Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
I know in some countries women are just as opposed to these shitty immigration policies as men are. It hasn't changed anything.
Clearly not enough to vote out Macron and the parties supporting it.
Macron stays in power by compromising on immigration.
https://www.france24.com/en/france/20231219-french-lawmakers-fight-to-break-deadlock-over-macron-s-flagship-immigration-law
He also cracked down on Muslims already in France by banning head scarves in schools.
Women becoming opposed to it (in a poll, thereby requiring no effort on their part and the expectation that men will have to do it) at this point is like finally going to the doctor once that infected cut has caused gangrene.
Of course it hasn't changed anything, its just meaningless virtue signalling once things got so bad it couldn't be denied anymore.
What do you mean? If women are the source of all these problems then that means they are the sovereign. If they are the sovereign then their preferences should be reflected in public policy should they not?
Many things in life are easy to go down and hard to go back. This is especially true when it comes to things like law, politics and demographics.
So its easy for them to vote it into place, and near impossible to (civilly) undo once it is. Super easy to virtue signal about being against it, especially once the consequences come home to roost, though.
They are the source because they provided the power and authority to the Powers That Be, mostly through voting Left consistently and easily. This doesn't mean they are the ones in charge in any way.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.