You can't see the pistol on video, but you definitely see what happens after it allegedly drew. This turns out to be a good thing because the police were trying to charge the woman for owning it.
Like the bus stabbing video, this is also a really good one in my opinion because it shows what happens in these Muslim stalking/rape cases in real time, and it's almost unbelievable. The guy is completely shameless and just books it after a girl, follows her through a carded door, and climbs up the stairs after her. He has utterly no sense of embarrassment or restraint. (Also had a fiance.) It's so cartoonish and irrational that I would have trouble taking in the story if there wasn't video.
The chick is a conservathot of some kind but she quit Fox over vaccine mandates and apparently owns an illegal gun, so she can't be all bad.
edit: I don't think the gun can be illegal in TX because they have constitutional carry. I'm guessing she plead the fifth on gun ownership to dodge potential charges of disorderly conduct or assault for pointing it at the guy.
It might be illegal if there is a school or a "place of worship"(Texas legislature's own stupid vague addition as a far as I know) within a fifth of a mile of the apartment. In most urban and even suburban areas there is more area that meets that than places that don't (If anything really doesn't considering "place of worship").
In most urban and even suburban areas there is more area that meets that than places that don't
And this is by design. Its like a restraining order, it exists in such a way that you are always going to be in violation and they just now always have a "valid" reason to pick you up and charge you if need be.
You could program the police record system so that if any gun charge is levied it automatically determines if any of these "enhancements" should be added.
I didn't see no fuckin gun. Neither did you, the cops, or anyone who's asking too many questions about why a woman would draw on a strange man following her home.
This is the inescapable corollary that follows “language as nothing more than passwords”. People who make discourse impossible are leaving you with only two options: your annihilation, or theirs.
A lot of cultures - many of them non-white - hold language to be purely transactional. For these people, communication is not a collaboration between two people seeking cooperation, mutual understanding, or truth. Instead, much of the non-white world see discourse as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desired outcomes. There’s no legitimate argument or even meaning (definition) behind the words, nothing beyond “I say x, then I get y”.
You see it at the border: I said “refugee”, so now I get in, I get free stuff, etc. In truth, you’re just an illegal opportunistic economic migrant, but you’ve some demon working for an NGO gave you the password.
You see it in police interactions: I said “I can’t breathe”, so now they can’t detain me, can’t restrain me, etc. Now the police are victimizing you, brutalizing you, and you deserve freedom (from a complicit leftist activist in a black robe) and a payout (from complicit leftist activists posing as city councilors).
This dynamic dovetails nicely with the inherent subversions of Marxism, an ideology which fundamentally and deliberately undermines all discourse with blatant redefinitions and power games. That’s why so many non-white minority groups find allies among the left; they are both using language purely as a tool to extract resources and compliance from their (mostly white) victims.
A lot of cultures - many of them non-white - hold language to be purely transactional. For these people, communication is not a collaboration between two people seeking cooperation, mutual understanding, or truth. Instead, much of the non-white world see discourse as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desired outcomes. There’s no legitimate argument or even meaning (definition) behind the words, nothing beyond “I say x, then I get y”.
That's only how they behave in the West, because like Skinner's pigeons, they pressed the lever and got the goodies. Rest assured that this does not work in their home countries.
You can't see the pistol on video, but you definitely see what happens after it allegedly drew. This turns out to be a good thing because the police were trying to charge the woman for owning it.
Like the bus stabbing video, this is also a really good one in my opinion because it shows what happens in these Muslim stalking/rape cases in real time, and it's almost unbelievable. The guy is completely shameless and just books it after a girl, follows her through a carded door, and climbs up the stairs after her. He has utterly no sense of embarrassment or restraint. (Also had a fiance.) It's so cartoonish and irrational that I would have trouble taking in the story if there wasn't video.
