The whole point of the masculinity panic is to deflect away from problems migroids are causing. That's why they do things like jailing mothers for opposing the immigration policies while letting the rape gangs go wild.
Once in a while, some women with a weak sense of self-presevation make a fuss about islamic... cultural norms about women.
Such as when they go to a place in France that is absolutely no longer France like a Café owned by muslims, staffed by muslims, and visited by 99% muslims and one lost French woman, who is asked to leave, because this Café ''is for men only'' as no lone woman as buisness being out in public like this.
The mainstream media pretends this isn't a problem. Because ''the problem'' is having a non-White muslim population in France.
Good. The true source of many of their problems, and ours, is not the problems themselves like the invaders or economics or any of that. It's letting women have any power. Get women out of power, and 90%+ of everything else gets solved automatically in turn. And it seems that the simp drive in men is so strong that the only way to get any practicable amount of men to be willing to take power back from women is to get them to hate women first.
Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.
So which is it, women deserve the hatred for advocating this in the first place or women are incompetent and should never have been given the opportunity to advocate for this?
Roman empire downhill spiral is similar to ours.. too big and had too much diversity. Became less god fearing too and senator's wives had immense influence over their husbands.
Even many feminists don’t want to confront the reality of the racist and sexist attitudes that have been imported into Britain
Feminist women are why nothing was done, or is done, about the systematic rape of their own fscking daughters by gangs of Pakistani men.
I no longer care what feminists think, about anything, because those fscking women offered their own daughters up to be sexually violated because these feminist women wanted to be, as Clint Eastwood said in one of his movies, "Stylish."
Due to the fact there are STILL too many women who support the regressive left, sexism towards women is also spiking among the native population and it's all their fault.
And they're going to be wailing when the men they've been vilifying for decades just step aside and let the third world mobs they've been importing tear them apart.
Imp had no solutions and the ones he had were either utopian or complete madness. He could barely hold a conversation without sperging and made his own side look worse by being that level of sperg. That alone is reason to oppose him.
You can agree that something is a problem without having to agree with every person also saying that.
They'll just project it onto working class white men (see, Adolescence).
Is it the low IQ, high testosterone, aggressive immigrants?
No, it's the white boy who watches youtube videos about how bad feminism ruined women.
The whole point of the masculinity panic is to deflect away from problems migroids are causing. That's why they do things like jailing mothers for opposing the immigration policies while letting the rape gangs go wild.
Reminder that Jess Philips (pictured in the article) laughed as parliament voted not to investigate the paki grooming gangs.
And about male suicide.
Once in a while, some women with a weak sense of self-presevation make a fuss about islamic... cultural norms about women.
Such as when they go to a place in France that is absolutely no longer France like a Café owned by muslims, staffed by muslims, and visited by 99% muslims and one lost French woman, who is asked to leave, because this Café ''is for men only'' as no lone woman as buisness being out in public like this.
The mainstream media pretends this isn't a problem. Because ''the problem'' is having a non-White muslim population in France.
Good. The true source of many of their problems, and ours, is not the problems themselves like the invaders or economics or any of that. It's letting women have any power. Get women out of power, and 90%+ of everything else gets solved automatically in turn. And it seems that the simp drive in men is so strong that the only way to get any practicable amount of men to be willing to take power back from women is to get them to hate women first.
I know in some countries women are just as opposed to these shitty immigration policies as men are. It hasn't changed anything.
Clearly not enough to vote out Macron and the parties supporting it.
Macron stays in power by compromising on immigration.
https://www.france24.com/en/france/20231219-french-lawmakers-fight-to-break-deadlock-over-macron-s-flagship-immigration-law
He also cracked down on Muslims already in France by banning head scarves in schools.
Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.
It's sounds like you are using a lot of confusing words to say that women don't actually have power.
I don't see that happening. I just see anti-immigration people backstabbing repeatedly, regardless of public opinion.
So which is it, women deserve the hatred for advocating this in the first place or women are incompetent and should never have been given the opportunity to advocate for this?
yes
Roman empire downhill spiral is similar to ours.. too big and had too much diversity. Became less god fearing too and senator's wives had immense influence over their husbands.
Feminist women are why nothing was done, or is done, about the systematic rape of their own fscking daughters by gangs of Pakistani men.
I no longer care what feminists think, about anything, because those fscking women offered their own daughters up to be sexually violated because these feminist women wanted to be, as Clint Eastwood said in one of his movies, "Stylish."
Put on the burka or get stoned to death, bitch!
Have your husband or son with you at all times, women are not allowed in public without men!
Due to the fact there are STILL too many women who support the regressive left, sexism towards women is also spiking among the native population and it's all their fault.
And they're going to be wailing when the men they've been vilifying for decades just step aside and let the third world mobs they've been importing tear them apart.
Get your popcorn supplies ordered now.
Okay, step one is done. Step two is the crucial follow up.
What you wanted was worse than what you had. Or "The devil you know is better than the devil you don't."
So now that we know your policies don't work, there is evidence that we should not listen to you.
There's a Joni Mitchel song called Big Yellow Taxi that came out in the 60s. Some of the lyrics are as poignant then as it is now.
♫ Don't it always seem to go ♫
♫ That you don't know what you've got till it's gone ♫
♫ They paved paradise and put up a parking lot ♫
Imp was right about quite a few things.
But he is so completely insane that it made me want to oppose him out of spite.
As opposed to, you know, the legitimate reasons.
I'm not sure what you are saying. TheImp supports mass immigration and thinks opposing it is a women's agenda.
Imp had no solutions and the ones he had were either utopian or complete madness. He could barely hold a conversation without sperging and made his own side look worse by being that level of sperg. That alone is reason to oppose him.
You can agree that something is a problem without having to agree with every person also saying that.
Imp was partly right.