It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.
I think what I've said is pretty direct in meaning, what part of it is still confusing to you?
I don't see that happening.
The entire "kids in cages" debacle was that happening. It was meant to emotionally charge and manipulate an issue that had been becoming increasingly universal.
It's not actually hard to deport people let alone merely stop taking more in. The hard part is not having your immigration restrictionist movement subverted. That's what keeps happening in the West, not lack of electoral victories.
If they are providing power, why can't they take it away? This theory of power makes no sense to me.
That's why I said doing it civilly. Its easy to just physically and violently remove. Otherwise it will always be hamstringed and distorted, whether through direct subversives or simple emotional manipulation of voters, something women are particularly weak to. Its why the meme of "14 images that'll make you say fuck having borders" keeps repeating, its effective at returning them to the fold.
And they already provided the power, an action that cannot be undone as simply as "I oppose this now!" Once lodged, its very hard to dislodge.
It's sounds like you are using a lot of confusing words to say that women don't actually have power.
I don't see that happening. I just see anti-immigration people backstabbing repeatedly, regardless of public opinion.
I think what I've said is pretty direct in meaning, what part of it is still confusing to you?
The entire "kids in cages" debacle was that happening. It was meant to emotionally charge and manipulate an issue that had been becoming increasingly universal.
Trump did better with women in 2024, after nearly ten years of bleeding heart nonsense about kids in cages and constant sex wars agitprop.