The chick is a conservathot of some kind but she quit Fox over vaccine mandates and apparently owns an illegal gun, so she can't be all bad.
edit: I don't think the gun can be illegal in TX because they have constitutional carry. I'm guessing she plead the fifth on gun ownership to dodge potential charges of disorderly conduct or assault for pointing it at the guy.
Greg Abbott's Texas btw. "Good thing the Dem didn't win, or Muslims would be chasing women into their own apartments!"
TeXaS VOteD for ThiS….They deserve it.
No they didn’t, yet it continues.
Well it would infact be worse Mr. Accelerationist
It might be illegal if there is a school or a "place of worship"(Texas legislature's own stupid vague addition as a far as I know) within a fifth of a mile of the apartment. In most urban and even suburban areas there is more area that meets that than places that don't (If anything really doesn't considering "place of worship").
And this is by design. Its like a restraining order, it exists in such a way that you are always going to be in violation and they just now always have a "valid" reason to pick you up and charge you if need be.
It's designed for selective enforcement.
You could program the police record system so that if any gun charge is levied it automatically determines if any of these "enhancements" should be added.
Of course they don't do that.
It's up to "discretion."
Back to back SSS posts it is. Situation will be bad enough the potential victims will end up McElroy'd.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/199536Gk9I/x/c/4ZFA7I2Amfq
I didn't see no fuckin gun. Neither did you, the cops, or anyone who's asking too many questions about why a woman would draw on a strange man following her home.
The entire DFW metroplex is a blue faggot shithole.
An armed society is a polite society as less third worlders want to risk getting mag dumped for their crimes.
Savages only understand the language of violence.
This is the inescapable corollary that follows “language as nothing more than passwords”. People who make discourse impossible are leaving you with only two options: your annihilation, or theirs.
A lot of cultures - many of them non-white - hold language to be purely transactional. For these people, communication is not a collaboration between two people seeking cooperation, mutual understanding, or truth. Instead, much of the non-white world see discourse as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desired outcomes. There’s no legitimate argument or even meaning (definition) behind the words, nothing beyond “I say x, then I get y”.
You see it at the border: I said “refugee”, so now I get in, I get free stuff, etc. In truth, you’re just an illegal opportunistic economic migrant, but you’ve some demon working for an NGO gave you the password.
You see it in police interactions: I said “I can’t breathe”, so now they can’t detain me, can’t restrain me, etc. Now the police are victimizing you, brutalizing you, and you deserve freedom (from a complicit leftist activist in a black robe) and a payout (from complicit leftist activists posing as city councilors).
This dynamic dovetails nicely with the inherent subversions of Marxism, an ideology which fundamentally and deliberately undermines all discourse with blatant redefinitions and power games. That’s why so many non-white minority groups find allies among the left; they are both using language purely as a tool to extract resources and compliance from their (mostly white) victims.
This is a brilliant way of phrasing this that I've never seen before. I'll probably end up stealing it in the future.
That's just rhetorical warfare, in a slightly more obscure way.
Insightful post.
That's only how they behave in the West, because like Skinner's pigeons, they pressed the lever and got the goodies. Rest assured that this does not work in their home countries.
They wouldn't have tried if it didn't work in their home countries
Shits just easier here
Stay strapped or get clapped (but if you are strapped the government will clap you).
50 Cent said it best: "Better caught with one than without one"
Arrest him for racism against African-American pistols.
Dude's lucky he's not white and in the UK. He'd be clamped for even noticing she existed.
She's also lucky this didn't happen in the UK, she'd be clamped for resisting the diversity.
"Ma'am, we must inform you, he actually has the appropriate paperwork and license to rape you. You should just take it."
"Oi, mate, you gotta rapin' loisence? Ya do? Roight then, carry on!"
Are you suggesting that undocumented rapists have fewer rights than documented ones?
Fbi will report him as white. Lol.
Even Texas police was afraid to investigate/prosecute migrants committing crime?
The only metric system that matters in the US.
Around nons... Carry nonblasters
https://youtu.be/VgNYDBx_sTo?t=39