Defend your bullshit: no.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
No, I don't defend the far left. What I do, is I refute retarded claims.
See, I think one of the immutable laws of the universe is that the more people you add to a group, the more retarded it gets. And any group with over a million people in it has gone full retard.
If there were any wokeists or leftists in here, I'd explain to them how they've gone full retard. But there aren't. All there is is a bunch of full-retard arguments from the other side.
You are a liar, considering your entry into this very thread is spouting a principle of Alensky.
Literally nobody believes your posturing bullshit.
I've never read Alensky. A fucking ten-year-old can see that rich people act more politely than poor people. In every society. Everywhere. You don't need a Russian scholar to tell you what you can see with your own eyes.
It's actually more damning that you're claiming to have independently arrived at the same location as one of the more notorious antifa terrorists of all time.
You’re so concerned with being super smart and better than everyone that you forgot a basic principle: correlation does not necessarily mean causation.
Wealthier people act more politely (not even quantifiable but I’m conceding that for the sake of argument) because wealthy people tend to get wealthy because they are better at long term thinking and impulse control in the first place. In other words, higher in IQ generally. This also leads to their general ability to see the utility in social cohesion.
Yeah, that just isn't true. It might feel true if you don't have any grasp on history, but if you want to go back a few centuries and claim that the British monarchy were simply genetically superior people to the British working class, with higher IQs and a greater capacity for rational thought - well, you'd just be wrong.
Those people were genetically indistiguishable. And yet, as always, the rich used politeness as a tool of power. Because they didn't have any need for violence - they could order other people to do that for them. They didn't have any need to yell and raise their voice - they could get whatever they wanted by gesturing to a henchman.
So they put on a mask of politeness to assert the idea that they deserved all the absolute power that they had. They wanted people to think they were genetically superior and higher-IQ (not that anyone had invented IQ yet).
They weren't, though. With a little historical distance, it's easy to see that they were every bit as much the smelly dipshits that their subjects were.
And it's not just the historical British monarchy. It's all of human history.
And yet you spout your own with the idiotic premise that politeness is about power and not social cohesion. Fuck off.
The poor manage social cohesion just fine without politeness.
Ironically, that very post was a perfect example of it. Calling people retards and faggots and yelling at people to fuck off isn't polite, but it's how you socially cohere with others on the site.
So you've dedicated your time to posting in a dissident right wing internet containment ghetto... on the opposite side of almost every argument. And your justification for this curious, suspicious, and homosexual behavior is "I prefer smaller communities". Which doesn't make any real sense unless you're trying to fit an excuse to your questionable behavior. It's so transparent that I'm certain you're just trolling, which is whatever. But you should know that no one is fooled.
I like talking about stuff. I like discussion, I like conversation. I'm not a partisan, I'm not on any team, liberals fucking despise me too.
Reddit banned me, to the point they're actually enforcing that ban. Ruqqus went tits-up. Saidit went tits-up. Discuit is the worst website in the world. There's no fucking way I'm going to wade onto the Corporate Internet like Threads, where AI is now scanning every message you type to decide whether to forward it to police.
So: here I am. Attempting to talk about some stuff before the inevitable ban rolls in and I drift off to some other niche site. I wish there were free speech sites that aren't partisan, but there just aren't. Not as far as I can tell.
I guess there's Dread, but using the dark web is so obnoxious and the only thing they ever talk about over there is heroin.
I'm Gen X, so I still think of trolling as the art of generating as much outrage as you can with as few possible words. These days, "trolling" doesn't mean anything beyond "I think you suck." So if you think I suck, then I guess by definition I'm trolling?
You fail at the "with as few possible words" part, but a lot of them do. I guess that's why the zeitgeist changed