like civilized people (White people) are the bad guys”. You have to keep in mind the goal is White genocide and then Jewish world domination, whites stand in the way of the final goal.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 4 days ago +5 / -0

they shouldn't be allowed to weasel out of questioning like this

no bitch

you're in charge and you own this

now explain yourself

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DocBrody 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

"I'm not exactly familiar with that passage"

YEAH GOTCHA BITCH

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

"So you can't do the job you're being paid to do?"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Hematomato 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

Politeness is an attribute of any ruling class. In 16th century England, the nobility was polite and restrained while the peasantry spoke their minds. Politeness is a tool for rulers to say: "See? We deserve to rule specifically because we're more civilized." Whereas the ruled say: "Well, what we are, is we're getting screwed, and it's pissing us off."

Politeness isn't about race, but it is definitely about power.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– SR388-SAX 22 points 4 days ago +22 / -0

Spoken like a true leftist.

Politeness is how a normal person navigates the world without upsetting everyone.

Politeness for a revolutionary is a method to force people to behave in a way you demand.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ernsithe 7 points 4 days ago +7 / -0

He's not completely wrong, but mixing degrees of the concept. It's true that the higher the social class, the less time spent actually working, the more dead time to fill with markers of exclusivity. The that's why "common courtesy" has the qualifier. It's the level of politeness that is expected from all people in a society. As opposed to the polite manners of knowing which way a desert fork should face.

Trying to conflate the performative politeness of the elite with the politeness of basic social interaction is bad faith.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SR388-SAX 4 points 4 days ago +4 / -0

If he'd couched it that way, sure. But he didn't, and he has a history of arguing in bad faith.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hematomato 3 points 4 days ago +3 / -0

You don't have to be a Leftist to recognize that social class exists. You kind of have to be a self-deluding kind of person to pretend that it doesn't.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Kaarous 10 points 4 days ago +10 / -0

No but you are one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hematomato 1 point 4 days ago +1 / -0

I am most certainly not. I am not remotely a fan of the woke or of Leftists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Kaarous 11 points 4 days ago +11 / -0

That rings false. The only thing you do on this website is defend far left nonsense, day in and day out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Hematomato 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

No, I don't defend the far left. What I do, is I refute retarded claims.

See, I think one of the immutable laws of the universe is that the more people you add to a group, the more retarded it gets. And any group with over a million people in it has gone full retard.

If there were any wokeists or leftists in here, I'd explain to them how they've gone full retard. But there aren't. All there is is a bunch of full-retard arguments from the other side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Kaarous 12 points 4 days ago +12 / -0

You are a liar, considering your entry into this very thread is spouting a principle of Alensky.

Literally nobody believes your posturing bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 10 ▼
– SR388-SAX 10 points 4 days ago +10 / -0

No, I don't defend the far left. What I do, is I refute retarded claims.

And yet you spout your own with the idiotic premise that politeness is about power and not social cohesion. Fuck off.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– current_horror 7 points 4 days ago +7 / -0

So you've dedicated your time to posting in a dissident right wing internet containment ghetto... on the opposite side of almost every argument. And your justification for this curious, suspicious, and homosexual behavior is "I prefer smaller communities". Which doesn't make any real sense unless you're trying to fit an excuse to your questionable behavior. It's so transparent that I'm certain you're just trolling, which is whatever. But you should know that no one is fooled.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– Cyberguy64 7 points 4 days ago +7 / -0

Politeness is speaking softly while carrying a big stick. It's choosing to usediplomacy over aggression when possible for the mutual benefit of all. If there's any connection between politeness and a ruling class, it's solely due to the wisdom of such a policy elevating it's adherents.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– current_horror 3 points 4 days ago +3 / -0

Gay.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

Jews are not polite.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 3 days ago +1 / -0

Politeness is about civilization. It's the necessary social restrains needed to have thousands of people living in close proximity.

People who have no cultural concept of civilization do not understand politeness.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy